Network plasticity of pluripotency transcription factors in embryonic stem cells

Transcription factor (TF) networks are thought to regulate embryonic stem cell (ESC) pluripotency. However, TF expression dynamics and regulatory mechanisms are poorly understood. We use reporter mouse ESC lines allowing non-invasive quantification of Nanog or Oct4 protein levels and continuous long-term single-cell tracking and quantification over many generations to reveal diverse TF protein expression dynamics. For cells with low Nanog expression, we identified two distinct colony types: one re-expressed Nanog in a mosaic pattern, and the other did not re-express Nanog over many generations. Although both expressed pluripotency markers, they exhibited differences in their TF protein correlation networks and differentiation propensities. Sister cell analysis revealed that differences in Nanog levels are not necessarily accompanied by differences in the expression of other pluripotency factors. Thus, regulatory interactions of pluripotency TFs are less stringently implemented in individual self-renewing ESCs than assumed at present.

[1]  T. Blauwkamp,et al.  Embryonic stem cells require Wnt proteins to prevent differentiation to epiblast stem cells , 2011, Nature Cell Biology.

[2]  H. Ng,et al.  The transcriptional regulation of pluripotency , 2012, Cell Research.

[3]  Takashi Hiiragi,et al.  Stochastic patterning in the mouse pre-implantation embryo , 2007, Development.

[4]  Julian Gingold,et al.  Zfp281 mediates Nanog autorepression through recruitment of the NuRD complex and inhibits somatic cell reprogramming , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  A. Sharov,et al.  Totipotent Embryonic Stem Cells Arise in Ground-State Culture Conditions , 2013, Cell reports.

[6]  Nicola Festuccia,et al.  OCT4/SOX2‐independent Nanog autorepression modulates heterogeneous Nanog gene expression in mouse ES cells , 2012, The EMBO journal.

[7]  Fabian J Theis,et al.  Hierarchical Differentiation of Myeloid Progenitors Is Encoded in the Transcription Factor Network , 2011, PloS one.

[8]  R. Jaenisch,et al.  Single-cell analysis reveals that expression of nanog is biallelic and equally variable as that of other pluripotency factors in mouse ESCs. , 2013, Cell stem cell.

[9]  B. Doble,et al.  The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal , 2008, Nature.

[10]  J. García-Ojalvo,et al.  Towards a statistical mechanics of cell fate decisions. , 2012, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[11]  X. Chen,et al.  The Oct4 and Nanog transcription network regulates pluripotency in mouse embryonic stem cells , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[12]  Richard A Young,et al.  Control of the Embryonic Stem Cell State , 2011, Cell.

[13]  Ingo Roeder,et al.  A Model-Based Analysis of Culture-Dependent Phenotypes of mESCs , 2014, PloS one.

[14]  Aviv Regev,et al.  Deconstructing transcriptional heterogeneity in pluripotent stem cells , 2014, Nature.

[15]  Sheng Zhong,et al.  A core Klf circuitry regulates self-renewal of embryonic stem cells , 2008, Nature Cell Biology.

[16]  S. Emmott,et al.  Defining an essential transcription factor program for naïve pluripotency , 2014, Science.

[17]  I. Burtscher,et al.  Foxa2 regulates polarity and epithelialization in the endoderm germ layer of the mouse embryo , 2009, Development.

[18]  Philipp S. Hoppe,et al.  Single-cell technologies sharpen up mammalian stem cell research , 2014, Nature Cell Biology.

[19]  F. Markowetz,et al.  Systems-level dynamic analyses of fate change in murine embryonic stem cells , 2009, Nature.

[20]  Xin Li,et al.  Identification of Thioaptamer Ligand against E-Selectin: Potential Application for Inflamed Vasculature Targeting , 2010, PloS one.

[21]  J. Nichols,et al.  Nanog safeguards pluripotency and mediates germline development , 2007, Nature.

[22]  Heiko Lickert,et al.  Biallelic expression of nanog protein in mouse embryonic stem cells. , 2013, Cell stem cell.

[23]  Yang Yang,et al.  Kruppel-like Factor 4 (Klf4) Prevents Embryonic Stem (ES) Cell Differentiation by Regulating Nanog Gene Expression* , 2010, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[24]  Shin-Ichi Nishikawa,et al.  Continuous single-cell imaging of blood generation from haemogenic endothelium , 2009, Nature.

[25]  M. Murakami,et al.  The Homeoprotein Nanog Is Required for Maintenance of Pluripotency in Mouse Epiblast and ES Cells , 2003, Cell.

[26]  Ingo Roeder,et al.  Nanog Variability and Pluripotency Regulation of Embryonic Stem Cells - Insights from a Mathematical Model Analysis , 2010, PloS one.

[27]  Ping Li,et al.  Embryonic stem cell self‐renewal pathways converge on the transcription factor Tfcp2l1 , 2013, The EMBO journal.

[28]  A. Stewart,et al.  Recombineering, transfection, Western, IP and ChIP methods for protein tagging via gene targeting or BAC transgenesis. , 2011, Methods.

[29]  N. D. Clarke,et al.  Integration of External Signaling Pathways with the Core Transcriptional Network in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2008, Cell.

[30]  Michael B. Elowitz,et al.  Dynamic Heterogeneity and DNA Methylation in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2014, Molecular cell.

[31]  Max Endele,et al.  Quantitative single-cell approaches to stem cell research. , 2014, Cell stem cell.

[32]  Tetsushi Sakuma,et al.  Stochastic promoter activation affects Nanog expression variability in mouse embryonic stem cells , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[33]  Petr Svoboda,et al.  Stochastic NANOG fluctuations allow mouse embryonic stem cells to explore pluripotency , 2014, Development.

[34]  C. Peterson,et al.  Stem cell states, fates, and the rules of attraction. , 2009, Cell stem cell.

[35]  Ge Guo,et al.  Nanog Is the Gateway to the Pluripotent Ground State , 2009, Cell.

[36]  Timm Schroeder,et al.  Long-term single-cell imaging of mammalian stem cells , 2011, Nature Methods.

[37]  Richard J. Beckman,et al.  A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output From a Computer Code , 2000, Technometrics.

[38]  Timm Schroeder,et al.  Imaging stem-cell-driven regeneration in mammals , 2008, Nature.

[39]  Jens Timmer,et al.  An error model for protein quantification , 2007, Bioinform..

[40]  Jonathan M. Monk,et al.  Wdr5 Mediates Self-Renewal and Reprogramming via the Embryonic Stem Cell Core Transcriptional Network , 2011, Cell.

[41]  A. Smith,et al.  Self-renewal of pluripotent embryonic stem cells is mediated via activation of STAT3. , 1998, Genes & development.

[42]  Anagha Joshi,et al.  Esrrb Is a Pivotal Target of the Gsk3/Tcf3 Axis Regulating Embryonic Stem Cell Self-Renewal , 2012, Cell stem cell.

[43]  J. Nichols,et al.  Functional Expression Cloning of Nanog, a Pluripotency Sustaining Factor in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2003, Cell.

[44]  S. Orkin,et al.  An Extended Transcriptional Network for Pluripotency of Embryonic Stem Cells , 2008, Cell.

[45]  Frank Buchholz,et al.  A new logic for DNA engineering using recombination in Escherichia coli , 1998, Nature Genetics.

[46]  Fabian J. Theis,et al.  Efficient fluorescence image normalization for time lapse movies , 2011 .

[47]  R. Young,et al.  Stem Cells, the Molecular Circuitry of Pluripotency and Nuclear Reprogramming , 2008, Cell.

[48]  J. Miyazaki,et al.  Quantitative expression of Oct-3/4 defines differentiation, dedifferentiation or self-renewal of ES cells , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[49]  J. Nichols,et al.  BMP Induction of Id Proteins Suppresses Differentiation and Sustains Embryonic Stem Cell Self-Renewal in Collaboration with STAT3 , 2003, Cell.

[50]  Hannah H. Chang,et al.  Non-genetic heterogeneity — a mutation-independent driving force for the somatic evolution of tumours , 2009, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[51]  Avi Ma’ayan,et al.  Systems biology of stem cell fate and cellular reprogramming , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[52]  Georg Fuellen,et al.  The PluriNetWork: An Electronic Representation of the Network Underlying Pluripotency in Mouse, and Its Applications , 2010, PloS one.

[53]  J. García-Ojalvo,et al.  Correlations Between the Levels of Oct4 and Nanog as a Signature for Naïve Pluripotency in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells , 2012, Stem cells.

[54]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Adaptive Stochastic Gradient Descent Optimisation for Image Registration , 2009, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[55]  Paul Bertone,et al.  Identification of the missing pluripotency mediator downstream of leukaemia inhibitory factor , 2013, The EMBO journal.

[56]  Nicola Festuccia,et al.  Esrrb Is a Direct Nanog Target Gene that Can Substitute for Nanog Function in Pluripotent Cells , 2012, Cell stem cell.

[57]  Avi Ma'ayan,et al.  Construction and Validation of a Regulatory Network for Pluripotency and Self-Renewal of Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[58]  Debbie L C van den Berg,et al.  An Oct4-Centered Protein Interaction Network in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2010, Cell stem cell.

[59]  Ian Chambers,et al.  The transcriptional foundation of pluripotency , 2009, Development.

[60]  J. Nichols,et al.  Oct4 and LIF/Stat3 additively induce Krüppel factors to sustain embryonic stem cell self-renewal. , 2009, Cell stem cell.

[61]  M. Babu,et al.  Dissecting ensemble networks in ES cell populations reveals micro-heterogeneity underlying pluripotency. , 2012, Molecular bioSystems.

[62]  H. Ng,et al.  Reduced Oct4 Expression Directs a Robust Pluripotent State with Distinct Signaling Activity and Increased Enhancer Occupancy by Oct4 and Nanog , 2013, Cell stem cell.

[63]  H. Ng,et al.  KLF4 and PBX1 Directly Regulate NANOG Expression in Human Embryonic Stem Cells , 2009, Stem cells.

[64]  Fabian J. Theis,et al.  MCA: Multiresolution Correlation Analysis, a graphical tool for subpopulation identification in single-cell gene expression data , 2014, BMC Bioinformatics.

[65]  Mihail Sarov,et al.  Recombineering BAC transgenes for protein tagging. , 2011, Methods.

[66]  Patrick S. Stumpf,et al.  Nanog-dependent feedback loops regulate murine embryonic stem cell heterogeneity , 2012, Nature Cell Biology.

[67]  Hitoshi Niwa,et al.  A parallel circuit of LIF signalling pathways maintains pluripotency of mouse ES cells , 2009, Nature.

[68]  C. Lim,et al.  Regulated Fluctuations in Nanog Expression Mediate Cell Fate Decisions in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2009, PLoS biology.

[69]  Matt Thomson,et al.  Pluripotency Factors in Embryonic Stem Cells Regulate Differentiation into Germ Layers , 2011, Cell.

[70]  Philipp S. Hoppe,et al.  Hematopoietic Cytokines Can Instruct Lineage Choice , 2009, Science.

[71]  Dmitri Papatsenko,et al.  Tex10 Coordinates Epigenetic Control of Super-Enhancer Activity in Pluripotency and Reprogramming. , 2015, Cell stem cell.