Complex topology rather than complex membership is a determinant of protein dosage sensitivity

[1]  A. Barabasi,et al.  High-Quality Binary Protein Interaction Map of the Yeast Interactome Network , 2008, Science.

[2]  E. Shakhnovich,et al.  Constraints imposed by non-functional protein–protein interactions on gene expression and proteome size , 2008, Molecular systems biology.

[3]  John Kuriyan,et al.  The origin of protein interactions and allostery in colocalization , 2007, Nature.

[4]  I. Ispolatov,et al.  Propagation of large concentration changes in reversible protein-binding networks , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  L. Hurst,et al.  Evolution of chromosome organization driven by selection for reduced gene expression noise , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[6]  Gianni Cesareni,et al.  WI‐PHI: A weighted yeast interactome enriched for direct physical interactions , 2007, Proteomics.

[7]  Sean R. Collins,et al.  Toward a Comprehensive Atlas of the Physical Interactome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae*S , 2007, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[8]  A. Arkin,et al.  From Fluctuations to Phenotypes: The Physiology of Noise , 2006, Science's STKE.

[9]  M. Tyers,et al.  Stratus Not Altocumulus: A New View of the Yeast Protein Interaction Network , 2006, PLoS biology.

[10]  J. Derisi,et al.  Single-cell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise , 2006, Nature.

[11]  P. Bork,et al.  Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery , 2006, Nature.

[12]  Sean R. Collins,et al.  Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2006, Nature.

[13]  T. Hughes,et al.  Mapping pathways and phenotypes by systematic gene overexpression. , 2006, Molecular cell.

[14]  Alan Saghatelian,et al.  Erratum: Corrigendum: Assignment of protein function in the postgenomic era , 2005, Nature chemical biology.

[15]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  Mechanisms of Haploinsufficiency Revealed by Genome-Wide Profiling in Yeast , 2005, Genetics.

[16]  A. E. Hirsh,et al.  Noise Minimization in Eukaryotic Gene Expression , 2004, PLoS biology.

[17]  Joshua M. Stuart,et al.  A Gene-Coexpression Network for Global Discovery of Conserved Genetic Modules , 2003, Science.

[18]  C. Pál,et al.  Dosage sensitivity and the evolution of gene families in yeast , 2003, Nature.

[19]  R. Veitia,et al.  Nonlinear effects in macromolecular assembly and dosage sensitivity. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[20]  R. Veitia,et al.  Exploring the etiology of haploinsufficiency. , 2002, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[21]  J. Ferrell What Do Scaffold Proteins Really Do? , 2000, Science's STKE.

[22]  D. Eisenberg,et al.  Protein function in the post-genomic era , 2000, Nature.

[23]  Jehoshua Bruck,et al.  Scaffold proteins may biphasically affect the levels of mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling and reduce its threshold properties. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  W. R. Burack,et al.  Signal transduction: hanging on a scaffold. , 2000, Current opinion in cell biology.

[25]  C. Dean,et al.  Environmental-Dependent Acceleration of a Developmental Switch: The Floral Transition , 2000, Science's STKE.

[26]  D. Bray,et al.  Computer-based analysis of the binding steps in protein complex formation. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  D. Bray,et al.  A computer program for the analysis of protein complex formation , 1997, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[28]  A. Cornish-Bowden,et al.  Concentration of MgATP2- and other ions in solution. Calculation of the true concentrations of species present in mixtures of associating ions. , 1976, The Biochemical journal.

[29]  Dmitrij Frishman,et al.  MIPS: analysis and annotation of proteins from whole genomes in 2005 , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[30]  Marc Vidal,et al.  Interactome modeling , 2005, FEBS letters.