Improving access to primary healthcare for vulnerable populations in Australia and Canada: protocol for a mixed-method evaluation of six complex interventions

Introduction Access to primary healthcare (PHC) has a fundamental influence on health outcomes, particularly for members of vulnerable populations. Innovative Models Promoting Access-to-Care Transformation (IMPACT) is a 5-year research programme built on community-academic partnerships. IMPACT aims to design, implement and evaluate organisational innovations to improve access to appropriate PHC for vulnerable populations. Six Local Innovation Partnerships (LIPs) in three Australian states (New South Wales, Victoria and South Australia) and three Canadian provinces (Ontario, Quebec and Alberta) used a common approach to implement six different interventions. This paper describes the protocol to evaluate the processes, outcomes and scalability of these organisational innovations. Methods and analysis The evaluation will use a convergent mixed-methods design involving longitudinal (pre and post) analysis of the six interventions. Study participants include vulnerable populations, PHC practices, their clinicians and administrative staff, service providers in other health or social service organisations, intervention staff and members of the LIP teams. Data were collected prior to and 3–6 months after the interventions and included interviews with members of the LIPs, organisational process data, document analysis and tools collecting the cost of components of the intervention. Assessment of impacts on individuals and organisations will rely on surveys and semistructured interviews (and, in some settings, direct observation) of participating patients, providers and PHC practices. Ethics and dissemination The IMPACT research programme received initial ethics approval from St Mary’s Hospital (Montreal) SMHC #13–30. The interventions received a range of other ethics approvals across the six jurisdictions. Dissemination of the findings should generate a deeper understanding of the ways in which system-level organisational innovations can improve access to PHC for vulnerable populations and new knowledge concerning improvements in PHC delivery in health service utilisation.

[1]  G. Russell,et al.  Factors associated with successful chronic disease treatment plans for older Australians: Implications for rural and Indigenous Australians. , 2019, The Australian journal of rural health.

[2]  Sabrina T. Wong,et al.  Promoting cross-jurisdictional primary health care research: developing a set of common indicators across 12 community-based primary health care teams in Canada , 2018, Primary Health Care Research & Development.

[3]  G. Russell,et al.  Factors associated with multiple barriers to access to primary care: an international analysis , 2018, International Journal for Equity in Health.

[4]  G. Russell,et al.  Uncovering the wisdom hidden between the lines: the Collaborative Reflexive Deliberative Approach , 2017, Family practice.

[5]  G. Russell,et al.  Barriers to accessing primary health care: comparing Australian experiences internationally. , 2017, Australian journal of primary health.

[6]  Tracy Finch,et al.  Implementation, context and complexity , 2016, Implementation Science.

[7]  P. Pluye,et al.  Organizational interventions improving access to community-based primary health care for vulnerable populations: a scoping review , 2016, International Journal for Equity in Health.

[8]  G. Russell,et al.  Equity of access to primary healthcare for vulnerable populations: the IMPACT international online survey of innovations , 2016, International Journal for Equity in Health.

[9]  Pierre Pluye,et al.  Combining the power of stories and the power of numbers: mixed methods research and mixed studies reviews. , 2014, Annual review of public health.

[10]  J. Wyatt,et al.  Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  Rachel L. Day,et al.  Connecting the dots and merging meaning: using mixed methods to study primary care delivery transformation. , 2013, Health services research.

[12]  Rachelle Buchbinder,et al.  The grounded psychometric development and initial validation of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) , 2013, BMC Public Health.

[13]  Grant Russell,et al.  Patient-centred access to health care: conceptualising access at the interface of health systems and populations , 2013, International Journal for Equity in Health.

[14]  Richard J. K. Taylor,et al.  Preventive evidence into practice (PEP) study: implementation of guidelines to prevent primary vascular disease in general practice protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial , 2013, Implementation Science.

[15]  G. Russell,et al.  Examining organizational change in primary care practices: experiences from using ethnographic methods. , 2012, Family practice.

[16]  J. Levesque,et al.  Emerging organisational models of primary healthcare and unmet needs for care: insights from a population-based survey in Quebec province , 2012, BMC Family Practice.

[17]  M. Harris.  Access to preventive care by immigrant populations , 2012, BMC Medicine.

[18]  A. Ciampi,et al.  Factors predicting patient use of the emergency department: a retrospective cohort study , 2012, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[19]  M. Harris,et al.  Access to primary health care services by community‐based asylum seekers , 2011, The Medical journal of Australia.

[20]  E. Strumpf,et al.  Primary Health Care in Canada: Systems In Motion , 2011, The Milbank quarterly.

[21]  Stephen W. Hwang,et al.  Access to primary health care among homeless adults in Toronto, Canada: results from the Street Health survey , 2011, Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal.

[22]  G. Bonsel,et al.  Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) , 2011, Quality of Life Research.

[23]  Jesse C. Crosson,et al.  Using Learning Teams for Reflective Adaptation (ULTRA): Insights From a Team-Based Change Management Strategy in Primary Care , 2010, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[24]  Michael Quinn Patton,et al.  Developmental Evaluation: Applying Complexity Concepts to Enhance Innovation and Use , 2010 .

[25]  Sabrina T. Wong,et al.  Perceptions of unmet healthcare needs: what do Punjabi and Chinese-speaking immigrants think? A qualitative study , 2010, BMC health services research.

[26]  Christine C Bennett.  A healthier future for all Australians: an overview of the final report of the National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission , 2009, The Medical journal of Australia.

[27]  Peter Bower,et al.  The GP Patient Survey for use in primary care in the National Health Service in the UK – development and psychometric characteristics , 2009, BMC family practice.

[28]  Johnny Saldaña,et al.  The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers , 2009 .

[29]  D. Cohen,et al.  Evaluative Criteria for Qualitative Research in Health Care: Controversies and Recommendations , 2008, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[30]  E. Kristjansson,et al.  A Theory-Based Evaluation Framework for Primary Care: Setting the Stage to Evaluate the “Comparison of Models of Primary Health Care in Ontario” Project , 2008, Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation.

[31]  Marie-Dominique Beaulieu,et al.  Practice Features Associated With Patient-Reported Accessibility, Continuity, and Coordination of Primary Health Care , 2008, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[32]  Anita L Stewart,et al.  Interpersonal processes of care survey: patient-reported measures for diverse groups. , 2007, Health services research.

[33]  G. Kephart,et al.  Equity in health services use and intensity of use in Canada , 2007, BMC Health Services Research.

[34]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research , 2006 .

[35]  T. Greenhalgh,et al.  Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions , 2005, Journal of health services research & policy.

[36]  C. MacNeil.  Evaluator as Steward of Citizen Deliberation , 2002 .

[37]  Leiyu Shi,et al.  Validating the Adult Primary Care Assessment Tool , 2001 .

[38]  M. Stewart,et al.  The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes. , 2000, The Journal of family practice.

[39]  J E Ware,et al.  The Primary Care Assessment Survey: tests of data quality and measurement performance. , 1998, Medical care.

[40]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[41]  Donald R. Miller,et al.  THE VETERANS RAND 12 ITEM HEALTH SURVEY ( VR-12 ) : WHAT IT IS AND HOW IT IS USED , 2007 .

[42]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using multivariate statistics, 5th ed. , 2007 .

[43]  L. Valenti,et al.  Matching care to need in general practice: A secondary analysis of Bettering the Evaluation and Care of Health (BEACH) data , 2004 .

[44]  Yves Béland,et al.  Canadian community health survey--methodological overview. , 2002, Health reports.

[45]  P. Morrison,et al.  Suicide deaths and suicide attempts. , 2002, Health reports.

[46]  P. Burgess,et al.  Assessing perceived need for mental health care in a community survey: development of the Perceived Need for Care Questionnaire (PNCQ) , 2000, Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology.

[47]  A. Lalonde.  Canadian Institute for Health Information. , 1994, Canadian journal of medical technology.

[48]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .