Exploring and measuring differences in person–thing orientations

Abstract Individuals differ in their orientation toward aspects of the environment. Previous work suggests that some individuals orient primarily toward people, whereas others orient toward things. Women generally orient towards people more than men, and men orient towards things more than women. Person–thing orientation is related to occupational choices. This research examined the structure of person–thing orientation using a combination of exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses and structural equation modeling. Analyses suggested that thing orientation and person orientation can be measured (1) with a few items; (2) separately from each other; and (3) person orientation and thing orientation are not necessarily bipolar opposites.

[1]  Brad E. Sheese,et al.  Attraction, personality, and prejudice: liking none of the people most of the time. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  R. MacCallum,et al.  Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. , 1996 .

[3]  J. Rounds,et al.  Development and initial validation of brief public domain RIASEC marker scales , 2008 .

[4]  L. Tucker,et al.  A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis , 1973 .

[5]  J. M. Digman,et al.  Factors In The Natural Language Of Personality: Re-Analysis, Comparison, And Interpretation Of Six Major Studies. , 1981, Multivariate behavioral research.

[6]  S. Srivastava,et al.  The Big Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. , 1999 .

[7]  V. Benet‐Martínez,et al.  Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. , 2006, Annual review of psychology.

[8]  P. Bentler,et al.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  Patrick Ian Armstrong,et al.  Men and things, women and people: a meta-analysis of sex differences in interests. , 2009, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[11]  O. John,et al.  Handbook of personality: Theory and research, 2nd ed. , 1999 .

[12]  R. Cattell,et al.  A comparison of the personality profile (16 P.F.) of eminent researchers with that of eminent teachers and administrators, and of the general population. , 1955, British journal of psychology.

[13]  Dale J. Prediger Dimensions Underlying Holland's Hexagon: Missing Link between Interests and Occupations?. , 1982 .

[14]  J. S. Long,et al.  Testing Structural Equation Models , 1993 .