Control mapping in virtual reality: effects on spatial presence and controller naturalness

This study explores how a video game player’s sense of being in a game world (i.e., spatial presence) is impacted by the use of a virtual reality head-mounted display (VR HMD). Research focused on VR (as realized with the use of HMDs) has fallen by the wayside since the early 1990s due to the limitations in the technology. With modern reimagining of VR HMDs, there is now an opportunity to reexamine the impact it has on gaming experience. This article explores the results of an experiment in which university students played video games using either a VR HMD or a standard monitor while playing a first-person shooter video game. Control interface was also manipulated between incomplete tangible mapped devices (Razer Hydra) and directionally mapped devices (mouse and keyboard). Results indicated that VR HMDs have a positive impact on a players’ level of spatial presence and feelings of controller naturalness. Controller naturalness also impacted spatial presence regardless of display condition.

[1]  S. Shyam Sundar,et al.  Can Interface Features Affect Aggression Resulting from Violent Video Game Play? An Examination of Realistic Controller and Large Screen Size , 2013, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[2]  Corey P. Carbonara,et al.  Controller Required? The Impact of Natural Mapping on Interactivity, Realism, Presence, and Enjoyment in Motion-Based Video Games , 2014, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[3]  Kenneth A. Lachlan,et al.  Liberating American Communications: Foreign Ownership Regulations from the Radio Act of 1912 to the Radio Act of 1927 , 2004 .

[4]  Grigore C. Burdea,et al.  Virtual reality technology (2. ed.) , 2003 .

[5]  Corey P. Carbonara,et al.  Spatial Presence and Perceived Reality as Predictors of Motion-Based Video Game Enjoyment , 2011, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[6]  Paul Skalski,et al.  Image versus Sound: A Comparison of Formal Feature Effects on Presence and Video Game Enjoyment , 2010, PsychNology J..

[7]  Maria del Carmen Juan Lizandra,et al.  Comparison of the Levels of Presence and Anxiety in an Acrophobic Environment Viewed via HMD or CAVE , 2009, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[8]  Wijnand A. IJsselsteijn,et al.  Effects of Stereoscopic Presentation, Image Motion, and Screen Size on Subjective and Objective Corroborative Measures of Presence , 2001, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[9]  Colin Potts,et al.  Design of Everyday Things , 1988 .

[10]  Keith Duncan,et al.  Cognitive Engineering , 2017, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[11]  Wei Peng,et al.  Effects of screen size, viewing angle, and players' immersion tendencies on game experience , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[12]  Jonathan Freeman,et al.  A Cross-Media Presence Questionnaire: The ITC-Sense of Presence Inventory , 2001, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[13]  P. Vorderer,et al.  Enjoyment: At the Heart of Media Entertainment , 2004 .

[14]  Anthony M. Limperos,et al.  Gaming Across Different Consoles: Exploring the Influence of Control Scheme on Game-Player Enjoyment , 2011, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[15]  C. Bracken,et al.  Immersed in media : telepresence in everyday life , 2010 .

[16]  Jonathan Steuer,et al.  Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence , 1992 .

[17]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Cognitive Engineering In Norman , 1986 .

[18]  Christoph Klimmt,et al.  Effectance and Control as Determinants of Video Game Enjoyment , 2007, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[19]  Mel Slater,et al.  Immersion, presence and performance in virtual environments: an experiment with tri-dimensional chess , 1996, VRST.

[20]  Mary C. Whitton,et al.  Walking > walking-in-place > flying, in virtual environments , 1999, SIGGRAPH.

[21]  Mel Slater,et al.  Taking steps: the influence of a walking technique on presence in virtual reality , 1995, TCHI.

[22]  Paul Skalski,et al.  Mapping the road to fun: Natural video game controllers, presence, and game enjoyment , 2011, New Media Soc..

[23]  Kay M. Stanney,et al.  Locus of User-Initiated Control in Virtual Environments: Influences on Cybersickness , 1998, Presence.

[24]  Avi Parush,et al.  Cybersickness induced by desktop virtual reality , 2012, Graphics Interface.

[25]  Kay M. Stanney,et al.  Duration and Exposure to Virtual Environments: Sickness Curves During and Across Sessions , 2000, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[26]  Christoph Klimmt,et al.  A Process Model of the Formation of Spatial Presence Experiences , 2007 .

[27]  Joseph J. LaViola,et al.  A discussion of cybersickness in virtual environments , 2000, SGCH.

[28]  Doug A. Bowman,et al.  An Evaluation of the Effects of Hyper-Natural Components of Interaction Fidelity on Locomotion Performance in Virtual Reality , 2015, ICAT-EGVE.

[29]  Philippe Coiffet,et al.  Virtual Reality Technology , 2003, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[30]  P. Vorderer.  Interactive entertainment and beyond , 2000 .

[31]  Doug A. Bowman,et al.  Evaluating Display Fidelity and Interaction Fidelity in a Virtual Reality Game , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[32]  Martijn J. Schuemie,et al.  Research on Presence in Virtual Reality: A Survey , 2001, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[33]  Rosa María Baños,et al.  Immersion and Emotion: Their Impact on the Sense of Presence , 2004, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..