A Collective Action Perspective on Technological Innovation in Business/Government Networks

A major challenge for European governments is solving the dilemma of increasing security and control of international trade, while at the same time reducing the administrative overhead. The EU focuses on the introduction of paperless IS to tackle this. In order to really bring benefits for both parties and address the dilemma, it becomes increasingly important that governments and businesses look for alternative innovative solutions that go beyond simply replacing paper-based systems with IT. However the EU works with a predefined, long-term agenda which is linked to the EU legislation. Even if such alternative innovative solutions are developed, they are doomed to fail, if a network of powerful actors is not (or is inappropriately) mobilized to bring the desired change up to the legislative level. There is only limited understanding about how such networks can be mobilized. In this paper, we investigate the Beer Living Lab (Beer LL) pilot project applying the collective action model of institutional innovation of Hargrave and Van de Ven. The model appears to be an interesting lens to analyze the eCustoms developments.

[1]  P. Attewell Technology Diffusion and Organizational Learning: The Case of Business Computing , 1992 .

[2]  S. Barley Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. , 1986, Administrative science quarterly.

[3]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Explaining Development and Change in Organizations , 1995 .

[4]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  GIS for District-Level Administration in India: Problems and Opportunities , 1999, MIS Q..

[5]  John L. Campbell WHERE DO WE STAND? COMMON MECHANISMS IN ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIAL MOVEMENTS RESEARCH , 2005 .

[6]  John Law,et al.  Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity , 1992 .

[7]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Electronic Data Interchange and Small Organizations: Adoption and Impact of Technology , 1995, MIS Q..

[8]  Jacky Swan,et al.  A knowledge‐focused perspective on the diffusion and adoption of complex information technologies: the BPR example , 2000, Inf. Syst. J..

[9]  E. Burton Swanson,et al.  Innovating Mindfully with Information Technology , 2004, MIS Q..

[10]  Kim Viborg Andersen,et al.  E-government and Public Sector Process Rebuilding: Dilettantes, Wheel Barrows, and Diamonds , 2006 .

[11]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[12]  Robert G. Fichman,et al.  Going Beyond the Dominant Paradigm for Information Technology Innovation Research: Emerging Concepts and Methods , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[13]  R. Westrum The Social Construction of Technological Systems , 1989 .

[14]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Institutional Factors in Information Technology Innovation , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..

[15]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations , 1993 .

[16]  Lewis A. Coser,et al.  Social Conflict and the Theory of Social Change , 1957 .

[17]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  Developing an Understanding of Interorganizational Systems: Arguments for Multi-Level Analysis and Structuration Theory , 2000, ECIS.

[18]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[19]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  A Collective Action Model of Institutional Innovation , 2006 .

[20]  J. Kenneth Benson,et al.  Organizations: A Dialectical View. , 1977 .

[21]  T. Pinch,et al.  The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other , 1984 .

[22]  Paul Ati ' Ewell TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION AND ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING: THE CASE OF BUSINESS COMPUTING* , 1992 .

[23]  Eric Abrahamson Managerial Fads and Fashions: The Diffusion and Rejection of Innovations , 1991 .

[24]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Power, politics, and MIS implementation , 1987, CACM.

[25]  Alexandra Waluszewski,et al.  Managing Technological Development , 2002 .

[26]  Yao-Hua Tan,et al.  eCustoms Innovation and Transformation: A Research Approach , 2006, Bled eConference.

[27]  Jane E. Fountain,et al.  Public Sector: Early Stage of a Deep Transformation , 2001 .

[28]  M. Markus,et al.  Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research , 1988 .