Parallel vs. Sequential Cascading MEP Coordination Strategies: A Pharmaceutical Building Case Study

Abstract We analyze the impact of parallel vs. sequential design coordination strategies on coordination productivity and information sharing. Previous studies have shown how building information modeling (BIM) could improve interorganizational design coordination between architecture, structure, and mechanical, electrical, and plumbing (MEP) components of buildings (MEP coordination, for short) and thus improve the quality and efficiency of a design and construction project in terms of the reduced numbers of errors and requests for information. This paper presents a unique case where two MEP coordinators were hired for a BIM-assisted project, which was a pharmaceutical company headquarters office building in Silver Spring, Maryland. The first coordinator coordinated MEP designs concurrently with other trades, whereas the second coordinator coordinated MEP designs step-by-step in a sequential process. The results of our analysis showed that the two different coordination processes largely affect the number of clashes in the first run of clash detection, coordination meeting time and efficiency, ease in finding root causes of the clashes, and number of coordination cycles to complete the coordination. As such, the sequential coordination strategy was about three times faster than the parallel strategy in terms of coordination productivity. A further examination of these two processes from an information-sharing perspective showed that the sequential coordination process reduces the concentration of information, thus reducing the overload of a coordinator with decision-making tasks, and facilitates information sharing between heterogeneous project participants. The findings of this study have potential as a basis for future development of BIM-based MEP coordination best practices and strategies as well as providing the metrics for understanding, measuring, and predicting the performance of BIM-based MEP coordination and strategically planning the coordination process.

[1]  Charles M. Eastman Cognitive Processes and III-Defined Problems: A Case Study from Design , 1969, IJCAI.

[2]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Divergence or Congruence? A Path Model of Rework for Building and Civil Engineering Projects , 2009 .

[3]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  A Model-Based Framework to Overlap Product Development Activities , 1997 .

[4]  Charles M. Eastman,et al.  BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers and Contractors , 2008 .

[5]  Bon-Gang Hwang,et al.  Performance metric development for pharmaceutical construction projects , 2010 .

[6]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Performance of Coupled Product Development Activities with a Deadline , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[7]  G. Goldschmidt The dialectics of sketching , 1991 .

[8]  Ghang Lee,et al.  D3 City project — Economic impact of BIM-assisted design validation , 2012 .

[9]  J. Daniel Sherman,et al.  Optimal modes and levels of integration, and the identification of cross-functional coordination deficiencies in concurrent engineering , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[10]  G. Chartrand Introductory Graph Theory , 1984 .

[11]  John Scott What is social network analysis , 2010 .

[12]  Martin Fischer,et al.  Benefits and lessons learned of implementing building virtual design and construction (VDC) technologies for coordination of mechanical, electrical, and plumbing (MEP) systems on a large healthcare project , 2008, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[13]  Ghang Lee,et al.  What Information Can or Cannot Be Exchanged? , 2011, J. Comput. Civ. Eng..

[14]  Stuart Watson BIM: the case studies , 2013 .

[15]  Clyde B. Tatum,et al.  Development of a Knowledge-Based System to Improve Mechanical , Electrical , and Plumbing Coordination , 2001 .

[16]  David R. Riley,et al.  Benefit-Cost Metrics for Design Coordination of Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Systems in Multistory Buildings , 2005 .

[17]  Graham K. Rand,et al.  Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences , 1983 .

[18]  Ruth Burris,et al.  A Coordination Structure Approach to the management of Projects , 1995 .

[19]  Kumar Neeraj Jha,et al.  Commitment, coordination, competence and the iron triangle , 2007 .

[20]  Michael J. Shaw,et al.  An intelligent-agent framework for concurrent product design and planning , 1996 .

[21]  C. Prell Social Network Analysis: History, Theory and Methodology , 2011 .

[22]  John Scott Social Network Analysis , 1988 .

[23]  L. Freeman Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[24]  Ghang Lee,et al.  Specifying parametric building object behavior (BOB) for a building information modeling system , 2006 .

[25]  Vineet Padmanabhan,et al.  Comments on "Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect" , 1997, Manag. Sci..

[26]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Structure of Ill Structured Problems , 1973, Artif. Intell..

[27]  Roger Calantone,et al.  Performance and time to market: accelerating cycle time with overlapping stages , 2000, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[28]  J. Fransoo,et al.  Measuring the bullwhip effect in the supply chain , 2000 .

[29]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[30]  J. Alberto Espinosa,et al.  Time Separation, Coordination, and Performance in Technical Teams , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[31]  M. Jung Commitment , 2000, The Mind-Body Problem.

[32]  Ghang Lee,et al.  Avoiding design errors: a case study of redesigning an architectural studio , 2003 .

[33]  Wenhong Luo,et al.  Coordination in Consultant-Assisted IS Projects: An Agency Theory Perspective , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[34]  Martin Fischer,et al.  Knowledge and Reasoning for MEP Coordination , 2003 .

[35]  Carrie Sturts Dossick,et al.  A CASE STUDY OF THE FAILURE OF DIGITAL COMMUNICATION TO CROSS KNOWLEDGE BOUNDARIES IN VIRTUAL CONSTRUCTION , 2010 .

[36]  Mary J. Meixell,et al.  Activity structures in a project-based environment: a coordination theory perspective , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[37]  M. Lambrecht,et al.  Exploring the Bullwhip Effect by Means of Spreadsheet Simulation , 2009 .

[38]  S. Hohmann The Bullwhip Effect in Supply Chains , 2014 .