Comparison of Candidate Architectures for Future Distributed Propulsion Aircraft

Turbine-engine-driven distributed electrical aircraft power systems [also referred to as turboelectric distributed propulsion (TeDP)] are proposed for providing thrust for future aircraft with superconducting components operating at 77 K, in order for performance and emission targets to be met. The proposal of such systems presents a radical change from current state-of-the-art aeroelectrical power systems. Central to the development of such power systems are architecture design trades which must consider system functionality and performance, system robustness, and fault ridethrough capability, in addition to the balance between mass and efficiency. This paper presents a quantitative comparison of the three potential candidate architectures for TeDP electrical networks. This analysis provides the foundations for establishing the feasibility of these different architectures subject to design and operational constraints. The findings of this paper conclude that a purely ac synchronous network performs best in terms of mass and efficiency, but similar levels of functionality and controllability to an architecture with electrical decoupling via dc cannot readily be achieved. If power electronic converters with cryocoolers are found to be necessary for functionality and controllability purposes, then studies show that a significant increase in the efficiency of solid-state switching components is necessary to achieve specified aircraft performance targets.

[1]  Alexis Kwasinski,et al.  Advanced power electronics enabled distribution architectures: Design, operation, and control , 2011, 8th International Conference on Power Electronics - ECCE Asia.

[2]  Megan S. Ryerson,et al.  Fuel Consumption and Operational Performance , 2011 .

[3]  Gerald V. Brown,et al.  An Examination of the Effect of Boundary Layer Ingestion on Turboelectric Distributed Propulsion Systems , 2011 .

[4]  Gerald V. Brown,et al.  Turboelectric Distributed Propulsion Engine Cycle Analysis for Hybrid-Wing-Body Aircraft , 2009 .

[5]  James L. Felder,et al.  Sensitivity of Mission Energy Consumption to Turboelectric Distributed Propulsion Design Assumptions on the N3-X Hybrid Wing Body Aircraft , 2012 .

[6]  Benoit Robyns,et al.  Experimental Validation of Energy Storage System Management Strategies for a Local DC Distribution System of More Electric Aircraft , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[7]  P.J. Masson,et al.  Next Generation More-Electric Aircraft: A Potential Application for HTS Superconductors , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[8]  P. Masson,et al.  HTS motors in aircraft propulsion: design considerations , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[9]  Mark Husband,et al.  HTS Electrical System for a Distributed Propulsion Aircraft , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[10]  C. E. Jones,et al.  Turboelectric distributed propulsion protection system design trades , 2014 .

[11]  Gerald V. Brown,et al.  Weights and Efficiencies of Electric Components of a Turboelectric Aircraft Propulsion System , 2011 .

[12]  Kaushik Rajashekara,et al.  Trade Studies for NASA N3-X Turboelectric Distributed Propulsion System Electrical Power System Architecture , 2012 .

[13]  C. E. Jones,et al.  Architecture, Voltage and Components for a Turboelectric Distributed Propulsion Electric Grid , 2015 .

[14]  James L. Felder,et al.  Distributed Turboelectric Propulsion for Hybrid Wing Body Aircraft , 2008 .

[15]  Michael James Armstrong,et al.  Sensitivity of TeDP Microgrid System Weight and Efficiency to Operating Voltage , 2014 .

[16]  C. E. Jones,et al.  A pre-design sensitivity analysis tool for consideration of full-electric aircraft propulsion electrical power system architectures , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Electrical Systems for Aircraft, Railway, Ship Propulsion and Road Vehicles (ESARS).