Co‐research with adults with intellectual disability: A systematic review

BACKGROUND Co-research with people with intellectual disability is a distinct form of patient and public involvement (PPI). This systematic review summarize published studies and protocols to report on the process of co-research in social and healthcare research. METHOD Relevant studies were identified using electronic searches on ASSIA, PsycInfo and MedLine. Study quality was assessed, and information relevant to the process of working with co-researchers was extracted and thematically analysed. RESULTS Thirteen studies were retrieved. Data are reported under three themes: (i) challenges of co-research; (ii) facilitators of co-research; (iii) benefits of co-research. Best practice is presented as a model of co-research. Content analysis on 12 research protocols identified four themes related to PPI. CONCLUSIONS All stakeholders involved in co-research with people with intellectual disability can benefit, providing there is adequate infrastructure to accommodate and empower the co-researchers. Many current intellectual disability research projects still lack systematic involvement of PPI members.

[1]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[2]  I. Crombie,et al.  ‘Carers’ of People with Mental Health Problems: Proposals in Current Public Mental Health Policy in Nine Countries , 2007, Journal of public health policy.

[3]  J. Frankham.  Partnership research: a review of approaches and challenges in conducting research in partnership with service users , 2009 .

[4]  G. Miller,et al.  Setting up participatory research: a discussion of the initial stages , 2003 .

[5]  A. Sayers.  Tips and tricks in performing a systematic review. , 2008, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[6]  J. Conder,et al.  Reflections on a participatory project: The rewards and challenges for the lead researchers , 2011, Journal of intellectual & developmental disability.

[7]  Melanie Nind,et al.  What is Inclusive Research , 2014 .

[8]  G. Grant,et al.  Valuing people and research: the learning disability research initiative - Overview report , 2007 .

[9]  R. Chapman.  An exploration of the self-advocacy support role through collaborative research: 'there should never be a them and us'. , 2014, Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID.

[10]  T. Williamson,et al.  Impact of public involvement in research on quality of life and society: a case study of research career trajectories , 2010 .

[11]  Murna Downs,et al.  The Emergence of the Person in Dementia Research , 1997, Ageing and Society.

[12]  J. Walmsley.  Involving users with learning difficulties in health improvement: lessons from inclusive learning disability research. , 2004, Nursing inquiry.

[13]  M. Stevenson.  Participatory data analysis alongside co-researchers who have Down syndrome. , 2014, Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID.

[14]  M. Barnes,et al.  Well-being in old age: findings from participatory research , 2012 .

[15]  Theresa F Moore,et al.  Giving Voice to Persons Living With Dementia: The Researcher’s Opportunities and Challenges , 2003, Nursing science quarterly.

[16]  Therese M. Cumming,et al.  Building an inclusive research team: the importance of team building and skills training. , 2014, Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID.

[17]  P. O'brien,et al.  Co-researching with people who have intellectual disabilities: insights from a national survey. , 2014, Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID.

[18]  J. Manthorpe,et al.  Co-production in mental health research: reflections from the People Study , 2015 .

[19]  A. Langston.  User Controlled Research: Its Meanings and Potential , 2006 .

[20]  M. Pimbert,et al.  The SAGE Handbook of Action Research , 2008 .

[21]  K. McDonald,et al.  Nothing About Us Without Us: Does Action Research in Developmental Disabilities Research Measure Up? , 2014 .

[22]  K. Bunning,et al.  Co‐production and pilot of a structured interview using Talking Mats® to survey the television viewing habits and preferences of adults and young people with learning disabilities , 2017 .

[23]  Butler Gary,et al.  Doing it together (DM Special Issue) , 2012 .

[24]  Martin Orrell,et al.  A synthesis of the evidence on peer research with potentially vulnerable adults: how this relates to dementia , 2017, International journal of geriatric psychiatry.

[25]  D. Felce,et al.  Initial findings on the involvement of people with an intellectual disability in interviewing their peers about quality of life , 2004 .

[26]  J. Hammel,et al.  Following Through to the End: The Use of Inclusive Strategies to Analyse and Interpret Data in Participatory Action Research with Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities , 2011 .

[27]  Melanie Nind,et al.  Doing research inclusively, doing research well? , 2012 .

[28]  C. Philo,et al.  What Effect Does Transition Have on Health and Well‐Being in Young People with Intellectual Disabilities? A Systematic Review , 2017, Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID.

[29]  Val Williams,et al.  More researching together: the role of nondisabled researchers in working with People First members1 , 2005 .

[30]  M. Clark.  Co-production in mental health care , 2015 .

[31]  C. Barnes.  ‘Emancipatory disability research’: project or process? , 2004 .

[32]  Paul Abberley.  The Politics of Disablement , 1992 .

[33]  J. Blacher,et al.  Quality of life for young adults with severe intellectual disability: mothers’ thoughts and reflections , 2004 .

[34]  ‘Standing up for my human rights’: a group’s journey beyond consultation towards co‐production , 2012 .

[35]  Shekhar Saxena,et al.  Prevalence of intellectual disability: a meta-analysis of population-based studies. , 2011, Research in developmental disabilities.

[36]  Barbara Daniel.  Working with older women , 1997 .

[37]  J. Bergold,et al.  Participatory Research Methods: A Methodological Approach in Motion , 2012 .

[38]  Susan Woldenberg Butler.  Tips and tricks in performing a systematic review , 2007 .

[39]  R. Bartlett.  Citizenship in action: the lived experiences of citizens with dementia who campaign for social change , 2014 .

[40]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[41]  Jan Dewing,et al.  From Ritual to Relationship , 2002 .

[42]  G. Hubbard,et al.  Exploring Innovative Ways of Seeking the Views of Older People in Health and Social Care Research , 2003 .

[43]  L. L. McIntyre,et al.  Quality of life for young adults with mental retardation during transition. , 2003, Mental retardation.

[44]  A. Marriott,et al.  Shaping our future: a scoping and consultation exercise to establish research priorities in learning disabilities for the next ten years , 2008 .

[45]  Paula Mitchell,et al.  Follow the Yellow Brick Road! People with Learning Difficulties as Co‐researchers , 1997 .

[46]  P. Ramcharan,et al.  A collaborative group method of inclusive research. , 2014, Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID.

[47]  Challenges and Strategies in Collaborative Working with Service User Researchers: Reflections from the Academic Researcher , 2006 .

[48]  William S. Curran,et al.  A/I: a synthesis , 1982, ACM-SE 20.