USING DISCRETE LASER PULSE RETURN INTENSITY TO MODEL CANOPY TRANSMITTANCE

Five comparable airborne lidar datasets were collected over a mixed wood site on five separate occasions throughout a single growing season to capture changing canopy transmittance conditions. Using the small footprint discrete pulse intensity return data, the vertical pulse power distribution was reconstructed for 30 plots each containing 5 digital hemispherical photo (DHP) stations. Canopy gap fraction was calculated for the 150 DHP images collected coincident with the lidar data and used as validation for overhead canopy transmittance. By modifying a Beer-Lambert approach, we relate the ratio of lidar intensity-based ground return power / total return power to the canopy gap fraction. The results are compared to the commonly cited and utilised ground-tototal returns ratio. It is found that for the mixed wood environment studied, a lidar intensity-based power distribution ratio provides a slightly higher coefficient of determination with DHP gap fraction (r 2 = 0.92) than does the often used ground-to-total return ratio approach (r 2 = 0.86). Moreover, if the intensity power distribution ratio is modified to account for two-way pulse transmission losses within the canopy, the model requires no calibration and provides a 1:1 estimate of the overhead (solar zenith) gap fraction. The premise of the study is that the interaction between forest canopy and laser pulses emitted from an airborne lidar (light detection and ranging) mapping system can be considered in some ways analogous to the interaction of direct beam solar radiation with canopy covered environments. We examine the reconstructed vertical pulse power distribution returned from a commercial small footprint discrete pulse airborne laser scanning system and relate properties of the distribution to canopy structural and radiative transfer characteristics. In particular, we compare published gap fraction (P) algorithms to new algorithms that utilize the return intensity information. From the algorithms tested we develop a non-parameterized quasi-physical model of the spatiotemporal variation in canopy gap fraction for a mixed forest landscape. For the purpose of this analysis we make the assumption that overhead gap fraction (P) and overhead transmittance (T) are equivalent.

[1]  Chris Hopkinson,et al.  The influence of flying altitude and beam divergence on canopy penetration and laser pulse return distribution characteristics , 2007 .

[2]  Peter M. Atkinson,et al.  Three-dimensional mapping of light transmittance and foliage distribution using lidar , 2003 .

[3]  Erik Næsset,et al.  Mapping defoliation during a severe insect attack on Scots pine using airborne laser scanning , 2006 .

[4]  P. Treitz,et al.  Mapping stand-level forest biophysical variables for a mixedwood boreal forest using lidar: an examination of scanning density , 2006 .

[5]  P. G. Jarvis,et al.  Productivity of temperate de-ciduous and evergreen forests , 1983 .

[6]  Oliver Sonnentag,et al.  Leaf area index measurements at Fluxnet-Canada forest sites , 2006 .

[7]  John W. Pomeroy,et al.  WINTER RADIATION EXTINCTION AND REFLECTION IN A BOREAL PINE CANOPY: MEASUREMENTS AND MODELLING , 1996 .

[8]  K. Itten,et al.  Estimation of LAI and fractional cover from small footprint airborne laser scanning data based on gap fraction , 2006 .

[9]  Laura Chasmer,et al.  Towards a universal lidar canopy height indicator , 2006 .

[10]  S. Magnussen,et al.  Derivations of stand heights from airborne laser scanner data with canopy-based quantile estimators , 1998 .

[11]  Sylvain G. Leblanc,et al.  Methodology comparison for canopy structure parameters extraction from digital hemispherical photography in boreal forests , 2005 .

[12]  J. Chen Optically-based methods for measuring seasonal variation of leaf area index in boreal conifer stands , 1996 .

[13]  R. E. Munn 17 – Forest Meteorology , 1966 .

[14]  Emilio Chuvieco,et al.  Estimation of leaf area index and covered ground from airborne laser scanner (Lidar) in two contrasting forests , 2004 .

[15]  O. Lange Ecosystem processes : mineral cycling, productivity and man's influence , 1983 .

[16]  C. Osmond,et al.  Physiological Plant Ecology I , 1981, Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology.

[17]  H. Tsuzuki,et al.  Extensive Forest Leaf Area Survey Aiming at Detection of Vegetation Change in Subarctic-Boreal Zone , 2000 .

[18]  W. Cohen,et al.  Lidar Remote Sensing of the Canopy Structure and Biophysical Properties of Douglas-Fir Western Hemlock Forests , 1999 .

[19]  David J. Harding,et al.  Light transmittance in forest canopies determined using airborne laser altimetry and in-canopy quantum measurements , 2001 .

[20]  S. Ustin,et al.  Estimation of tree canopy leaf area index by gap fraction analysis , 1993 .

[21]  S. T. Gower,et al.  Direct and Indirect Estimation of Leaf Area Index, fAPAR, and Net Primary Production of Terrestrial Ecosystems , 1999 .