Contextualising mainstreaming of disaster resilience concepts in the construction process

Purpose Construction industry and the built environment professions play an important role in contributing to society’s improved resilience. It is therefore important to improve their knowledgebase to strengthen their capacities. This paper aims to identify gaps in the knowledgebase of construction professionals that are undermining their ability to contribute to the development of a more disaster resilient society. The paper also provides a series of recommendations to key actors in the built environment on how to more effectively mainstream disaster resilience in the construction process. Design/methodology/approach The paper reports the findings of 87 stakeholder interviews with: national and local government organisations; the community; non-governmental organisations, international non-governmental organisation and other international agencies; academia and research organisations; and the private sector, which were supplemented by a comprehensive analysis of key policies related to disaster resilience and management. The findings were validated using focus group discussions that were conducted as part of six organised stakeholder workshops. Findings The primary and secondary data generated a long list of needs and skills. Finally, the identified needs and skills were combined “like-for-like” to produce broader knowledge gaps. Some of the key knowledge gaps identified are: governance, legal frameworks and compliance; business continuity management; disaster response; contracts and procurement; resilience technologies, engineering and infrastructure; knowledge management; social and cultural awareness; sustainability and resilience; ethics and human rights; innovative financing mechanisms; multi stakeholder approach, inclusion and empowerment; post disaster project management; and multi hazard risk assessment. The study also identifies a series of recommendations to key actors in the built environment on how to more effectively mainstream disaster resilience in the construction process. The recommendations are set out in five key themes: education, policy, practice, research and cross-cutting. Research limitations/implications This study is part of an EU funded research project that is seeking to develop innovative and timely professional education that will update the knowledge and skills of construction professionals in the industry and enable them to contribute more effectively to disaster resilience building efforts. Originality/value The paper provides an extensive analysis of the gaps in the knowledgebase of construction professionals that are undermining their ability to contribute to the development of a more disaster resilient society. Accordingly, the paper recommends major changes in construction education, research, policy and practice with respect to mainstreaming disaster resilience within the construction process.

[1]  Dilanthi Amaratunga,et al.  An Exploration of the Construction Industry’s Role in Disaster Preparedness, Response and Recovery , 2006 .

[2]  Andrew Price,et al.  Integrating disaster risk management into construction: a UK perspective , 2007 .

[3]  Dilanthi Amaratunga,et al.  An integrative review of the built environment discipline's role in the development of society's resilience to disasters , 2010 .

[4]  Liza Ireni-Saban.  Challenging Disaster Administration , 2013 .

[5]  K. A T H L E E N T I E R N E Y A N D M I C H E L B R.  Conceptualizing and Measuring Resilience a Key to Disaster Loss Reduction , 2022 .

[6]  John T Cacioppo,et al.  Social resilience: the value of social fitness with an application to the military. , 2011, The American psychologist.

[7]  Champika Lasanthi Liyanage.  Construction in a changing world , 2016 .

[8]  Knut H. Alfsen,et al.  Preparing for climate change impacts in Norway's built environment , 2003 .

[9]  Jo da Silva,et al.  Lessons from Aceh: Key Considerations in Post-Disaster Reconstruction , 2010 .

[10]  Tony Lloyd-Jones,et al.  Mind the Gap! Post-disaster reconstruction and the transition from humanitarian relief , 2006 .

[11]  David R. Godschalk,et al.  Urban Hazard Mitigation: Creating Resilient Cities , 2003 .

[12]  Christian Uhr.  Leadership Ideals as Barriers for Efficient Collaboration During Emergencies and Disasters , 2017 .

[13]  Srinath Perera,et al.  Professional doctorates: applicability to theconstruction industry in increasing societalresilience to disasters , 2015 .

[14]  Arturas Kaklauskas,et al.  Reforming HEI to improve skills and knowledge on disaster resilience among construction professionals , 2010 .

[15]  W. Rees.  The ecological crisis and self-delusion: implications for the building sector , 2009 .

[16]  Tom J. Bartuska.  The Built Environment: Definition and Scope , 2007 .

[17]  Richard Haigh,et al.  Mainstreaming disaster resilience in the construction process: Professional education for a resilient built environment , 2017 .

[18]  Richard Haigh,et al.  Knowledge management for disaster resilience: Identification of key success factors , 2010 .

[19]  Chamindi Malalgoda,et al.  A disaster resilient built environment in urban cities , 2015 .

[20]  Richard Lorch.  What lessons must be learned from the tsunami? , 2005 .

[21]  Ah Roberts.  Code of Practice for Project Management for Construction and Development , 2014 .

[22]  Irene Lill,et al.  Mapping Construction Industry Roles to the Disaster Management Cycle , 2014 .

[23]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[24]  Dilanthi Amaratunga,et al.  Capacity gaps in post disaster construction & demolition waste management , 2015 .

[25]  R. Haigh,et al.  Developing Capacities for Disaster Risk Reduction in the Built Environment: Capacity analysis in Sri Lanka , 2010 .

[26]  A. Thieken,et al.  Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction – Success or Warning Sign for Paris? , 2015 .

[27]  Ae Allen.  Sustainable cities or sustainable urbanisation , 2009 .

[28]  Siambabala Bernard Manyena,et al.  The concept of resilience revisited. , 2006, Disasters.

[29]  Lee Bosher,et al.  Disaster risk reduction and 'built-in' resilience: towards overarching principles for construction practice. , 2011, Disasters.

[30]  Feniosky Peña-Mora,et al.  Robust Mobile Ad Hoc Space for Collaboration to Support Disaster Relief Efforts Involving Critical Physical Infrastructure , 2006 .

[31]  M. H. Faber,et al.  Social and technological aspects of disaster resilience , 2016 .

[32]  David Cottrell,et al.  Strategies for Improving Response and Recovery in the Future , 2000 .

[33]  S. Schneider,et al.  A contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernment Panel on Climate Change , 2001 .

[34]  Marianne Davys,et al.  RIBA Plan of Work , 2019, Small Practice and the Sole Practitioner.

[35]  Leadership abilities, skills and knowledge in building , 2015 .

[36]  David Satterthwaite,et al.  The political underpinnings of cities’ accumulated resilience to climate change , 2013 .