Pellet fuelled enhanced confinement ICRH discharges in TFTR

Discharges with strongly peaked density profiles, density peaking factor >4, have been produced on the Tokamak Fusion Test Reactor (TFTR) tokamak by deuterium pellet injection. Following the pellet perturbation, these plasmas have been heated using 3He or hydrogen minority ion cyclotron resonance heating (ICRH) at power levels up to 6 MW. As seen in experiments on other devices, a strong transient enhancement of the central plasma parameters, in particular of the fusion reactivity and central electron pressure, has been observed in these discharges. The transport characteristics of these plasmas during the period of enhanced core confinement have been analysed using the TRANSP time dependent interpretive code. The time evolution of the q profile is calculated and compared with measurements. The influence of plasma current and heating power is examined. The local effective thermal and electron particle diffusivities are inferred and compared with those from similar non-enhanced discharges produced by shallow pellet fuelling. The core diffusivities during the enhanced phase are found to be more than a factor of 2 lower than those in the non-peaked discharges, with improvement localized within the plasma core. Enhancement in global confinement is generally modest but operation at low edge q appears to increase the volume of the enhanced region and the magnitude of global confinement. The enhanced phase is terminated by a magnetohydromagnetic (MHD) mode localized off-axis. Operation at higher central q by earlier injection of the pellet and higher current delays the onset of MHD and extends the duration of the enhanced phase. Operation at low q increases the radial extent of the core region

[1]  Lao,et al.  Enhanced confinement and stability in DIII-D discharges with reversed magnetic shear. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[2]  F. Levinton,et al.  Confinement and the safety factor profile , 1995 .

[3]  Manickam,et al.  Improved confinement with reversed magnetic shear in TFTR. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[4]  William Dorland,et al.  Quantitative predictions of tokamak energy confinement from first‐principles simulations with kinetic effects , 1995 .

[5]  R. König,et al.  SPECIAL TOPIC: Survey of pellet enhanced performance in JET discharges , 1995 .

[6]  R. Budny,et al.  A STANDARD DT SUPERSHOT SIMULATION , 1994 .

[7]  Steven H. Batha,et al.  EQUILIBRIUM RECONSTRUCTION OF THE SAFETY FACTOR PROFILE IN TOKAMAKS FROM MOTIONAL STARK EFFECT DATA , 1994 .

[8]  E. Joffrin,et al.  Improved confinement in high li lower hybrid driven steady state plasmas in TORE SUPRA , 1994 .

[9]  Evidence for a local diffusive model of transport in a tokamak , 1992 .

[10]  W. Houlberg,et al.  Pellet fuelling deposition measurements on Jet and TFTR , 1992 .

[11]  F. M. Levinton,et al.  The multichannel motional Stark effect diagnostic on TFTR , 1992 .

[12]  P. W. Fisher,et al.  Tritium pellet injector for TFTR , 1992 .

[13]  D.F.H. Start,et al.  Shear Reversal and Mhd Activity During Pellet Enhanced Performance Pulses in Jet , 1992 .

[14]  A. W. Edwards,et al.  Theoretical analysis of the role of the infernal mode in the stability of peaked pressure profiles in pellet fuelled JET discharges , 1991 .

[15]  A. T. Ramsey,et al.  Experiments utilizing ion cyclotron range of frequencies heating on the TFTR tokamak , 1991 .

[16]  J. Jacquinot,et al.  H-mode confinement in JET with enhanced performance by pellet peaked density profiles , 1991 .

[17]  R. Yoshino,et al.  EFFECT OF THE q = 1 SURFACE AND SAWTOOTH ACTIVITY ON PRESSURE PROFILES AND ENERGY CONFINEMENT IN PELLET FUELLED JT-60 LIMITER PLASMAS , 1991 .

[18]  B. Leblanc,et al.  Effect of current profile shape on second region access in high‐beta tokamak plasmas , 1990 .

[19]  G. Rewoldt,et al.  Toroidal microinstability studies of high‐temperature tokamaks , 1990 .

[20]  R. Yoshino Current profile modification in JT-60 pellet injection experiments , 1989 .

[21]  R. D. Burris,et al.  Eight‐shot pneumatic pellet injection system for the tokamak fusion test reactor , 1987 .

[22]  Tadashi Sekiguchi,et al.  Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research , 1987 .

[23]  Enhancement of confinement in tokamaks , 1986 .

[24]  P. Rebut,et al.  Magnetic topology, disruptions and electron heat transport , 1986 .

[25]  Brian Labombard,et al.  Energy confinement of high-density pellet-fueled plasmas in the Alcator C tokamak , 1984 .

[26]  R. Goldston Energy confinement scaling in Tokamaks: some implications of recent experiments with Ohmic and strong auxiliary heating , 1984 .

[27]  D. McCune,et al.  New techniques for calculating heat and particle source rates due to neutral beam injection in axisymmetric tokamaks , 1981 .