Examining academic ranking and inequality in library and information science through faculty hiring networks

Abstract In this study, we examine academic ranking and inequality in library and information science (LIS) using a faculty hiring network of 643 faculty members from 44 LIS schools in the United States. We employ four groups of measures to study academic ranking, including adjacency, placement and hiring, distance-based measures, and hubs and authorities. Among these measures, closeness and hub measures have the highest correlation with the U.S. News ranking (r = 0.78). We study academic inequality using four distinct methods that include downward/upward placement, Lorenz curve, cliques, and egocentric networks of LIS schools and find that academic inequality exists in the LIS community. We show that the percentage of downward placement (68%) is much higher than that of upward placement (22%); meanwhile, 20% of the 30 LIS schools that have doctoral programs produced nearly 60% of all LIS faculty, with a Gini coefficient of 0.53. We also find cliques of highly ranked schools and a core/periphery structure that distinguishes LIS schools of different ranks. Overall, LIS faculty hiring networks have considerable value in deriving credible academic ranking and revealing faculty exchange within the field.

[1]  Daniel B. Larremore,et al.  Systematic inequality and hierarchy in faculty hiring networks , 2015, Science Advances.

[2]  Sebastiano Vigna,et al.  Axioms for Centrality , 2013, Internet Math..

[3]  Peter J Mucha,et al.  Mathematical genealogy and department prestige. , 2011, Chaos.

[4]  Phillip Bonacich,et al.  Some unique properties of eigenvector centrality , 2007, Soc. Networks.

[5]  B. Grofman,et al.  The Production and Placement of Political Science Ph.D.s, 1902–2000 , 2007, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[6]  Marko Terviö.  Divisions within Academia: Evidence from Faculty Hiring and Placement , 2011, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[7]  Min Song,et al.  Understanding the evolving academic landscape of library and information science through faculty hiring data , 2016, Scientometrics.

[8]  Martin G. Everett,et al.  Models of core/periphery structures , 2000, Soc. Networks.

[9]  D. Katz,et al.  Reproduction of Hierarchy? A Social Network Analysis of the American Law Professoriate , 2009 .

[10]  R. Luce,et al.  A method of matrix analysis of group structure , 1949, Psychometrika.

[11]  C. Sugimoto,et al.  Library and Information Science Doctoral Education: The Landscape from 1930-2007 , 2009 .

[12]  Sandra González-Bailón,et al.  Network Effects in the Academic Market: Mechanisms for Hiring and Placing PhDs in Communication (2007-2014): Hiring and Placement in Communication , 2015 .

[13]  A. Guarino,et al.  Faculty Hiring at Top-Ranked Higher Education Administration Programs: An Examination Using Social Network Analysis , 2009 .

[14]  Andrea Wiggins,et al.  Intellectual diversity and the faculty composition of iSchools , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[15]  Leonard M. Freeman,et al.  A set of measures of centrality based upon betweenness , 1977 .

[16]  Sandra González-Bailón,et al.  Network Effects in the Academic Market: Mechanisms for Hiring and Placing Ph.D.s in Communication (2007-2014) , 2015 .

[17]  Rabah AMIR,et al.  Ranking Economics Departments Worldwide on the Basis of Phd Placement , 2005 .

[18]  A. K. Kurtz.  The simultaneous prediction of any number of criteria by the use of a unique set of weights , 1937 .

[19]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Network Analysis in the Social Sciences , 2009, Science.

[20]  John Scott.  What is social network analysis , 2010 .

[21]  Jon Kleinberg,et al.  Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment , 1999, SODA '98.

[22]  B. Grofman,et al.  Social Networks in Political Science: Hiring and Placement of Ph.D.s, 1960–2002 , 2007, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[23]  Matthew M. Chingos,et al.  Ranking Doctoral Programs by Placement: A New Method , 2007, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[24]  Joseph L. Gastwirth,et al.  A General Definition of the Lorenz Curve , 1971 .

[25]  George A. Barnett,et al.  Measuring Quality in Communication Doctoral Education Using Network Analysis of Faculty‐Hiring Patterns , 2010 .

[26]  J. Gastwirth.  The Estimation of the Lorenz Curve and Gini Index , 1972 .

[27]  G. Barnett,et al.  Comparing the NRC and the Faculty Hiring Network Methods of Ranking Doctoral Programs in Communication , 2011 .

[28]  V. Burris.  The Academic Caste System: Prestige Hierarchies in PhD Exchange Networks , 2004 .