In sweet harmony or in bitter discord? How cultural values and stakeholder requirements shape and users read an urban computing technology

Culture is, in many ways, implicated in and shapes technology design and use. Inspired by Stuart Hall’s conception of encoding/decoding, we maintain that technological artefacts reflect the cultural values of their creators, while users, in their encounters with the technological artefacts, may decode those artefacts in various ways that are shaped by the users’ cultural values. In this article, we apply this lens to study a decade-long urban computing project that took place in the wild. We focus on the project’s development team and on how their cultural values shape technology design. We also acknowledge that such an urban computing project involves many other stakeholder groups that affect the course of events. In our analysis, we examine how these stakeholders shaped and interpreted the technology in question. Although the development project had a seemingly generic “for all” ethos, the various stakeholders pulled the focus in different directions. The trajectory of the project can be characterized as reacting to these competing influences—sometimes achieving fit, while other times resulting in conflicts. The contribution of this paper is a structured analysis and reflections on cultural issues in community technology design in the wild, with a focus on the role of the developers’ cultural values and other stakeholders’ technology-related requirements and interpretations. This study has implications for subsequent studies in the wild by framing them as fluid settings of a great variety of stakeholders with a multiplicity of values, requirements, and interpretations.

[1]  P. Bohannan Cultural Anthropology , 2020, Nature.

[2]  Alfred G. Meyer,et al.  Culture, a critical review of concepts and definitions , 1953 .

[3]  A. Kroeber,et al.  Culture, a critical review of concepts and definitions , 1953 .

[4]  R. Evans,et al.  Reliability of the "Draw-a-Man" test. , 1975 .

[5]  C. Geertz The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays , 1975 .

[6]  S. Barley,et al.  Occupational Communities: Culture and Control in Organizations , 1982 .

[7]  L. Smircich Concepts of Culture and Organizational Analysis. , 1983 .

[8]  J. Clifford,et al.  Writing culture : the poetics and politics of ethnography : a School of American Research advanced seminar , 1986 .

[9]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[10]  E. Schein Organizational Culture and Leadership , 1991 .

[11]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[12]  Deborah Dougherty,et al.  Exploring Complex Organizations: A Cultural Perspective. , 1992 .

[13]  B. Mark Organizational culture. , 1996, Annual review of nursing research.

[14]  R. Keesing Cultural Anthropology: A Contemporary Perspective , 1997 .

[15]  Steve Woolgar,et al.  The Machine at Work: Technology, Work and Organization , 1997 .

[16]  A. Korver,et al.  Theories of Organization , 1998 .

[17]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[18]  E. Wenger Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[19]  Sherry B. Ortner The fate of "culture" : Geertz and beyond , 1999 .

[20]  E. W. Gould,et al.  Crosscurrents: cultural dimensions and global Web user-interface design , 2000, INTR.

[21]  Stuart Hall,et al.  Culture, Media, Language: Working Papers in Cultural Studies, 1972-79 , 2003 .

[22]  S. Hewa Medical technology: A pandora's box? , 1994, The Journal of medical humanities.

[23]  Mark Srite,et al.  Information technology and culture: Identifying fragmentary and holistic perspectives of culture , 2005, Inf. Organ..

[24]  Marja Jylhä,et al.  Alcohol in life story interviews with Finnish people aged 90 or over: Stories of gendered morality , 2005 .

[25]  Helen Nissenbaum,et al.  Values at play: design tradeoffs in socially-oriented game design , 2005, CHI.

[26]  Netta Iivari Usability Specialists - 'A Mommy Mob', 'Realistic Humanists' or 'Staid Researchers'? An Analysis of Usability Work in the Software Product Development , 2005, INTERACT.

[27]  Netta Iivari,et al.  'Representing the User' in software development - a cultural analysis of usability work in the product development context , 2006, Interact. Comput..

[28]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  The qualitative interview in IS research: Examining the craft , 2007, Inf. Organ..

[29]  Alfons van Marrewijk,et al.  Managing project culture: The case of environment mega-project , 2007 .

[30]  Jessica K. Miller,et al.  Value tensions in design: the value sensitive design, development, and appropriation of a corporation's groupware system , 2007, GROUP.

[31]  Mian M. Ajmal,et al.  Knowledge Transfer in Project-Based Organizations: An Organizational Culture Perspective , 2008 .

[32]  Marko Jurmu,et al.  UBI-Hotspot 1.0: Large-Scale Long-Term Deployment of Interactive Public Displays in a City Center , 2010, 2010 Fifth International Conference on Internet and Web Applications and Services.

[33]  Netta Iivari,et al.  Culturally Compatible Usability Work: An Interpretive Case Study on the Relationship between Usability Work and Its Cultural Context in Software Product Development Organizations , 2010, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[34]  Kim Halskov,et al.  Designing urban media façades: cases and challenges , 2010, CHI.

[35]  Kim Halskov,et al.  Rekindling values in participatory design , 2010, PDC '10.

[36]  Keith Cheverst,et al.  Creating a rural community display with local engagement , 2010, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[37]  Nigel Davies,et al.  Reflections on the long-term use of an experimental digital signage system , 2011, UbiComp '11.

[38]  K. Chamberlain,et al.  Timelining: visualizing experience , 2011 .

[39]  Juhani Iivari,et al.  The relationship between organizational culture and the deployment of agile methods , 2011, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[40]  Silvia Lindtner,et al.  Cultural appropriation: information technologies as sites of transnational imagination , 2012, CSCW.

[41]  Keith Cheverst,et al.  The Design, Deployment and Evaluation of Situated Display-Based Systems to Support Coordination and Community , 2012, Ubiquitous Display Environments.

[42]  Nigel Davies,et al.  Reflections on Long-Term Experiments with Public Displays , 2012, Computer.

[43]  Florian Alt,et al.  Looking glass: a field study on noticing interactivity of a shop window , 2012, CHI.

[44]  Johanna Ylipulli,et al.  “Realities behind ICT Dreams” : Designing a Ubiquitous City in a Living Lab Environment , 2012 .

[45]  Ryan Shaun Joazeiro de Baker,et al.  Collaboration in cognitive tutor use in latin America: field study and design recommendations , 2012, CHI.

[46]  Keith Cheverst,et al.  Supporting Community Awareness with Interactive Displays , 2012, Computer.

[47]  Hanne Kirstine Adriansen,et al.  Timeline interviews: A tool for conducting life history research , 2012 .

[48]  Patrick Olivier,et al.  Leaving the wild: lessons from community technology handovers , 2013, CHI.

[49]  Johanna Ylipulli,et al.  the meshwork of a technologised city Contesting ubicomp visions through ICT practices: Power negotiations in , 2013 .

[50]  Keith Cheverst,et al.  P-LAYERS -- A Layered Framework Addressing the Multifaceted Issues Facing Community-Supporting Public Display Deployments , 2013, TCHI.

[51]  Timo Ojala,et al.  Winter is coming: introducing climate sensitive urban computing , 2014, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[52]  T. Ojala,et al.  From cyberpunk to calm urban computing: Exploring the role of technology in the future cityscape , 2014 .

[53]  Timo Ojala,et al.  Municipal WiFi and interactive displays: Appropriation of new technologies in public urban spaces , 2014 .

[54]  Amalia G. Sabiescu,et al.  Emerging spaces in community-based participatory design: reflections from two case studies , 2014, PDC.

[55]  Simona Giorgi,et al.  The Many Faces of Culture: Making Sense of 30 Years of Research on Culture in Organization Studies , 2015 .

[56]  Heike Winschiers-Theophilus,et al.  Reducing "white elephant" ICT4D projects: a community-researcher engagement , 2015, C&T.

[57]  Leena Kuure,et al.  Infrastructuring as Social Action , 2015, ICIS.

[58]  Nemanja Memarovic,et al.  Understanding future challenges for networked public display systems in community settings , 2015, C&T.

[59]  Leena Kuure,et al.  Do we speak the same language?: design goals and culture clashes in an online forum for young people , 2015, C&T.

[60]  Anna Ståhlbröst,et al.  Stakeholders in Smart City Living Lab Processes , 2015, AMCIS.

[61]  Netta Iivari,et al.  It's a Pain in the... Wild?: Struggling to Create Conditions for Emerging Practices in an Urban Computing Project , 2016, NordiCHI.

[62]  B. Yousman Encoding/Decoding , 2019, The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology.