The impact of research and technology organizations on firm competitiveness. Measurement and determinants

The objective of this work is to evaluate the impact of research and technology organizations (RTO) on firm competitiveness. To this end, we develop a framework that includes strategies to deal with the methodological problems highlighted in the literature. The main features of this framework are the definition and classification of different types of impacts, the estimation of (rough) quantitative measures of them and the development of a multivariate model to explain the different impacts including the traditional indicators of firm characteristics and their relationships. The empirical work is based on a database constructed from information from the responses to a questionnaire designed specifically to estimate the impact of RTOs on Spanish firms, and information from the Spanish Innovation Survey. Our findings show that firms are able to recognize the influence of these relationships on different technical, economic, investment and intangible impacts and to roughly estimate their economic impact, and that several characteristics of these relationships affect the impact of RTOs.

[1]  A. Barge-Gil,et al.  Complementarities Between Universities and Technology Institutes: New Empirical Lessons and Perspectives , 2011 .

[2]  Elena Huergo,et al.  The role of technological management as a source of innovation: Evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[3]  Hiroyuki Okamuro.  Determinants of successful R&D cooperation in Japanese small businesses: The impact of organizational and contractual characteristics , 2007 .

[4]  Hiro Izushi.  Impact of the length of relationships upon the use of research institutes by SMEs , 2003 .

[5]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[6]  Stephen Martin,et al.  The Evaluation of Strategic Research Partnerships , 2003, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[7]  Jan Youtie,et al.  Current practices in the evaluation of US industrial modernization programs , 1996 .

[8]  Erik Arnold,et al.  Evaluating research and innovation policy: a systems world needs systems evaluations , 2004 .

[9]  Ray Oakey,et al.  New Technology-Based Firms in the 1990s , 2007 .

[10]  A. Salter,et al.  Searching high and low: what types of firms use universities as a source of innovation? , 2004 .

[11]  Hiro Izushi.  Creation of relational assets through the ‘library of equipment’ model: an industrial modernization approach of Japan's local technology centres , 2005 .

[12]  Jan Youtie,et al.  Using an evaluability assessment to select methods for evaluating state technology development programs: the case of the Georgia Research Alliance , 1999 .

[13]  M. Perkmann,et al.  University Industry Relationships and Open Innovation: Towards a Research Agenda , 2007 .

[14]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  External Sources of Knowledge, Governance Mode, and R&D Performance , 2005 .

[15]  A. James,et al.  The sourcing of technological knowledge: Distributed innovation processes and dynamic change , 2003 .

[16]  Alasdair Reid,et al.  Tackling the paradox: can attaining global research excellence be compatible with local technology development? , 2004 .

[17]  Brigitte Preissl,et al.  Research and technology organizations in the service economy , 2006 .

[18]  Linda Berry,et al.  Guidelines for successfully transferring government-sponsored innovations☆ , 1991 .

[19]  R. Narula,et al.  Innovating through strategic alliances: moving towards international partnerships and contractual agreements , 1999 .

[20]  Wolfgang Becker,et al.  R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms—evidence for the German manufacturing industry , 2004 .

[21]  René J. Jorna,et al.  Enhancing the innovative capacity of small firms through triple helix interactions: challenges and opportunities , 2008, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[22]  R. Narula.  R&D Collaboration by SMEs: new opportunities and limitations in the face of globalisation , 2004 .

[23]  Alan MacPherson,et al.  The Role of Contact Requirements in Producer Services Location , 2000 .

[24]  Andrés Barge-Gil,et al.  Developing indicators to measure technology institutes' performance , 2005 .

[25]  Terttu Luukkonen,et al.  Additionality of EU framework programmes , 2000 .

[26]  C. Gallouj.  Asymmetry of information and the service relationship: selection and evaluation of the service provider , 1997 .

[27]  Mariko Sakakibara,et al.  HETEROGENEITY OF FIRM CAPABILITIES AND COOPERATIVE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT: AN EMPIRICAL EXAMINATION OF MOTIVES , 1997 .

[28]  Robin Gustafsson,et al.  First- and second-order additionality and learning outcomes in collaborative R&D programs , 2008 .

[29]  Melvin M. Mark,et al.  Issues and perspectives on evaluating manufacturing modernization programs , 1996 .

[30]  J. Hagedoorn.  Inter-firm R&D partnerships: an overview of major trends and patterns since 1960 , 2002 .

[31]  Jerald Hage,et al.  Industry-Public Knowledge Infrastructure Interaction: Intra- and Inter-organizational Explanations of Interactive Learning , 2004 .

[32]  Balaji R. Koka,et al.  The Reification of Absorptive Capacity: A Critical Review and Rejuvenation of the Construct , 2006 .

[33]  P. O'farrell,et al.  Business Services and their Impact upon Client Performance: An Exploratory Interregional Analysis , 1995 .

[34]  Alessandro Muscio,et al.  THE IMPACT OF ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY ON SMEs' COLLABORATION , 2007 .

[35]  Bernard Guilhon,et al.  Markets for knowledge: problems, scope, and economic implications , 2004 .

[36]  Jan Youtie,et al.  Evaluating industrial modernization: Methods, results, and insights from the Georgia Manufacturing Extension Alliance , 1998 .

[37]  M. Mol,et al.  Does Being R&D Intensive Still Discourage Outsourcing? Evidence from Dutch Manufacturing , 2005 .

[38]  Réjean Landry,et al.  Sources of information as determinants of novelty of innovation in manufacturing firms: evidence from the 1999 statistics Canada innovation survey , 2005 .

[39]  B. Cozzarin.  Data and the measurement of R&D program impacts. , 2008, Evaluation and program planning.

[40]  P. N. O'Farrell,et al.  An Interaction Model of Business Service Production and Consumption , 1991 .

[41]  Marian Beise,et al.  Public research and industrial innovations in Germany , 1999 .

[42]  Robert Hassink,et al.  Technology transfer infrastructures: Some lessons from experiences in Europe, the US and Japan , 1997 .

[43]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Evaluating performance of public–private research collaborations: A DEA analysis , 2003, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[44]  R. Veugelers.  Collaboration in R&D: An Assessment of Theoretical and Empirical Findings , 1998 .

[45]  M. Carree,et al.  Heterogeneity in R&D cooperation strategies , 2004 .

[46]  Salvatore Torrisi,et al.  Markets for technology , 2001 .

[47]  C. Carrincazeaux,et al.  Proximity and localisation of corporate R&D activities , 2001 .

[48]  Teresa García-Marco,et al.  Firms' motivations for cooperative R&D: an empirical analysis of Spanish firms , 2001 .

[49]  Josef Johannes Heijs.  Efectividad de las políticas de innovación en el fomento de la cooperación , 2002 .

[50]  A. López,et al.  Determinants of R&D cooperation: Evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms , 2008 .

[51]  G. Calabrese,et al.  Traditional SMEs and innovation: the role of the industrial policy in Italy , 2001 .

[52]  Michael S. Dahl,et al.  Knowledge flows through informal contacts in industrial clusters: myth or reality? , 2004 .

[53]  R. Veugelers,et al.  R&D Cooperation and Spillovers: Some Empirical Evidence , 1998 .

[54]  Doris Schartinger,et al.  Universities as Agents in Regional Innovation Systems. Evaluating Patterns of Knowledge-Intensive Collaboration in Austria , 2002 .

[55]  Pablo D'Este,et al.  University-industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? , 2007 .

[56]  A. Geuna,et al.  Factors affecting university-industry R&D projects: The importance of searching, screening and signalling , 2006 .

[57]  Roberta Rabellotti,et al.  Business Development Service centres in Italy: close to firms, far from innovation , 2007 .

[58]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  The Emergence of the Knowledge Economy , 2002 .

[59]  A. Arora,et al.  Markets for Technology: The Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy , 2004 .

[60]  Fr¬¥ed¬¥erique Sachwald,et al.  Co-operative R&D: why and with whom?: An integrated framework of analysis , 2003 .

[61]  Robert J. Bennett,et al.  Intensity of interaction in supply of business advice and client impact: a comparison of consultancy, business associations and government support initiatives for SMEs , 1999 .

[62]  A. Macpherson,et al.  The Role of Producer Service Outsourcing in the Innovation Performance of New York State Manufacturing Firms , 1997 .

[63]  Eliezer Geisler,et al.  Explaining the Generation and Performance of Intersector Technology Cooperation: A Survey of the Literature , 2001, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[64]  Anthony Arundel,et al.  Proximity and the use of public science by innovative European firms , 2004 .

[65]  David S. Saal,et al.  Differential Gains from Business Link Support and Advice: A Treatment Effects Approach , 2008 .

[66]  Rajneesh Narula,et al.  Choosing Between Internal and Non-internal R&D Activities: Some Technological and Economic Factors , 2001, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[67]  J. Roessner.  Outcome measurement in the USA: state of the art , 2002 .

[68]  Robert Hassink,et al.  Localized industrial learning and innovation policies , 1997 .

[69]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory , 2000 .

[70]  D. Hitchens,et al.  Research Policy and Review 32. Producer Services and Regional Development: A Review of Some Major Conceptual Policy and Research Issues , 1990 .

[71]  Andrés Barge-Gil,et al.  Are Technology Institutes a Satisfactory Tool for Public Intervention in the Area of Technology? A Neoclassical and Evolutionary Evaluation , 2008 .

[72]  Colin Wren,et al.  Evaluating the Effect of Soft Business Support upon Small Firm Performance , 2002 .

[73]  Peter R H Wood,et al.  Knowledge-intensive Services and Urban Innovativeness , 2002 .

[74]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Building Programme Evaluation into the Design of Public Research‐Support Programmes , 2002 .

[75]  Andrés Barge-Gil,et al.  Cooperation-based innovators and peripheral cooperators: An empirical analysis of their characteristics and behavior , 2010 .

[76]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Improving the effectiveness of public-private R&D collaboration: case studies at a US weapons laboratory , 1998 .

[77]  Johan Lambrecht,et al.  An evaluation of public support measures for private external consultancies to SMEs in the Walloon Region of Belgium , 2005 .

[78]  Douglas R. Williams,et al.  Measuring the economic benefits of research and development: The current state of the art , 1998 .

[79]  Hengyun Ma,et al.  A Survey of the Literature , 2012 .

[80]  Mark Dodgson,et al.  External Linkages and Innovation in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises , 1991 .

[81]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Using Cooperative Research and Development Agreements as S&T Indicators: What do We Have and What Would We Like? , 2003, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..