Development of modular school design as a permanent solution for post-disaster reconstruction in Indonesia

Purpose This paper describes the development and implementation of a modular school building design prototype to support “build back better” after the disaster. The purpose of this paper is to bridge the gap between the two standard practices of post-disaster reconstruction: the quickly temporary construction and the permanent solution with longer time to complete. Design/methodology/approach The modular school design prototype was developed based on three design criteria established to achieve a relatively quick construction with good quality as a post-disaster permanent solution. The prototype was implemented in Kerandangan Village, Lombok and evaluated to review its compliance with the design criteria. Findings Three design strategies were proposed to respond to the main design criteria: the use of modular units and components, the material durability and availability, and the “plug-and-play” configuration system. Through these strategies, the prototype demonstrated the ability to perform as a permanent solution to be implemented in a short time. The prototype evaluation suggests some possible improvement to ensure a more efficient process and further replicability. Originality/value The development of the modular design bridges the gap between temporary and permanent approach for post-disaster school reconstruction. The highlighted criteria and the proposed design strategies contribute to the “build back better” attempt by providing better learning experiences for children through a replicable modular design that could be flexibly adapted to various local contexts.

[1]  Guillaume Habert,et al.  A matter of speed: The impact of material choice in post-disaster reconstruction , 2019, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction.

[2]  Nandy Putra,et al.  Thinking Ecology for Architecture: Exploration of Cool Pocket , 2018 .

[3]  Robert H. Crawford,et al.  TIME-EFFICIENT POST-DISASTER HOUSING RECONSTRUCTION WITH PREFABRICATED MODULAR STRUCTURES , 2014 .

[4]  Stephen Platt,et al.  Factors Affecting the Speed and Quality of Post-Disaster Recovery and Resilience , 2017 .

[5]  Akira Wada,et al.  Damage mitigation for school buildings in seismically vulnerable regions , 2011 .

[6]  Isti Surjandari,et al.  SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION FORSUSTAINBALE WORLD , 2017 .

[7]  Jorge M. Branco,et al.  The role of temporary accommodation buildings for post-disaster housing reconstruction , 2015 .

[8]  Iftekhar Ahmed,et al.  An overview of post‐disaster permanent housing reconstruction in developing countries , 2011 .

[9]  Ryuichi Yatabe,et al.  Vulnerability assessment and retrofitting of existing school buildings: a case study of Aceh , 2012 .

[10]  Kyoon-Tai Kim,et al.  Sustainability in modular design and construction: a case study of ‘The Stack’ , 2014 .

[11]  David Finkelhor,et al.  Disasters, victimization, and children's mental health. , 2010, Child development.

[12]  G. Lizarralde Decentralizing (re)construction: Agriculture cooperatives as a vehicle for reconstruction in Colombia , 2010 .

[13]  Thomas Bock,et al.  A New Approach to Building Design Modularization , 2014 .

[14]  Bijan Samali,et al.  Development of an Innovative Modular Foam-Filled Panelized System for Rapidly Assembled Postdisaster Housing , 2018, Buildings.

[15]  Salman Azhar,et al.  Causes of Discrepancies between Design and Construction in the Pakistan Construction Industry , 2018 .

[16]  Yenny Rahmayati Reframing “building back better” for post-disaster housing design: a community perspective , 2016 .