Facial attractiveness

Humans in societies around the world discriminate between potential mates on the basis of attractiveness in ways that can dramatically affect their lives. From an evolutionary perspective, a reasonable working hypothesis is that the psychological mechanisms underlying attractiveness judgments are adaptations that have evolved in the service of choosing a mate so as to increase gene propagation throughout evolutionary history. The main hypothesis that has directed evolutionary psychology research into facial attractiveness is that these judgments reflect information about what can be broadly defined as an individual's health. This has been investigated by examining whether attractiveness judgments show special design for detecting cues that allow us to make assessments of overall phenotypic condition. This review examines the three major lines of research that have been pursued in order to answer the question of whether attractiveness reflects non-obvious indicators of phenotypic condition. These are studies that have examined facial symmetry, averageness, and secondary sex characteristics as hormone markers.

[1]  L. Mealey,et al.  Symmetry and perceived facial attractiveness: a monozygotic co-twin comparison. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  K. Grammer,et al.  Human body odour, symmetry and attractiveness , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  Douglas W. Yu,et al.  Beauty Is in the Eye of the Beholder , 2010, Phunny Stuph.

[4]  D. Perrett,et al.  Facial shape and judgements of female attractiveness , 1994, Nature.

[5]  D. Berry,et al.  Accuracy in Face Perception: A View from Ecological Psychology , 1993 .

[6]  Victor S. Johnston.  Why We Feel: The Science Of Human Emotions , 1999 .

[7]  A. Grafen.  Biological signals as handicaps. , 1990, Journal of theoretical biology.

[8]  R. Larsen,et al.  Facial Attractiveness and Physical Health , 1999 .

[9]  D. Buss,et al.  Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures , 1989, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[10]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Facial symmetry and the perception of beauty , 1998 .

[11]  V F Ferrario,et al.  Facial morphometry of television actresses compared with normal women. , 1995, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[12]  E. Cashdan.  Attracting mates: Effects of paternal investment on mate attraction strategies , 1993 .

[13]  A H Sather,et al.  Determinants of facial attractiveness in a sample of white women. , 1994, The International journal of adult orthodontics and orthognathic surgery.

[14]  D. Dennett.  Darwin's Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life , 1995 .

[15]  M. Petrie,et al.  VARIATION IN MATE CHOICE AND MATING PREFERENCES: A REVIEW OF CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES , 1997, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[16]  D. Symons.  Beauty is in the adaptations of the beholder: The evolutionary psychology of human female sexual attractiveness. , 1995 .

[17]  R. Thornhill,et al.  The scent of symmetry: A human sex pheromone that signals fitness? , 1999 .

[18]  M. Tovée,et al.  Visual cues to female physical attractiveness , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  Amots Zehavi,et al.  The Handicap Principle: A Missing Piece of Darwin's Puzzle , 1997 .

[20]  Leslie A. Zebrowitz,et al.  Stability of babyfaceness and attractiveness across the life span. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  D. Perrett,et al.  Menstrual cycle alters face preference , 1999, Nature.

[22]  Frank C. Rohwer,et al.  Status signalling in harris sparrows: Experimental deceptions achieved , 1978, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  Randy Thornhill,et al.  Physical attractiveness and the theory of sexual selection: Results from five populations , 1998 .

[24]  J. Langlois,et al.  Infant Attractiveness Predicts Maternal Behaviors and Attitudes , 1995 .

[25]  D. Waynforth,et al.  Fluctuating asymmetry and human male life-history traits in rural Belize , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  Anita P. Barbee,et al.  "Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours": Consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female physical attractiveness. , 1995 .

[27]  T. Pruzinsky.  The Beauty Myth: How Images of Beauty Are Used Against Women , 1993 .

[28]  T. Alley.  The Developmental Stability of Facial Attractiveness: New Longitudinal Data and a Review. , 1993 .

[29]  Leslie A. Zebrowitz,et al.  Does Human Facial Attractiveness Honestly Advertise Health? Longitudinal Data on an Evolutionary Question , 1998 .

[30]  J. Langlois,et al.  What Is Average and What Is Not Average About Attractive Faces? , 1994 .

[31]  Steven W. Gangestad,et al.  Pathogen prevalence and human mate preferences , 1993 .

[32]  U. Mueller,et al.  Facial Dominance of West Point Cadets as a Predictor of Later Military Rank , 1996 .

[33]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Facial attractiveness, symmetry and cues of good genes , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[34]  R. Johnstone.  Female preference for symmetrical males as a by-product of selection for mate recognition , 1994, Nature.

[35]  L. Cosmides,et al.  The Adapted mind : evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture , 1992 .

[36]  William G. Graziano,et al.  Social influence, sex differences, and judgments of beauty: Putting the interpersonal back in interpersonal attraction. , 1993 .

[37]  Victor S. Johnston,et al.  Facial beauty and the late positive component of event‐related potentials , 1997 .

[38]  D. Perrett,et al.  Symmetry and human facial attractiveness. , 1999 .

[39]  A. Eagly,et al.  What is beautiful is good, but…: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. , 1991 .

[40]  D. Perrett,et al.  Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness , 1998, Nature.

[41]  M. Ryan.  Sexual selection, sensory systems and sensory exploitation. , 1990 .

[42]  K. Grammer,et al.  Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: the role of symmetry and averageness. , 1994, Journal of comparative psychology.

[43]  C. Bardin,et al.  Testosterone: a major determinant of extragenital sexual dimorphism. , 1981, Science.

[44]  I. Cuthill,et al.  Asymmetry and human facial attractiveness: symmetry may not always be beautiful , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[45]  S. Gangestad,et al.  Sexual selection and physical attractiveness , 1993, Human nature.

[46]  Nordell,et al.  Mate choice copying as public information , 1998 .

[47]  K. Grammer.  5-α-androst-16en-3α-on: A male pheromone? A brief report , 1993 .

[48]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Menstrual cycle variation in women's preferences for the scent of symmetrical men , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[49]  Møller.  Asymmetry as a predictor of growth, fecundity and survival , 1999 .

[50]  Alan Feingold,et al.  Gender differences in effects of physical attractiveness on romantic attraction: A comparison across five research paradigms. , 1990 .

[51]  R. Thornhill.  The concept of an evolved adaptation. , 1997, Ciba Foundation symposium.

[52]  C. Keating,et al.  Gender and the physiognomy of dominance and attractiveness. , 1985 .

[53]  C. Grossman.  Interactions between the gonadal steroids and the immune system. , 1985, Science.

[54]  C. Panter-Brick,et al.  Salivary testosterone levels among Tamang and Kami males of central Nepal. , 1996, Human biology.

[55]  Thornhill,et al.  Individual differences in developmental precision and fluctuating asymmetry: a model and its implications , 1999 .

[56]  J. Udry,et al.  Dominant looking male teenagers copulate earlier , 1994 .

[57]  D. Buss,et al.  Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. , 1993, Psychological review.

[58]  K. Grammer,et al.  The Body and Face of Woman: One Ornament that Signals Quality? , 1999 .

[59]  Lori A. Roggman,et al.  Facial Diversity and InfantPreferences for Attractive Faces , 1991 .

[60]  J. Langlois,et al.  Attractive Faces Are Only Average , 1990 .

[61]  Michael J. Ryan,et al.  Male body length influences mate-choice copying in the sailfin molly Poecilia latipinna , 1998 .

[62]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Human sexual selection and developmental stability. , 1997 .

[63]  Randy Thornhill,et al.  A Natural History of Rape: Biological Bases of Sexual Coercion , 2000 .

[64]  Margo I. Wilson,et al.  Human evolutionary psychology and animal behaviour , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[65]  R. Thornhill,et al.  DEVELOPMENTAL STABILITY, DISEASE AND MEDICINE , 1997, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[66]  P. Todd,et al.  Mate choice turns cognitive , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[67]  V S Johnston,et al.  Gender differences in late positive components evoked by human faces. , 1999, Psychophysiology.

[68]  R. Larsen,et al.  Facial asymmetry as an indicator of psychological, emotional, and physiological distress. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[69]  Yuji Moro,et al.  Facial Asymmetry and Attractiveness Judgment in Developmental Perspective , 2001 .

[70]  M. Cunningham.  Measuring the physical in physical attractiveness: quasi-experiments on the sociobiology of female facial beauty , 1986 .

[71]  M. Wiederman,et al.  Evolution and Sex Differences in Preferences for Short-Term Mates: Results from a Policy Capturing Study , 1998 .

[72]  Albert M. Magro.  Evolutionary-Derived Anatomical Characteristics and Universal Attractiveness , 1999, Perceptual and motor skills.

[73]  Magnus Enquist,et al.  Symmetry, beauty and evolution , 1994, Nature.

[74]  M. Cunningham,et al.  Angels, mentors, and friends: Trade-offs among evolutionary, social, and individual variables in physical appearance. , 1997 .

[75]  G. Williams,et al.  Natural selection : domains, levels, and challenges. , 1994 .