Preliminary results of an automatic channel fault detection system on a small animal APD-based digital PET scanner

APD-based positron emission tomography scanners show enhanced imaging capabilities in terms of spatial resolution and contrast due to the one to one coupling and size of individual crystal-APD detectors. However, to ensure maximum performance, these PET scanners require proper calibration by qualified professionals, which can become a cumbersome task because of the large number of channels present. An intelligent system (IS) intends to alleviate this workload by enabling a diagnosis of the observational errors of the scanner. The IS can be broken down into four hierarchical blocks: parameter extraction, channel fault detection, prioritization and diagnosis. One of the main function of the IS consists of analyzing available channel data such as: normalization coincidence counts and single count rates, crystal identification classification data, energy histograms, APD bias and noise thresholds to establish the channel's health status that will be used to detect channel faults. This paper focuses on the first two blocks of the IS: parameter extraction and channel fault detection. The purpose of the parameter extraction block is to process available channel data into parameters that are subsequently used by the fault detection block to generate the channel's health status. To ensure extensibility, the channel fault detection block is divided into indicators representing different aspects of the PET scanner performance: sensitivity, timing, identification and energy. Some experiments on a LabPET scanner located at the Sherbrooke Molecular Imaging Center demonstrated an erroneous channel fault detection rate of 6% (with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of: [5, 6]) which is considered tolerable. Globally, the IS achieves a channel fault detection efficiency of 95% (CI: [92, 97]), which proves many faults can be detected automatically. Increased fault detection efficiency would be advantageous but, the achieved results would already benefit professionals in their maintenance task.

[1]  R Matheoud,et al.  Five-year experience of quality control for a 3D LSO-based whole-body PET scanner: results and considerations. , 2012, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[2]  T. Martin McGinnity,et al.  Fault diagnosis of electronic systems using intelligent techniques: a review , 2001, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C.

[3]  A. Kazarov,et al.  Use of Expert system and Data Analysis Technologies in automation of error detection, diagnosis and recovery for ATLAS Trigger-DAQ Control framework , 2012, 2012 18th IEEE-NPSS Real Time Conference.

[4]  I. Sgura,et al.  The ALICE-HMPID Detector Control System: Its evolution towards an expert and adaptive system , 2011 .

[5]  R. Fontaine,et al.  Performance evaluation of the LabPET™ APD-based digital PET scanner , 2009, 2007 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[6]  R. Fontaine,et al.  The Hardware and Signal Processing Architecture of LabPET™, a Small Animal APD-Based Digital PET Scanner , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[7]  Hiroshi Fukuda,et al.  Long-term performance evaluation of positron emission tomography: analysis and proposal of a maintenance protocol for long-term utilization , 2010, Annals of nuclear medicine.

[8]  R. Fontaine,et al.  Digital signal processing applied to crystal identification in Positron Emission Tomography dedicated to small animals , 2007 .

[9]  Larissa Njejimana,et al.  Design of a Real-Time FPGA-Based Data Acquisition Architecture for the LabPET II: An APD-Based Scanner Dedicated to Small Animal PET Imaging , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[10]  Christian Thibaudeau,et al.  LabPET II, an APD-based PET detector module with counting CT imaging capability , 2011, 2011 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[11]  Steffen Leonhardt,et al.  Methods of fault diagnosis , 1997 .

[12]  Gary Riley,et al.  C Language Integrated Production System (CLIPS) , 1990 .

[13]  D. A. Linkens,et al.  Generic system architecture for supervisory fuzzy control , 1994 .

[14]  A. Goshaw The ATLAS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider , 2008 .

[15]  I A Basheer,et al.  Artificial neural networks: fundamentals, computing, design, and application. , 2000, Journal of microbiological methods.

[16]  Z. L. Matthews,et al.  The ALICE experiment at the CERN LHC , 2008 .

[17]  G. Aad,et al.  The ATLAS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collide , 2008 .