Ability of Density Feature in Low-Dose Computed Tomography for Evaluating Screened Lung Tumor

To explore the diagnostic value of density features in lung tumor screened from low dose computed tomography (LDCT) with thin section. A computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system was established to assist in defining tumor and density features. Forty-eight surgically confirmed tumors in 38 patients screened by thin-section LDCT were retrospectively enrolled in consecutive manner to examine the performance of this system. The confirmed surgical results included 29 malignant and 19 benign tumors. The pathology of malignancy were adenocarcinoma (AdCa, n=17) and adenocarcinoma in situ (AdIs, n=12). The benignancy included atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH, n=11) and benign non-AAH (n=8). Of density features, tumor Entropy provided the best power to differentiate malignancy from benignancy (p<;0.001), and further to classify the 4-type histopathology (p<;0.001). Feature Entropy has limitation in differentiating AdIs from benign non-AAH, which can be improved using feature of tumor disappearance rate (TDR) and Mean. Entropy and TDR were determined to be best decisive factors in constructing the CAD prediction model, which predicted tumors between malignancy and benignancy with an Az of 0.913. Density features defined using CAD is useful to differentiate malignancy from benignancy of lung tumors screened using thin-section multi-detector LDCT, and further to predict histopathology.

[1]  K. Doi,et al.  Malignant versus benign nodules at CT screening for lung cancer: comparison of thin-section CT findings. , 2004, Radiology.

[2]  Morihito Okada,et al.  Discrepancy of computed tomographic image between lung and mediastinal windows as a prognostic implication in small lung adenocarcinoma. , 2003, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[3]  Takashi Ohtsuka,et al.  Differentiating between atypical adenomatous hyperplasia and bronchioloalveolar carcinoma using the computed tomography number histogram. , 2003, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[4]  Kenji Suzuki,et al.  Pathologic N0 status in pulmonary adenocarcinoma is predictable by combining serum carcinoembryonic antigen level and computed tomographic findings. , 2001, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[5]  Paul Pinsky,et al.  Baseline findings of a randomized feasibility trial of lung cancer screening with spiral CT scan vs chest radiograph: the Lung Screening Study of the National Cancer Institute. , 2004, Chest.

[6]  B. Zheng,et al.  Pulmonary nodule detection with low-dose CT of the lung: agreement among radiologists. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  W. Travis,et al.  The new World Health Organization classification of lung tumours , 2001, European Respiratory Journal.

[8]  F. Fischbach,et al.  Detection of pulmonary nodules by multislice computed tomography: improved detection rate with reduced slice thickness , 2003, European Radiology.

[9]  Charles S White National Lung Screening Trial: a breakthrough in lung cancer screening? , 2011, Journal of thoracic imaging.

[10]  Luc Vincent,et al.  Watersheds in Digital Spaces: An Efficient Algorithm Based on Immersion Simulations , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[11]  S M Pincus,et al.  Approximate entropy as a measure of system complexity. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  K. Ligon,et al.  Epidermal growth factor receptor gene amplification in atypical adenomatous hyperplasia of the lung. , 2010, American journal of translational research.

[13]  D. Lynch,et al.  The National Lung Screening Trial: overview and study design. , 2011, Radiology.

[14]  M. Chasen,et al.  Concepts in computed tomography of the thorax. , 1986, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[15]  Y. Yamashita,et al.  Differential diagnosis of ground-glass opacity nodules: CT number analysis by three-dimensional computerized quantification. , 2007, Chest.

[16]  Harry J de Koning,et al.  Impact of computed tomography screening for lung cancer on participants in a randomized controlled trial (NELSON trial) , 2008, Cancer.

[17]  N. Otsu A threshold selection method from gray level histograms , 1979 .

[18]  Kavita Garg,et al.  Lung cancer: interobserver agreement on interpretation of pulmonary findings at low-dose CT screening. , 2008, Radiology.

[19]  J. Goo,et al.  Usefulness of concurrent reading using thin-section and thick-section CT images in subcentimetre solitary pulmonary nodules. , 2009, Clinical radiology.

[20]  Norihiro Kikuchi,et al.  Prognostic value of tumor disappearance rate on computed tomography in advanced-stage lung adenocarcinoma. , 2007, Clinical lung cancer.

[21]  M. Okada,et al.  Associations among bronchioloalveolar carcinoma components, positron emission tomographic and computed tomographic findings, and malignant behavior in small lung adenocarcinomas. , 2007, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[22]  T M Yelbuz,et al.  Pulmonary nodules: experimental and clinical studies at low-dose CT. , 1999, Radiology.

[23]  M. Okada,et al.  Correlation between computed tomographic findings, bronchioloalveolar carcinoma component, and biologic behavior of small-sized lung adenocarcinomas. , 2004, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.