Use of backward slip to predict falls in friction test protocols

Abstract In standard friction test protocols, backward slip in the takeoff phase is not considered because it is not believed to offer additional information about the prediction of slips and falls. A possible reason for the exclusion was because conventional slips and falls studies have used walking surface and shoe combinations that have a relatively high coefficient of friction. However, a normal gait pattern cannot be maintained when the frictional characteristics of a floor are low, and therefore there may be other measures of gait performance that are better predictors of loss of balance in extremely low frictional conditions. Therefore, a new approach, namely “backward slip” in the takeoff phase, was used to predict loss of balance when the frictional characteristics of a floor are low. As a result, dangerous falls initiated by backward slip were observed in this study, in contrast to the absence of backward slips in conventional studies. In addition, the conditional probability and logistic regression results showed backward slip in the takeoff phase could be an alternative measure in predicting dangerous falls because no significant difference was found between backward slip and forward slip in the prediction of dangerous falls. Relevance to industry By incorporating backward slip in predicting floor slipperiness, floor slipperiness on lower frictional floors, characterized by abnormal gait patterns, can be measured, and tighter criteria regarding safe floor surfaces can be enacted to prevent workers from dangerous slips and falls.

[1]  T B Leamon,et al.  Occupational slips and falls: more than a trivial problem. , 1995, Ergonomics.

[2]  H.Harvey Cohen,et al.  Slip and fall accident prevention: A review of research, practice, and regulations , 1995 .

[3]  W R Chang,et al.  The role of friction in the measurement of slipperiness, Part 1: Friction mechanisms and definition of test conditions , 2001, Ergonomics.

[4]  R. Waters,et al.  Energy‐speed relationship of walking: Standard tables , 1988, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[5]  L Strandberg,et al.  On accident analysis and slip-resistance measurement. , 1983, Ergonomics.

[6]  Lennart Strandberg,et al.  The dynamics of slipping accidents , 1981 .

[7]  G. Street Biomechanics IX-B , 1985 .

[8]  W R Chang,et al.  The role of friction in the measurement of slipperiness, Part 2: Survey of friction measurement devices , 2001, Ergonomics.

[9]  Amit Bhattacharya,et al.  Occupational ergonomics : theory and applications , 1996 .

[10]  D. Winter Biomechanics of Human Movement , 1980 .

[11]  M. P. Wilson,et al.  Slip resistance testing of shoes — new developments , 1983 .

[12]  R Grönqvist,et al.  An apparatus and a method for determining the slip resistance of shoes and floors by simulation of human foot motions. , 1989, Ergonomics.

[13]  M S Redfern,et al.  Predicting slips and falls considering required and available friction. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[14]  T. M. Owings,et al.  Foot displacement but not velocity predicts the outcome of a slip induced in young subjects while walking. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  Mp Wilson,et al.  Development of SATRA Slip Test and Tread Pattern Design Guidelines , 1990 .

[16]  R Myung,et al.  The effect of load carrying and floor contaminants on slip and fall parameters. , 1997, Ergonomics.

[17]  P. J. Perkins,et al.  Measurement of Slip Between the Shoe and Ground During Walking , 1978 .