Students As Teachers and Communicators

[1]  Justin Fletcher,et al.  Team-oriented software practicum , 1994 .

[2]  Christopher D. Hundhausen,et al.  An Empirical Study of the “Prototype Walkthrough”: A Studio-Based Activity for HCI Education , 2012, TCHI.

[3]  Forrest Shull,et al.  The empirical investigation of Perspective-Based Reading , 1995, Empirical Software Engineering.

[4]  Christopher D. Hundhausen,et al.  Talking about code: Integrating pedagogical code reviews into early computing courses , 2013, TOCE.

[5]  Laurie A. Williams,et al.  The effects of "pair-pressure" and "pair-learning" on software engineering education , 2000, Thirteenth Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training.

[6]  Michelle K. Smith,et al.  Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Colleen M. Kehoe,et al.  Bringing design dialog to HCI education , 2001, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[8]  R. Slavin.  Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. , 1996 .

[9]  Sue Fitzgerald,et al.  Pair programming in education: a literature review , 2011, Comput. Sci. Educ..

[10]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities , 1984 .

[11]  Chris Sauer,et al.  Technical Reviews: A Behaviorally Motivated Program of Research , 2022 .

[12]  Sarah A. Douglas,et al.  Teaching HCI Design With the Studio Approach , 2003, Comput. Sci. Educ..

[13]  Karen Swan,et al.  An Investigation into the Efficacy of the Studio Model at the High School Level , 2006 .

[14]  Michael E. Fagan.  Advances in software inspections , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[15]  Emilia Mendes,et al.  Empirical Studies of Pair Programming for CS/SE Teaching in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[16]  C. F. Bond,et al.  Individual differences in dyadic cooperative learning. , 1998 .

[17]  A. Bandura,et al.  Self-efficacy beliefs as shapers of children's aspirations and career trajectories. , 2001, Child development.

[18]  Richard S. Moog,et al.  Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) , 2008 .

[19]  E. Mazur,et al.  Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and results , 2001 .

[20]  Christopher D. Hundhausen,et al.  The design of a programming environment to support greater social awareness and participation in early computing courses , 2015 .

[21]  Christopher D. Hundhausen,et al.  Designing, visualizing, and discussing algorithms within a CS 1 studio experience: An empirical study , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[22]  Philip Crowther,et al.  Understanding the signature pedagogy of the design studio and the opportunities for its technological enhancement , 2013 .

[23]  S. Chaiklin.  The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky's analysis of learning and instruction. , 2003 .

[24]  Michelle K. Smith,et al.  Why Peer Discussion Improves Student Performance on In-Class Concept Questions , 2009, Science.

[25]  Charles E. McDowell,et al.  Pair programming improves student retention, confidence, and program quality , 2006, CACM.

[26]  Kristy Elizabeth Boyer,et al.  Exploring the Pair Programming Process: Characteristics of Effective Collaboration , 2017, SIGCSE.

[27]  David Hestenes,et al.  Interpreting the force concept inventory: A response to March 1995 critique by Huffman and Heller , 1995 .

[28]  Cynthia Bailey Lee,et al.  Can peer instruction be effective in upper-division computer science courses? , 2013, TOCE.

[29]  Colleen M. Lewis.  Is pair programming more effective than other forms of collaboration for young students? , 2011, Comput. Sci. Educ..

[30]  Helen H. Hu,et al.  A Framework for Levels of Student Participation and Stages of Relevant Curriculum , 2017, Computing in Science & Engineering.