CCL2-dependent infiltrating macrophages promote angiogenesis in progressive liver fibrosis

Objectives In chronic liver injury, angiogenesis, the formation of new blood vessels from pre-existing ones, may contribute to progressive hepatic fibrosis and to development of hepatocellular carcinoma. Although hypoxia-induced expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) occurs in advanced fibrosis, we hypothesised that inflammation may endorse hepatic angiogenesis already at early stages of fibrosis. Design Angiogenesis in livers of c57BL/6 mice upon carbon tetrachloride- or bile duct ligation-induced chronic hepatic injury was non-invasively monitored using in vivo contrast-enhanced micro computed tomography (µCT) and ex vivo anatomical µCT after hepatic Microfil perfusion. Functional contributions of monocyte-derived macrophage subsets for angiogenesis were explored by pharmacological inhibition of CCL2 using the Spiegelmer mNOX-E36. Results Contrast-enhanced in vivo µCT imaging allowed non-invasive monitoring of the close correlation of angiogenesis, reflected by functional hepatic blood vessel expansion, with experimental fibrosis progression. On a cellular level, inflammatory monocyte-derived macrophages massively accumulated in injured livers, colocalised with newly formed vessels in portal tracts and exhibited pro-angiogenic gene profiles including upregulated VEGF and MMP9. Functional in vivo and anatomical ex vivo µCT analyses demonstrated that inhibition of monocyte infiltration by targeting the chemokine CCL2 prevented fibrosis-associated angiogenesis, but not fibrosis progression. Monocyte-derived macrophages primarily fostered sprouting angiogenesis within the portal vein tract. Portal vein diameter as a measure of portal hypertension depended on fibrosis, but not on angiogenesis. Conclusions Inflammation-associated angiogenesis is promoted by CCL2-dependent monocytes during fibrosis progression. Innovative in vivo µCT methodology can accurately monitor angiogenesis and antiangiogenic therapy effects in experimental liver fibrosis.

[1]  R. Knuechel,et al.  Micro-CT imaging of tumor angiogenesis: quantitative measures describing micromorphology and vascularization. , 2014, The American journal of pathology.

[2]  T. Luedde,et al.  Chemokine receptor CCR6‐dependent accumulation of γδ T cells in injured liver restricts hepatic inflammation and fibrosis , 2014, Hepatology.

[3]  Steffen Jung,et al.  On-site education of VEGF-recruited monocytes improves their performance as angiogenic and arteriogenic accessory cells , 2013, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[4]  René M. Botnar,et al.  Elastin‐based molecular MRI of liver fibrosis , 2013, Hepatology.

[5]  D. Schuppan,et al.  Evolving therapies for liver fibrosis. , 2013, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[6]  P. Carmeliet,et al.  Role of vascular endothelial growth factor in the pathophysiology of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in two rodent models , 2013, Hepatology.

[7]  H. Nagano,et al.  TIE2‐expressing monocytes as a diagnostic marker for hepatocellular carcinoma correlates with angiogenesis , 2013, Hepatology.

[8]  C. Lewis,et al.  Macrophage regulation of tumor responses to anticancer therapies. , 2013, Cancer cell.

[9]  Fabian Kiessling,et al.  Non-invasive imaging for studying anti-angiogenic therapy effects , 2013, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[10]  Yongming Dai,et al.  Gamna-Gandy Bodies of the Spleen Detected with Susceptibility Weighted Imaging: Maybe a New Potential Non-Invasive Marker of Esophageal Varices , 2013, PloS one.

[11]  A. Tessitore,et al.  The Inflammatory Microenvironment in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Pivotal Role for Tumor-Associated Macrophages , 2012, BioMed research international.

[12]  J. Fallowfield,et al.  Edinburgh Research Explorer Differential Ly-6C expression identifies the recruited macrophage phenotype, which orchestrates the regression of murine liver fibrosis Differential Ly-6C expression identi fi es the recruited macrophage phenotype, which orchestrates the regression of murine liver fi brosis , 2022 .

[13]  S. Yamada,et al.  Molecular MR imaging of liver fibrosis: a feasibility study using rat and mouse models. , 2012, Journal of hepatology.

[14]  S. Friedman,et al.  Antifibrotic Activity of Sorafenib in Experimental Hepatic Fibrosis: Refinement of Inhibitory Targets, Dosing, and Window of Efficacy In Vivo , 2012, Digestive Diseases and Sciences.

[15]  F. Tacke Functional role of intrahepatic monocyte subsets for the progression of liver inflammation and liver fibrosis in vivo , 2012, Fibrogenesis & tissue repair.

[16]  Laurent Castera,et al.  Noninvasive methods to assess liver disease in patients with hepatitis B or C. , 2012, Gastroenterology.

[17]  F. Kiessling,et al.  Virtual elastic sphere processing enables reproducible quantification of vessel stenosis at CT and MR angiography. , 2011, Radiology.

[18]  T. Luedde,et al.  Pharmacological inhibition of the chemokine CCL2 (MCP-1) diminishes liver macrophage infiltration and steatohepatitis in chronic hepatic injury , 2011, Gut.

[19]  P. Carmeliet,et al.  Molecular mechanisms and clinical applications of angiogenesis , 2011, Nature.

[20]  S. Coulon,et al.  Angiogenesis in chronic liver disease and its complications , 2011, Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver.

[21]  T. Luedde,et al.  The fractalkine receptor CX3CR1 protects against liver fibrosis by controlling differentiation and survival of infiltrating hepatic monocytes , 2010, Hepatology.

[22]  O. Rosmorduc,et al.  Hypoxia: a link between fibrogenesis, angiogenesis, and carcinogenesis in liver disease. , 2010, Seminars in liver disease.

[23]  B. Tura,et al.  Ultrasound imaging in an experimental model of fatty liver disease and cirrhosis in rats , 2010, BMC veterinary research.

[24]  P. Allavena,et al.  Tumor‐associated macrophages (TAM) as major players of the cancer‐related inflammation , 2009, Journal of leukocyte biology.

[25]  F. Ginhoux,et al.  Hepatic recruitment of the inflammatory Gr1+ monocyte subset upon liver injury promotes hepatic fibrosis , 2009, Hepatology.

[26]  Ralph Sinkus,et al.  Magnetic resonance elastography for the noninvasive staging of liver fibrosis. , 2008, Gastroenterology.

[27]  P. Carmeliet,et al.  Antiangiogenic treatment with Sunitinib ameliorates inflammatory infiltrate, fibrosis, and portal pressure in cirrhotic rats , 2007, Hepatology.

[28]  C. Ng,et al.  Diagnostic value of Doppler assessment of the hepatic and portal vessels and ultrasound of the spleen in liver disease , 2004, European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology.

[29]  V. Paradis,et al.  Sampling variability of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C , 2003, Hepatology.

[30]  D. Wendum,et al.  Hypoxia‐induced VEGF and collagen I expressions are associated with angiogenesis and fibrogenesis in experimental cirrhosis , 2002, Hepatology.

[31]  F. Sánchez‐Madrid,et al.  CONCISE REVIEW IN MECHANISMS OF DISEASE Angiogenesis in Chronic Inflammatory Liver Disease , 2004 .