Apical Descent in the Office and the Operating Room: The Effect of Prolapse Size

Objectives The support of the uterine cervix with Valsalva or cough assessed in the clinic and the support of the uterine cervix with traction in the operating room often differs. The objectives of this study were to test the null hypothesis that the difference between preoperative and intraoperative values of pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) point C is not related to prolapse size and to determine if other factors exist that predict this difference. Methods This is a retrospective review of women who had a vaginal hysterectomy in the Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery division between 2005 and 2011 and had preoperative and intraoperative POP-Q point C recorded. A difference of 5 cm was established by a panel of urogynecologists as clinically significant. Student t tests and &khgr;2 analyses were used and a logistic regression performed. Results There were 206 subjects included. The mean difference in point C between the 2 clinical settings was 3.5 cm. A difference of 5 cm or greater was present in 33%. The mean difference in point C was larger for women with lesser stages of prolapse (stage 1, 5.8 cm; stage 2, 3.0 cm; stage 3/4, 1.4 cm; P<0.001). A difference of 5 cm or greater in point C was more often present in women with lesser stages of prolapse: 70.3% of women with stage 1 prolapse, 9.3% of women with stage 2 prolapse, and 8.5% of women with stage 3 prolapse (P<0.001). Conclusions We reject our null hypothesis. A difference of 5 cm or greater between POP-Q point C in the clinic and the POP-Q point C in the operating room occurred more frequently in women with lesser stages of prolapse.

[1]  C. Moore,et al.  Does neuromuscular blockade affect the assessment of pelvic organ prolapse? , 2012, International Urogynecology Journal.

[2]  P. White,et al.  Traction on the cervix in theatre before anterior repair: Does it tell us when to perform a concomitant hysterectomy? , 2012, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[3]  P. Dwyer,et al.  Does pre-operative traction on the cervix approximate intra-operative uterine prolapse? A randomised controlled trial , 2012, International Urogynecology Journal.

[4]  H. Zyczynski,et al.  The Role of Apical Vaginal Support in the Appearance of Anterior and Posterior Vaginal Prolapse , 2008, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[5]  L. Brubaker,et al.  Advanced anterior vaginal wall prolapse is highly correlated with apical prolapse. , 2006, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[6]  H. Hussain,et al.  The relationship between anterior and apical compartment support. , 2006, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  T. Kuehl,et al.  A comparison of preoperative and intraoperative evaluations for patients who undergo site-specific operation for the correction of pelvic organ prolapse. , 2002, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[8]  M. Vierhout,et al.  A comparison of preoperative and intraoperative evaluation of patients undergoing pelvic reconstructive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse using the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system , 2005, International Urogynecology Journal.