Altruistic, egoistic and biospheric values in willingness to pay (WTP) for wildlife

Abstract We attempt to measure general attitudes and ethical beliefs towards preservation, as well as the importance of each of the three considered value orientations (biospheric, egoistic and altruistic) in WTP estimates. In the present study, we apply the GAC scale to a contingent valuation exercise for the recovery of the common murre (Uria aalge) in Galicia (Spain). Up to now, only a few studies in the field of environmental and ecological economics have analyzed value orientations under the Environmental Concern (EC) framework, obtaining mixed results. In the present work, we conclude that ethical aspects affect the individuals decision making process, and that value orientations play an important role in the pro-environmental attitude formation. These value orientations affect willingness to pay (WTP) estimates for environmental goods.

[1]  J. Quiggin,et al.  Respondents To Contingent Valuation Surveys: Consumers Or Citizens? - Reply , 1995 .

[2]  Clive L. Spash,et al.  Ecosystems, contingent valuation and ethics: the case of wetland re-creation , 2000 .

[3]  Clive L. Spash,et al.  Ethics and environmental attitudes with implications for economic valuation , 1997 .

[4]  P. Stern,et al.  The New Ecological Paradigm in Social-Psychological Context , 1995 .

[5]  O. Johansson-Stenman,et al.  The Importance of Ethics in Environmental Economics with a Focus on Existence Values , 1998 .

[6]  Michael A. Tarrant,et al.  The Effect of Respondent Characteristics on General Environmental Attitude-Behavior Correspondence , 1997 .

[7]  Eija Pouta,et al.  Attitude and belief questions as a source of context effect in a contingent valuation survey , 2004 .

[8]  David A. Lishner,et al.  Altruism and helping behavior , 2003 .

[9]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[10]  Brett R. Gelso,et al.  The influence of ethical attitudes on the demand for environmental recreation: incorporating lexicographic preferences , 2005 .

[11]  E. Pouta.  Attitude-Behavior Framework in Contingent Valuation of Forest Conservation , 2003 .

[12]  Gregory L. Poe,et al.  The structure of motivation for contingent values: a case study of lake water quality improvement , 2004 .

[13]  Mark Sagoff,et al.  Should Preferences Count , 1994 .

[14]  Robert Cameron Mitchell,et al.  Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method , 1989 .

[15]  N. Hanley,et al.  Preferences, information and biodiversity preservation , 1995 .

[16]  Ramón Martí,et al.  Atlas de las aves reproductoras de España , 2004 .

[17]  Ronald J. Glass,et al.  MEASURING THE EXISTENCE VALUE OF WILDLIFE - WHAT DO CVM ESTIMATES REALLY SHOW , 1991 .

[18]  Matthew J. Kotchen,et al.  Random effects analysis , 2003 .

[19]  R. Dunlap,et al.  The “New Environmental Paradigm” , 1978 .

[20]  P. Stern,et al.  The Value Basis of Environmental Concern , 1994 .

[21]  E. Jane Luzar,et al.  Willingness to pay or intention to pay: The attitude-behavior relationship in contingent valuation , 1998 .

[22]  R. Dunlap,et al.  THE NEW ENVIRONMENTAL PARADIGM: 5 PROPOSED MEASURING INSTRUMENT AND PRELIMINARY RESULTS , 1978 .

[23]  P. Stern,et al.  Value Orientations, Gender, and Environmental Concern , 1993 .

[24]  C. Spash.  Non-Economic Motivation for Contingent Values: Rights and Attitudinal Beliefs in the Willingness To Pay for Environmental Improvements , 2006, Land Economics.

[25]  Clive L. Spash,et al.  Informing and forming preferences in environmental valuation: Coral reef biodiversity , 2002 .

[26]  Eija Pouta, Mika Rekola.  The Theory of Planned Behavior in Predicting Willingness to Pay for Abatement of Forest Regeneration , 2001 .

[27]  T. Brown,et al.  Measuring dispositions for lexicographic preferences of environmental goods: integrating economics, psychology and ethics , 2003 .