Geosynchronous magnetopause crossings: necessary conditions

The experimental data on GOES magnetic measurements and plasma measurements on LANL geosynchronous satellites is used for selection of 169 case events containing 638 geosynchronous magnetopause crossings (GMCs) in 1995 to 2001. We study the necessary conditions for the geosynchronous magnetopause crossings using scatter plot of the GMCs in the coordinate space of Psw versus Bz. In such representation the upstream solar wind conditions demonstrate sharp envelope boundary under which no GMCs are occurred. The boundary has two strait horizontal branches where Bz does not influence on the magnetopause location. The first branch is located in the range of Psw=21 nPa for large positive Bz and is associated with an asymptotic regime of the pressure balance. The second branch asymptotically approaches to the range of Psw=4.8 nPa under very strong negative Bz and it is associated with a regime of the Bz influence saturation. We suggest that the saturation is caused by relatively high contribution of the magnetosphere thermal pressure into the pressure balance on the magnetopause. The intermediate region of the boundary for the moderate negative and small positive IMF Bz can be well approximated by a hyperbolic tangent function. We interpret the envelope boundary as a range of necessary upstream solar wind conditions required for GMC in the point on the magnetopause located mostly close to the Earth ("perigee" point). We obtain that the dipole tilt angle and dawn-dusk asymmetry influence on the "perigee" point location. We find that the aGSM latitude of this point depends linearly on the dipole tilt angle with the slope about -0.5. The aGSM longitude of the "perigee" point decreases with IMF Bz with a rate of about 2 angular minutes per 1 nT. An empirical model predicting the magnetopause crossing of the geosynchronous orbit in the "perigee" point is proposed.

[1]  C. Russell,et al.  Near-Earth magnetotail shape and size as determined from the magnetopause flaring angle , 1996 .

[2]  Natasha Balac,et al.  Data mining in space physics: MineTool algorithm , 2007 .

[3]  C. Rufenach,et al.  A study of geosynchronous magnetopause crossings , 1989 .

[4]  A. Dmitriev,et al.  Dayside magnetopause models , 1999 .

[5]  A. Dmitriev,et al.  Possible Sources of the Difference Between a Model Prediction and Observations of Bow Shock Crossings , 2002 .

[6]  L. Přech,et al.  Plasma flow variations and energetic protons upstream of the Earth s bow shock: A statistical study , 2005 .

[7]  Hideaki Kawano,et al.  Magnetopause location under extreme solar wind conditions , 1998 .

[8]  A. Dmitriev,et al.  Saturation of IMF Bz influence on the position of dayside magnetopause , 2003 .

[9]  D. Hamilton,et al.  Radial profiles of quiet time magnetospheric parameters , 1992 .

[10]  C. Russell,et al.  Polar observations and model predictions during May 4, 1998, magnetopause, magnetosheath, and bow shock crossings , 2001 .

[11]  A. Dmitriev,et al.  Comparative study of bow shock models using Wind and Geotail observations , 2003 .

[12]  G. Wrenn,et al.  Geos-2 magnetopause encounters: Low energy (<500 eV) particle measurements , 1981 .

[13]  Louis A. Frank,et al.  On the extraterrestrial ring current during geomagnetic storms , 1967 .

[14]  M. Schield.  Pressure balance between solar wind and magnetosphere , 1969 .

[15]  A predictive model of geosynchronous magnetopause crossings , 2011, 1305.6707.

[16]  C. Russell,et al.  Comparison of three magnetopause prediction models under extreme solar wind conditions , 2001 .

[17]  B. Barraclough,et al.  Magnetospheric plasma analyzer: Initial three‐spacecraft observations from geosynchronous orbit , 1993 .

[18]  J. Slavin,et al.  Magnetic flux transfer associated with expansions and contractions of the dayside magnetosphere , 1978 .

[19]  C. Meng,et al.  Magnetopause from pressure balance , 1999 .

[20]  A. Summers,et al.  Hydromagnetic flow around the magnetosphere , 1966 .

[21]  A. Dmitriev,et al.  Dawn‐dusk asymmetry of geosynchronous magnetopause crossings , 2004 .

[22]  A. Suvorova,et al.  SOLAR WIND CONTROL OF THE MAGNETOPAUSE SHAPE AND LOCATION , 1996 .

[23]  Christopher T. Russell,et al.  A new functional form to study the solar wind control of the magnetopause size and shape , 1997 .

[24]  J. Richardson,et al.  A multifactor analysis of parameters controlling solar wind ion flux correlations using an artificial neural network technique , 2002 .

[25]  S. A. Boardsen,et al.  An empirical model of the high‐latitude magnetopause , 2000 .

[26]  S. Krimigis,et al.  Evolution of the ring current during two geomagnetic storms , 1987 .

[27]  J. Richardson,et al.  A comparison of IMP 8 observed bow shock positions with model predictions , 2003 .

[28]  C. Clauer,et al.  A model of region 1 field‐aligned currents dependent on ionospheric conductivity and solar wind parameters , 2000 .

[29]  Christopher T. Russell,et al.  Shape of the low-latitude magnetopause: Comparison of models , 2000 .

[30]  C. Russell,et al.  An empirical relationship between interplanetary conditions and Dst , 1975 .

[31]  William J. Burke,et al.  Variable time delays in the propagation of the interplanetary magnetic field , 2002 .

[32]  Three‐dimensional artificial neural network model of the dayside magnetopause , 2000, 1302.1704.

[33]  James A. Slavin,et al.  Timing accuracy for the simple planar propagation of magnetic field structures in the solar wind , 1998 .