The effect of different convection cooking methods on the instrumental quality and yield of pork Longissimus dorsi.

The effect of different cooking methods (natural convection, NC, forced convection, FC and forced convection/steam combined, FC/S) on selected physical properties of cooked pork Longissimus dorsi samples were compared. FC/S treatment was significantly faster (∼19 min) than NC and FC cooking treatments (∼27 min). The overall cook values at the center of all samples (calculated taking into consideration the cooling phase) were comparable and might explain the similar tenderness found among samples that underwent significantly different thermal histories. The weight loss of the FC/S samples was significantly higher than in the other cooking methods while the color of the surface was paler than the NC and FC ones.

[1]  N. Gardés,et al.  Influence de trois modes de cuisson sur quelques caractéristiques d'un rôti de porc , 1995 .

[2]  M. Iqbal An introduction to solar radiation , 1983 .

[3]  B. Duval Commission internationale de l’éclairage (CIE) , 2001, Optique Photonique.

[4]  Daniel L. Engeljohn,et al.  Performance Standards for the Production of Certain Meat and Poultry Products , 1999 .

[5]  G. Nute,et al.  The effect of cooking conditions on the eating quality of pork. , 1995, Meat science.

[6]  T. R. Carr,et al.  Variation in composition and palatability traits and relationships between muscle characteristics and palatability in a random sample of pork carcasses. , 1988 .

[7]  J. H. Houben,et al.  Mechanical and microstructural characteristics of meat doughs, either heated by a continuous process in a radio-frequency field or conventionally in a waterbath. , 1994, Meat science.

[8]  J. Lyng,et al.  Effect of radio frequency cooking on the texture, colour and sensory properties of a large diameter comminuted meat product. , 2004, Meat science.

[9]  R. E. Rust,et al.  Effect of Degree of Marbling and Internal Temperature of Doneness on Beef Rib Steaks , 1973 .

[10]  A. Califano,et al.  Effect of processing conditions on the hardness of cooked beef , 1997 .

[11]  E. Laakkonen,et al.  LOW-TEMPERATURE, LONG-TIME HEATING OF BOVINE MUSCLE 1. Changes in Tenderness, Water-Binding Capacity, pH and Amount of Water-Soluble Components , 1970 .

[12]  Alejandra Picallo,et al.  Sous vide cooked beef muscles: effects of low temperature-long time (LT-LT) treatments on their quality characteristics and storage stability , 2002 .

[13]  P. Purslow,et al.  The effect of cooking temperature on mechanical properties of whole meat, single muscle fibres and perimysial connective tissue. , 2000, Meat science.

[14]  R. Allen,et al.  Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Water Requirements , 1990 .

[15]  T. Durance,et al.  Composition and retention of lipid nutrients in cooked ground beef relative to heat-transfer rates , 2001 .

[16]  M. Dikeman,et al.  Tenderness and collagen composition of beef semitendinosus roasts cooked by conventional convective cooking and modeled, multi-stage, convective cooking. , 2000, Meat science.

[17]  R. Hovenier,et al.  Repeatability of taste panel tenderness scores and their relationships to objective pig meat quality traits. , 1993, Journal of animal science.

[18]  M. V. Van Oeckel,et al.  Pork tenderness estimation by taste panel, Warner-Bratzler shear force and on-line methods. , 1999, Meat science.

[19]  H. Daun,et al.  Changes in texture, cooking losses, and myofibrillar structure of bovine M. semitendinosus during heating. , 1999, Meat science.

[20]  E C Clausen,et al.  Heat transfer properties, moisture loss, product yield, and soluble proteins in chicken breast patties during air convection cooking. , 2001, Poultry science.

[21]  S. Holdsworth,et al.  Optimisation of Thermal Processing - A Review , 1985 .