Validation of a bone analog model for studies of sternal closure.

BACKGROUND The incidence of serious sternal wound complications may be reduced with improvements in closure methods. Biomechanical testing of median sternotomy closures in cadavers has proven useful but is limited by availability, high cost, and wide variations in the material properties of the sterna. This study tests whether artificial sterna can be used to replace whole cadavers in sternal closure testing. METHODS Two common wire closure techniques were tested using both whole cadavers and artificial sternal models formed from bone analogue material. Sternal models were molded from polyurethane foam (20 lbs/ft3) to simulate the mechanical properties observed in human cadaveric sterna. The force vector previously identified as the most detrimental to sternal cohesion (lateral traction) was used to stress the closures. Separation of the incision site was measured at the manubrium, midsternum, and xiphoid and data were compared between cadaver and bench test groups. RESULTS Sternal separations recorded in cadavers were found to be similar to bench test results for both closure types. Data variability within test groups was found to be consistently lower using artificial sterna, where peak standard deviations for sternal motion averaged less than half that measured in cadavers. CONCLUSIONS Results suggest that anatomic sternal models formed from solid polyurethane foam can be used to approximate the biomechanical properties of cadaveric sterna and that reliable information regarding sternal closure stability can be secured through this means. Moreover, bench test data were shown to be less variable than cadaveric results, thus enhancing the power to detect small differences in sternal fixation stability.

[1]  J. Magovern,et al.  Mechanical analysis of midline sternotomy wound closure. , 1999, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[2]  G. Delaria,et al.  Sternal wound complications. Management and results. , 1980, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[3]  R. Habib,et al.  Factors predisposing to median sternotomy complications. Deep vs superficial infection. , 1996, Chest.

[4]  L. Levin,et al.  Sternal plating for the treatment of sternal nonunion. , 1996, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[5]  M Saleh,et al.  A biomechanical study of median sternotomy closure techniques. , 1999, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[6]  J. Szivek,et al.  Characterization of a synthetic foam as a model for human cancellous bone. , 1993, Journal of applied biomaterials : an official journal of the Society for Biomaterials.

[7]  J. Marshall,et al.  Sternal wound complications , 1985 .

[8]  Lanny V Griffin,et al.  A biomechanical comparison of three sternotomy closure techniques. , 2002, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[9]  R. Bergström,et al.  Sternal wound complications--incidence, microbiology and risk factors. , 1997, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.