Effects of Climate Change on Range Forage Production in the San Francisco Bay Area

The San Francisco Bay Area in California, USA is a highly heterogeneous region in climate, topography, and habitats, as well as in its political and economic interests. Successful conservation strategies must consider various current and future competing demands for the land, and should pay special attention to livestock grazing, the dominant non-urban land-use. The main objective of this study was to predict changes in rangeland forage production in response to changes in temperature and precipitation projected by downscaled output from global climate models. Daily temperature and precipitation data generated by four climate models were used as input variables for an existing rangeland forage production model (linear regression) for California’s annual rangelands and projected on 244 12 km x 12 km grid cells for eight Bay Area counties. Climate model projections suggest that forage production in Bay Area rangelands may be enhanced by future conditions in most years, at least in terms of peak standing crop. However, the timing of production is as important as its peak, and altered precipitation patterns could mean delayed germination, resulting in shorter growing seasons and longer periods of inadequate forage quality. An increase in the frequency of extremely dry years also increases the uncertainty of forage availability. These shifts in forage production will affect the economic viability and conservation strategies for rangelands in the San Francisco Bay Area.

[1]  M. Power,et al.  Species Interactions Reverse Grassland Responses to Changing Climate , 2007, Science.

[2]  C. Field,et al.  Plants reverse warming effect on ecosystem water balance , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  R. Ingram,et al.  Planned Herbivory in the Management of Wildfire Fuels , 2007 .

[4]  Christopher B. Field,et al.  Grassland responses to three years of elevated temperature, CO2, precipitation, and N deposition , 2003 .

[5]  C. D’Antonio,et al.  Grazing Management on California’s Mediterranean Grasslands , 2007 .

[6]  J. Y. King,et al.  Elevated CO2 and defoliation effects on a shortgrass steppe: Forage quality versus quantity for ruminants , 2005 .

[7]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[8]  B. Baker,et al.  Comparison of the effects of different climate change scenarios on rangeland livestock production , 1993 .

[9]  Oregon State The Impact of Climate Change on California's Ecosystem Services , 2009 .

[10]  Neil K. McDougald,et al.  Correlation of degree-days with annual herbage yields and livestock gains. , 1988 .

[11]  Impacts of climate change on soil moisture and evapotranspiration in reconstructed watersheds in northern Alberta, Canada , 2012 .

[12]  William A. Williams,et al.  Predicting peak standing crop on annual range using weather variables. , 1989 .

[13]  D. Ackerly,et al.  Climate change impacts on California vegetation: physiology, life history, and ecosystem change. , 2012 .

[14]  L. Huntsinger,et al.  Viewpoint: Sustaining rangeland landscapes: a social and ecological process , 1996 .

[15]  B. Santer,et al.  Climate scenarios for California , 2006 .

[16]  Randall D. Jackson,et al.  The sensitivity of annual grassland carbon cycling to the quantity and timing of rainfall , 2008 .

[17]  Alfred H. Murphy,et al.  Predicted forage yield based on fall precipitation in California annual grasslands. , 1970 .

[18]  R. Chaplin-Kramer,et al.  Value of Wildland Habitat for Supplying Pollination Services to Californian Agriculture , 2011 .

[19]  C. Stokes,et al.  Climate change and Australian livestock systems: impacts, research and policy issues , 2008 .

[20]  S. Logan,et al.  Calculating Heat Units via a Sine Function , 1983, Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science.