Cue and context conditioning of defensive behaviors to cat odor stimuli

Exposure of rats to a cat odor block in a previously familiarized situation was followed by three extinction days to the same or a different situation, and with or without an identical but odor-free block, and, testing in the original apparatus with an odor-free block (cue). Initial exposure produced risk assessment (stretch attend), avoidance of the block, and crouch/freeze with sniffing/head movements. Avoidance continued during extinction, but context-only exposed rats showed predominantly crouch/freeze with sniff/head movements, while rats exposed to the context+cue showed higher levels of stretch attend. During the test day, rats exposed to the cue during extinction showed reduced defensive responding compared to those not extinguished with the cue, but context extinction had less effect, possibly due in part to initial familiarization with the situation. These data indicate that both cue and context conditioning to cat odor did occur, and that the type of conditioned stimulus (context-only vs. context+cue) influenced the type of defensive behaviors elicited by this stimulus, although the all animals received the same conditioning protocol. Particular behaviors disappeared at different rates during extinction, with avoidance the most persistent. However, in this context there was no incentive for approach behaviors inconsistent with avoidance, and stretch attend behaviors could and did occur while subjects were located far from the block or the area in which it had been encountered. In addition, immobile crouch/freeze did not occur at higher than control levels, while the crouch/freeze activities that did increase incorporated sensory sampling in a relevant modality (sniffing/head movements). Thus, the behaviors seen to the conditioned stimulus appeared to reflect combinations of different defense strategies, appropriate to the type of conditioned stimulus and responsive to its extinction. Differences between these data and those from studies using fecal predator odorants suggest that the latter may not elicit a complete range of conditioned defenses.

[1]  K P Ossenkopp,et al.  Brief predator odour exposure activates the HPA axis independent of locomotor changes. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[2]  W. G. Whitehouse,et al.  The effect of number and minimum duration of post-response-prevention escapes on the resistance to extinction of an avoidance response , 1984 .

[3]  R. Dielenberg,et al.  Low-Dose Midazolam Attenuates Predatory Odor Avoidance in Rats , 1999, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[4]  M. Kavaliers,et al.  Reduction of predator odor-induced anxiety in mice by the neurosteroid 3α-hydroxy-4-pregnen-20-one (3αHP) , 1994, Brain Research.

[5]  M. Kavaliers,et al.  Decreased predator avoidance in parasitized mice: neuromodulatory correlates , 1995, Parasitology.

[6]  S. File,et al.  Dissociation between behavioral and corticosterone responses on repeated exposures to cat odor , 1993, Physiology & Behavior.

[7]  S. File,et al.  Responders and nonresponders to cat odor do not differ in other tests of anxiety , 1994, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[8]  M. Kavaliers,et al.  Influence of a natural stressor (predator odor) on locomotor activity in the meadow vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus): modulation by sex, reproductive condition and gonadal hormones , 2000, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[9]  Guy Sandner,et al.  Associative learning and latent inhibition in a conditioned suppression paradigm in humans , 2000, Behavioural Brain Research.

[10]  D. Blanchard,et al.  The effects of ethanol and diazepam on reactions to predatory odors , 1990, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[11]  J. Radulovic,et al.  Relationship between Fos Production and Classical Fear Conditioning: Effects of Novelty, Latent Inhibition, and Unconditioned Stimulus Preexposure , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  M. Kavaliers,et al.  Opioid and non-opioid NMDA-mediated predator-induced analgesia in mice and the effects of parasitic infection , 1997, Brain Research.

[13]  D. Blanchard,et al.  Sex effects in defensive behavior: Baseline differences and drug interactions , 1991, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[14]  M. Fanselow.  The adaptive function of conditioned defensive behavior: an ecological approach to Pavlovian stimulus-substitution theory , 1989 .

[15]  M. Bouton,et al.  Learning, motivation, and cognition : the functional behaviorism of Robert C. Bolles , 1997 .

[16]  R. Dielenberg,et al.  Habituation of the hiding response to cat odor in rats (Rattus norvegicus). , 1999, Journal of comparative psychology.

[17]  R. Roth,et al.  TMT, a predator odor, elevates mesoprefrontal dopamine metabolic activity and disrupts short-term working memory in the rat , 2000, Brain Research Bulletin.

[18]  D. Blanchard,et al.  Ethoexperimental approaches to the study of behavior , 1989 .

[19]  S. Mineka.  The effects of overtraining on flooding of jump-up and shuttlebox avoidance responses , 1978 .

[20]  H. Anisman,et al.  Neural plasticity, neuropeptides and anxiety in animals — implications for understanding and treating affective disorder following traumatic stress in humans , 1998, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[21]  D. Blanchard,et al.  “Paradoxical” effects of morphine on antipredator defense reactions in wild and laboratory rats , 1991, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[22]  D. Macdonald,et al.  Physiological Response of the European Hedgehog to Predator and Nonpredator Odour , 1996, Physiology & Behavior.

[23]  D. Blanchard,et al.  Antipredator defensive behaviors in a visible burrow system. , 1989, Journal of comparative psychology.

[24]  R. Dielenberg,et al.  Differential anxiolytic efficacy of a benzodiazepine on first versus second exposure to a predatory odor in rats , 1999, Psychopharmacology.

[25]  S. File,et al.  Habituation and generalization of phobic responses to cat odor , 1994, Brain Research Bulletin.

[26]  Jon L. Williams,et al.  Effects of cat exposure and cat odors on subsequent amphetamine-induced stereotypy , 1990, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[27]  E. D. Kemble,et al.  Immediate and Long-Term Effects of Novel Odors on Risk Assessment in Mice , 1997, Physiology & Behavior.

[28]  E. D. Kemble,et al.  Yohimbine Increases Novel Odor-Induced Risk Assessment Behaviors , 1996 .

[29]  C. H. Vanderwolf,et al.  Components of weasel and fox odors elicit fast wave bursts in the dentate gyrus of rats , 1994, Behavioural Brain Research.

[30]  J. Rosen,et al.  Predator odor as an unconditioned fear stimulus in rats: elicitation of freezing by trimethylthiazoline, a component of fox feces. , 2000, Behavioral neuroscience.

[31]  G. Griebel,et al.  Differentiation of anxiolytic and panicolytic drugs by effects on rat and mouse defense test batteries , 1997, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[32]  J. Pinel,et al.  Adaptive interactions of rats with dangerous inaminate objects: support for a cognitive theory of defensive behavior , 1989 .

[33]  J. Slangen,et al.  Animal Models in Psychopharmacology , 1991, APS: Advances in Pharmacological Sciences.

[34]  M. Denny.  Post-aversive relief and relaxation and their implications for behavior therapy , 1976 .

[35]  S. File,et al.  Behavioral consequences in animal tests of anxiety and exploration of exposure to cat odor , 1992, Brain Research Bulletin.

[36]  R. Roth,et al.  The predator odor, TMT, displays a unique, stress-like pattern of dopaminergic and endocrinological activation in the rat , 2000, Brain Research.

[37]  Duncan C. Blanchard,et al.  Risk assessment in animal models of anxiety , 1991 .

[38]  S. File,et al.  Chlordiazepoxide reduces the generalised anxiety, but not the direct responses, of rats exposed to cat odor , 1992, Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior.