The relationship between upper limb activity and impairment in post-stroke hemiplegia

Purpose. To investigate the relationship between upper limb impairments and activity limitation. Method. A cross sectional, single assessment observational study in which people with hemiplegia as a result of a stroke underwent a testing procedure in an instrumented wrist rig in which the following measures of impairment were recorded: Spasticity; motor control (ability to track a moving target); muscle activation patterns during tracking; stiffness; range of active movement and isometric muscle strength. Participants also performed clinical tests of upper limb activity (Action Research Arm Test) and hyper-tonicity (Modified Ashworth Scale). Results. Seventeen people with hemiplegia whose mean age was 57 (SD 13.4) took part. Their mean upper limb activity, measured by the Action Research Arm Test, was 19.3 (SD 11.2). Statistically significant positive relationships between level of activity and the negative features of the upper motor neuron syndrome such as motor control r = 0.710 (p = 0.003), active range of movement r = 0.540 (p = 0.025) and strength into flexion r = 0.515 (p = 0.034) and extension r = 0.575 (p = 0.016) were identified, but not with the positive features, such as spasticity or the secondary features such as stiffness. Conclusions. The negative features of the upper motor neuron syndrome appear more likely to affect upper limb activity than the positive or secondary features, but findings need confirming in different study populations, preferably with larger samples.

[1]  Bernie Silver Spatial Neglect: A Clinical Handbook for Diagnosis and Treatment , 2001 .

[2]  F. Walshe Contributions of John Hughlings JACKSON to neurology. A brief introduction to his teachings. , 1961, Archives of neurology.

[3]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Motor system activation after subcortical stroke depends on corticospinal system integrity. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[4]  R L Hewer,et al.  Assessment of recovery of arm control in hemiplegic stroke patients. 1. Arm function tests. , 1980, International rehabilitation medicine.

[5]  H. Hermens,et al.  European recommendations for surface electromyography: Results of the SENIAM Project , 1999 .

[6]  W. T. Thach,et al.  How do strength, sensation, spasticity and joint individuation relate to the reaching deficits of people with chronic hemiparesis? , 2004, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[7]  Lin Fumei,et al.  Correlation of Spasticity With Hyperactive Stretch Reflexes and Motor Dysfunction in Hemiplegia , 1999 .

[8]  I. Perkash,et al.  Functional magnetic stimulation: a new modality for enhancing systemic fibrinolysis. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[9]  T. Platz,et al.  Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer Test, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test: a multicentre study , 2005, Clinical rehabilitation.

[10]  Philip A Wright,et al.  Reliability and Sensitivity of a Wrist Rig to Measure Motor Control and Spasticity in Poststroke Hemiplegia , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[11]  P. van Vliet,et al.  Reliability of measurements obtained with the modified Ashworth scale in the lower extremities of people with stroke. , 2002, Physical therapy.

[12]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. , 1987, Physical therapy.

[13]  N. Ward Neural plasticity and recovery of function. , 2005, Progress in brain research.

[14]  R. Nudo Adaptive plasticity in motor cortex: implications for rehabilitation after brain injury. , 2003, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[15]  A. Thilmann,et al.  Biomechanical changes at the ankle joint after stroke. , 1991, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[16]  R. Nudo,et al.  Neural Substrates for the Effects of Rehabilitative Training on Motor Recovery After Ischemic Infarct , 1996, Science.

[17]  L. Ada,et al.  Relation between spasticity, weakness and contracture of the elbow flexors and upper limb activity after stroke: An observational study , 2006, Disability and rehabilitation.

[18]  H Rodgers,et al.  A review of the properties and limitations of the Ashworth and modified Ashworth Scales as measures of spasticity , 1999, Clinical rehabilitation.

[19]  J. Burridge,et al.  Analysis of the quality of wrist movement during a simple tracking task , 2007, Physiological measurement.

[20]  M. Barnes Upper Motor Neurone Syndrome and Spasticity: An overview of the clinical management of spasticity , 2008 .

[21]  J H Burridge,et al.  Relation between abnormal patterns of muscle activation and response to common peroneal nerve stimulation in hemiplegia , 2000, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[22]  P. A. Lynn,et al.  Assessment of recovery of arm control in hemiplegic stroke patients. 2. Comparison of arm function tests and pursuit tracking in relation to clinical recovery. , 1980, International rehabilitation medicine.

[23]  J. Chae,et al.  Muscle Weakness and Cocontraction in Upper Limb Hemiparesis: Relationship to Motor Impairment and Physical Disability , 2002, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[24]  M. Sabbahi,et al.  Correlation of spasticity with hyperactive stretch reflexes and motor dysfunction in hemiplegia. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[25]  DE Wood,et al.  Theoretical and methodological considerations in the measurement of spasticity , 2005, Disability and rehabilitation.

[26]  S. Sahrmann,et al.  Relationships between Sensorimotor Impairments and Reaching Deficits in Acute Hemiparesis , 2006, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[27]  J. H. van der Lee,et al.  The responsiveness of the Action Research Arm test and the Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale in chronic stroke patients. , 2001, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[28]  Maarten J. IJzerman,et al.  Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[29]  P. Halligan,et al.  New wine in old bottles: the WHO ICF as an explanatory model of human behaviour , 2003, Clinical rehabilitation.

[30]  R. Macdonell,et al.  Upper Motor Neurone Syndrome and Spasticity: Clinical Management and Neurophysiology , 2001 .