Switching of the Relative Dominance Between Feedback Mechanisms in Lipopolysaccharide-Induced NF-κB Signaling

Dueling feedback loops set the threshold for mounting an effective innate immune response to infection. Rewiring NF-κB Signaling The bacterial product lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulates nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) signaling, which results in the production of proinflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor–α (TNF-α), as part of the immune response. NF-κB target genes also include those encoding proteins that inhibit NF-κB signaling through negative feedback loops. By simultaneously studying the dynamics of the nuclear translocation of the NF-κB subunit RelA and the activity of a Tnf-driven reporter in a mouse macrophage cell line, Sung et al. found that the gene encoding RelA was also a target of NF-κB. Synthesis of RelA occurred only at higher concentrations of LPS and constituted a positive feedback loop that dominated over existing negative feedback mechanisms. Genes expressed in response to a high concentration of LPS were enriched for those involved in innate immune responses. Together, these data suggest that the RelA-mediated positive feedback loop enables macrophages to mount an effective immune response only above a critical concentration of LPS. A fundamental goal in biology is to gain a quantitative understanding of how appropriate cell responses are achieved amid conflicting signals that work in parallel. Through live, single-cell imaging, we monitored both the dynamics of nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) signaling and inflammatory cytokine transcription in macrophages exposed to the bacterial product lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Our analysis revealed a previously uncharacterized positive feedback loop involving induction of the expression of Rela, which encodes the RelA (p65) NF-κB subunit. This positive feedback loop rewired the regulatory network when cells were exposed to LPS above a distinct concentration. Paradoxically, this rewiring of NF-κB signaling in macrophages (a myeloid cell type) required the transcription factor Ikaros, which promotes the development of lymphoid cells. Mathematical modeling and experimental validation showed that the RelA positive feedback overcame existing negative feedback loops and enabled cells to discriminate between different concentrations of LPS to mount an effective innate immune response only at higher concentrations. We suggest that this switching in the relative dominance of feedback loops (“feedback dominance switching”) may be a general mechanism in immune cells to integrate opposing feedback on a key transcriptional regulator and to set a response threshold for the host.

[1]  M. Simon,et al.  Suppression of LPS-Induced TNF-α Production in Macrophages by cAMP Is Mediated by PKA-AKAP95-p105 , 2009, Science Signaling.

[2]  D. S. Broomhead,et al.  Pulsatile Stimulation Determines Timing and Specificity of NF-κB-Dependent Transcription , 2009, Science.

[3]  Thomas Höfer,et al.  Multi-layered stochasticity and paracrine signal propagation shape the type-I interferon response , 2012, Molecular systems biology.

[4]  David Baltimore,et al.  IκBβ acts to both inhibit and activate gene expression at different stages of the inflammatory response , 2010, Nature.

[5]  I. M. Neiman,et al.  [Inflammation and cancer]. , 1974, Patologicheskaia fiziologiia i eksperimental'naia terapiia.

[6]  I. Fraser,et al.  The use of RNA interference to analyze protein phosphatase function in mammalian cells. , 2007, Methods in molecular biology.

[7]  A. Sharpe,et al.  Selective defects in the development of the fetal and adult lymphoid system in mice with an Ikaros null mutation. , 1996, Immunity.

[8]  Alexander Hoffmann,et al.  The regulatory logic of the NF-kappaB signaling system. , 2010, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[9]  Ertugrul M. Ozbudak,et al.  Regulation of noise in the expression of a single gene , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[10]  S. Smale Selective Transcription in Response to an Inflammatory Stimulus , 2010, Cell.

[11]  Thomas F Meyer,et al.  High-throughput and single-cell imaging of NF-κB oscillations using monoclonal cell lines , 2010, BMC Cell Biology.

[12]  Steve Gerondakis,et al.  Coordinating TLR‐activated signaling pathways in cells of the immune system , 2007, Immunology and cell biology.

[13]  Timothy K Lee,et al.  Single-cell NF-κB dynamics reveal digital activation and analogue information processing , 2010, Nature.

[14]  Timothy K Lee,et al.  A Noisy Paracrine Signal Determines the Cellular NF-κB Response to Lipopolysaccharide , 2009, Science Signaling.

[15]  S. Kain,et al.  Generation of Destabilized Green Fluorescent Protein as a Transcription Reporter* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[16]  R. Medzhitov Recognition of microorganisms and activation of the immune response , 2007, Nature.

[17]  Kathleen A. Kennedy,et al.  Systems biology approaches identify ATF3 as a negative regulator of Toll-like receptor 4 , 2006, Nature.

[18]  David Baltimore,et al.  IkappaBbeta acts to inhibit and activate gene expression during the inflammatory response. , 2010 .

[19]  James R. Johnson,et al.  Oscillations in NF-κB Signaling Control the Dynamics of Gene Expression , 2004, Science.

[20]  N. Gay,et al.  Activating immunity: lessons from the TLRs and NLRs. , 2009, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[21]  Nir Friedman,et al.  A high-throughput chromatin immunoprecipitation approach reveals principles of dynamic gene regulation in mammals. , 2012, Molecular cell.

[22]  I. Nemenman,et al.  Information Transduction Capacity of Noisy Biochemical Signaling Networks , 2011, Science.

[23]  M. Albert Faculty Opinions recommendation of The IkappaB-NF-kappaB signaling module: temporal control and selective gene activation. , 2002 .

[24]  Govinda Rao,et al.  IRF3 mediates a TLR3/TLR4-specific antiviral gene program. , 2002, Immunity.

[25]  Alistair G. Rust,et al.  Role of the transcription factor C/EBPδ in a regulatory circuit that discriminates between transient and persistent Toll-like receptor 4-induced signals , 2009, Nature Immunology.

[26]  Alexander Hoffmann,et al.  IκBɛ provides negative feedback to control NF-κB oscillations, signaling dynamics, and inflammatory gene expression , 2006, The Journal of cell biology.

[27]  D. Baltimore,et al.  Achieving Stability of Lipopolysaccharide-Induced NF-κB Activation , 2005, Science.

[28]  M. Sung,et al.  Sustained Oscillations of NF-κB Produce Distinct Genome Scanning and Gene Expression Profiles , 2009, PloS one.

[29]  S. Akira,et al.  TRAM couples endocytosis of Toll-like receptor 4 to the induction of interferon-β , 2008, Nature Immunology.

[30]  David A. Rand,et al.  Physiological levels of TNFα stimulation induce stochastic dynamics of NF-κB responses in single living cells , 2010, Journal of Cell Science.

[31]  S. Ng,et al.  Awakening lineage potential by Ikaros-mediated transcriptional priming. , 2010, Current opinion in immunology.

[32]  A. Hoffmann,et al.  Encoding NF- (cid:1) B temporal control in response to TNF: distinct roles for the negative regulators I (cid:1) B (cid:2) and A20 , 2008 .

[33]  David Baltimore,et al.  Encoding NF-kappaB temporal control in response to TNF: distinct roles for the negative regulators IkappaBalpha and A20. , 2008, Genes & development.

[34]  A. Hoffmann,et al.  The I (cid:1) B –NF-(cid:1) B Signaling Module: Temporal Control and Selective Gene Activation , 2022 .

[35]  J. Dixon,et al.  Bcl-6 and NF-kappaB cistromes mediate opposing regulation of the innate immune response. , 2010, Genes & development.

[36]  F. Granucci,et al.  CD14 Controls the LPS-Induced Endocytosis of Toll-like Receptor 4 , 2011, Cell.

[37]  J. Stender,et al.  Mechanisms Establishing TLR4-Responsive Activation States of Inflammatory Response Genes , 2011, PLoS genetics.

[38]  Claire V. Harper,et al.  Population robustness arising from cellular heterogeneity , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  J. Raser,et al.  Noise in Gene Expression: Origins, Consequences, and Control , 2005, Science.

[40]  Nicholas A. Ruggero,et al.  Single-Cell and Population NF-κB Dynamic Responses Depend on Lipopolysaccharide Preparation , 2013, PloS one.