Research, part of a Special Feature on Effects of Roads and Traffic on Wildlife Populations and Landscape Function Behavioral Responses of Northern Leopard Frogs (Rana pipiens) to Roads and Traffic: Implications for Population Persistence

A key goal in road ecology is to determine which species are most vulnerable to the negative effects of roads on population persistence. Theory suggests that species that avoid roads are less likely to be negatively affected by roads than those that do not avoid roads. The goal of this study was to take a step toward testing this prediction by evaluating the behavioral response to roads and traffic of a species whose populations are known to be negatively affected by roads and traffic, the northern leopard frog (Rana pipiens). We studied the movement patterns of northern leopard frogs during their spring migration from overwintering sites in a river to various breeding ponds that were disconnected from the river by roads. We performed short-distance translocations of migrating frogs, followed them visually, and documented their movement coordinates following each hop, both near the roads and in non-roaded areas. We found that frogs took longer to move near roads with more traffic and that their movement was quickest in areas without roads nearby. Frogs tended to deviate more from a straight-line course when they were released near roads than compared with control areas, but this response was independent of traffic volume. All frogs released near roads attempted to cross the road. On very low traffic roads (10.86 mean vehicles per hour), 94% of frogs crossed the road successfully, whereas at higher traffic roads (58.29 mean vehicles per hour) 72% were successful. Our results suggest that frog's inability to avoid going onto roads and their slow movement combine to make them particularly vulnerable to road mortality, which likely explains the strong negative effects of roads on frog population abundance. Conservation efforts should focus on preventing frogs from accessing the road surface through the use of drift fencing and culverts.

[1]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Movement Patterns of Eastern Chipmunks (Tamias striatus) Near Roads , 2008 .

[2]  Lenore Fahrig,et al.  The relative effects of road traffic and forest cover on anuran populations , 2008 .

[3]  Lenore Fahrig,et al.  Accessible habitat: an improved measure of the effects of habitat loss and roads on wildlife populations , 2008, Landscape Ecology.

[4]  Inga A. Roedenbeck,et al.  Effects of roads on spatial distribution, abundance and mortality of brown hare (Lepus europaeus) in Switzerland , 2008, European Journal of Wildlife Research.

[5]  Lenore Fahrig,et al.  Non‐optimal animal movement in human‐altered landscapes , 2007 .

[6]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Do small mammals avoid roads because of the traffic , 2007 .

[7]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Effect of road density on abundance of white-footed mice , 2007, Landscape Ecology.

[8]  J. Gibbs,et al.  Road-Crossing Structures for Amphibians and Reptiles: Informing Design through Behavioral Analysis , 2007 .

[9]  C. Findlay,et al.  The Rauischholzhausen Agenda for Road Ecology , 2007 .

[10]  P. Kindlmann,et al.  Barrier effects of roads on movements of small mammals , 2007 .

[11]  B. Kingsbury,et al.  Beyond the wetland border: Estimating the impact of roads for two species of water snakes , 2006 .

[12]  W. Boarman,et al.  A highway's road-effect zone for desert tortoises (Gopherus agassizii) , 2006 .

[13]  K. Andrews,et al.  How do Highways Influence Snake Movement? Behavioral Responses to Roads and Vehicles , 2005, Copeia.

[14]  M. Mazerolle,et al.  BEHAVIOR OF AMPHIBIANS ON THE ROAD IN RESPONSE TO CAR TRAFFIC , 2005 .

[15]  J. Bissonette,et al.  How to Teach a Mule Deer to Safely Cross an Interstate Highway: Preliminary Results of a Wildlife Mortality Mitigation Strategy on Interstate 15 in Utah, USA , 2005 .

[16]  F. van Langevelde,et al.  Using traffic flow theory to model traffic mortality in mammals , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[17]  C. K. Dodd,et al.  Effectiveness of a barrier wall and culverts in reducing wildlife mortality on a heavily traveled highway in Florida , 2004 .

[18]  Sharon K. Collinge,et al.  Landscape effects on black-tailed prairie dog colonies , 2004 .

[19]  James P. Gibbs,et al.  Distribution of woodland amphibians along a forest fragmentation gradient , 1998, Landscape Ecology.

[20]  James P. Gibbs,et al.  Estimating the Effects of Road Mortality on Turtle Populations , 2002 .

[21]  P. Sherman,et al.  Ecological and evolutionary traps. , 2002 .

[22]  Lenore Fahrig,et al.  Effect of Road Traffic on Two Amphibian Species of Differing Vagility , 2001 .

[23]  T. Hels,et al.  The effect of road kills on amphibian populations , 2001 .

[24]  Lenore Fahrig,et al.  Landscape complementation and metapopulation effects on leopard frog populations , 2000 .

[25]  D. Rudolph,et al.  Preliminary Evaluation of the Impact of Roads and Associated Vehicular Traffic on Snake Populations in Eastern Texas , 1999 .

[26]  J. Heinen,et al.  ANTIPREDATOR BEHAVIORS OF NEWLY METAMORPHOSED GREEN FROGS (RANA CLAMITANS)AND LEOPARD FROGS (R. PIPIENS) IN ENCOUNTERS WITH EASTERN GARTER SNAKES (TH AMNOPHIS S. SIRTALIS) , 1997 .

[27]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Effect of road traffic on amphibian density , 1995 .

[28]  M. Munguira,et al.  Use of Road Verges by Butterfly and Burnet Populations, and the Effect of Roads on Adult Dispersal and Mortality , 1992 .

[29]  T. Garland,et al.  Effects of a Highway on Mojave Desert Rodent Populations , 1984 .

[30]  A. D. Geis,et al.  EFFECTS OF ROADS ON SMALL MAMMALS , 1983 .

[31]  Garrett K. Mandeville,et al.  Validity conditions in repeated measures designs. , 1979 .

[32]  E. D. Fleharty,et al.  Movements of Rodents Across Roads , 1979 .