Probabilistic seismic performance evaluation of composite frames with concrete-filled steel tube columns and buckling-restrained braces

The concrete-filled steel tube (CFT) composite frames using blind bolts and buckling-restrained braces (BRBs) have been studied with the development of building industrialization and energy dissipation technology. However, there has been no research so far on the probabilistic seismic fragility analysis for the blind-bolted end-plate CFT composite frames with BRBs (BRB-BECFT). Therefore, a total of 6-, 9-, 12- and 20-story BRB-BECFT prototype structures were designed based on the performance-based plastic design method. The results obtained from nonlinear static and dynamic analyses indicated that the four structures achieved predefined performance objectives in terms of story drift, joint rotation, and BRB ductility demand. Subsequently, fragility curves including non-collapse and collapse states were established to evaluate the behavior of the structure for a given intensity measure using the incremental dynamic analysis approach. Meanwhile, the geometric mean of spectral acceleration over a period range (Sa,avg) was selected as the intensity measure to assess the structural collapse capacity. Results showed that the adoption of Sa,avg can result in 32–42% lower data dispersion for the determination of collapse point, and simplification of the process of calculation of the collapse margin ratio of a structure. Furthermore, based on the combination of Sa,avg, residual story drift and BRB core plate strain, a framework of probabilistic seismic damage analysis of structures for combined damage evaluation at three levels of the system, subsystem, and component was summarized and conducted by the 6- and 12-story case study. This is practically useful to assess structural damage state after an earthquake because it could present more information on the probability distribution of various damage scenarios.

[1]  Hamid Valipour,et al.  Experimental study of sustainable high strength steel flush end plate beam-to-column composite joints with deconstructable bolted shear connectors , 2016 .

[2]  Zhan Wang,et al.  Effect of non‐moment braced frame seismic deformations on buckling‐restrained brace end connection behavior: Theoretical analysis and subassemblage tests , 2016 .

[3]  En-Feng Deng,et al.  Experimental study on seismic performance of double-level yielding buckling-restrained braced concrete frames , 2020 .

[4]  L. Chen,et al.  Cyclic experimental and analytical studies of buckling-restrained braces with various gusset connections , 2018 .

[5]  Kuo-Wei Liao,et al.  Probabilistic seismic performance evaluation of steel moment frame using high-strength and high-ductility steel , 2018, Construction and Building Materials.

[6]  Ebrahim Tahmasebi Damage Analysis of Steel Concentrically Braced Frame Systems under Seismic Conditions , 2016 .

[7]  Jingfeng Wang,et al.  Seismic performance assessment of blind bolted steel-concrete composite joints based on pseudo-dynamic testing , 2017 .

[8]  C. Baniotopoulos,et al.  Pseudo-dynamic response and analytical evaluation of blind bolted CFT frames with BRBs , 2020 .

[9]  B. Uy,et al.  Experimental and numerical behaviour of blind bolted flush endplate composite connections , 2019, Journal of Constructional Steel Research.

[10]  Haitao Wang,et al.  Cyclic Experimental Behavior of CFST Column to Steel Beam Frames with Blind Bolted Connections , 2018, International Journal of Steel Structures.

[11]  Chen Quan,et al.  A novel brace with partial buckling restraint: An experimental and numerical investigation , 2017 .

[12]  Yuyin Wang,et al.  Study of buckling-restrained braces with concrete infilled GFRP tubes , 2019, Thin-Walled Structures.

[13]  C. Baniotopoulos,et al.  Seismic design and pseudo-dynamic tests of blind-bolted CFT frames with buckling-restrained braces , 2019 .

[14]  Chun-Lin Wang,et al.  Experimental and numerical studies on hysteretic behavior of all-steel bamboo-shaped energy dissipaters , 2018, Engineering Structures.

[15]  Subhash C. Goel,et al.  Performance-Based Plastic Design: Earthquake-Resistant Steel Structures , 2008 .

[16]  Subhash C. Goel,et al.  A Seismic Design Lateral Force Distribution Based on Inelastic State of Structures , 2007 .

[17]  Jingfeng Wang,et al.  Cyclic testing of steel beam blind bolted to CFST column composite frames with SBTD concrete slabs , 2017 .

[18]  Canxing Qiu,et al.  Testing of Buckling-Restrained Braces with Replaceable Steel Angle Fuses , 2018 .

[19]  Stefano Lenci,et al.  Comparative fragility methods for seismic assessment of masonry buildings located in Muccia (Italy) , 2019, Journal of Building Engineering.

[20]  Bin Wu,et al.  A novel type of angle steel buckling‐restrained brace: Cyclic behavior and failure mechanism , 2011 .

[21]  Gaetano Manfredi,et al.  Experimental tests on full‐scale RC unretrofitted frame and retrofitted with buckling‐restrained braces , 2012 .

[23]  Kihak Lee,et al.  Seismic assessment of damaged piloti‐type RC building subjected to successive earthquakes , 2014 .

[24]  Chun-Lin Wang,et al.  Effect of the unbonding materials on the mechanic behavior of all-steel buckling-restrained braces , 2016 .

[25]  Viswanath Kammula,et al.  Application of hybrid‐simulation to fragility assessment of the telescoping self‐centering energy dissipative bracing system , 2014 .

[27]  Yong Lu,et al.  Seismic response tests and analytical assessment of blind bolted assembly CFST frames with beam-connected SPSWs , 2019, Engineering Structures.

[28]  Lin-Hai Han,et al.  Tests and calculations for hollow structural steel (HSS) stub columns filled with self-consolidating concrete (SCC) , 2005 .

[29]  C. Allin Cornell,et al.  Probabilistic Basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency Steel Moment Frame Guidelines , 2002 .

[30]  Junxian Zhao,et al.  Experimental performance of buckling-restrained braces with steel cores of H-section and half-wavelength evaluation of higher-order local buckling , 2017 .

[32]  Yuanjie Li,et al.  Performance-Based Design and Optimization of Buckling Restrained Knee Braced Truss Moment Frame , 2014 .

[33]  Keh-Chyuan Tsai,et al.  Pseudo‐dynamic test of a full‐scale CFT/BRB frame—Part II: Seismic performance of buckling‐restrained braces and connections , 2008 .

[34]  F. Mazzolani,et al.  PLASTIC DESIGN OF SEISMIC RESISTANT STEEL FRAMES , 1997 .

[35]  Bruce R. Ellingwood,et al.  Quantifying and communicating uncertainty in seismic risk assessment , 2009 .

[36]  Jerome F. Hajjar,et al.  Mixed Finite-Element Modeling of Rectangular Concrete-Filled Steel Tube Members and Frames under Static and Dynamic Loads , 2010 .