Everyday practices and the (un)making of ‘Fortress Europe’: Introduction to the special issue

The borders of Europe are erected and guarded through cultural practices as much as through border control and security technologies. Cultural Studies have been crucial in revealing how everyday, particularly media-oriented practices, make and unmake this ‘Fortress’. Yet, until now, the focus has been mostly on how migrants use or are represented through media discourses and technologies. This introduction essay argues that the signifier ‘Fortress Europe’—and its central premise of restraining mobility for some in order to enable freedom for others—also gains meaning in and through socio-cultural practices that we may not (as) immediately associate with the physical crossing of European borders. Particular practices that are discussed in this introduction and examined in the seven original articles of the special issue are: public opinion research, the public mobilization of emotions, negotiating identity in an ‘ancestral homeland’, the consumption of (sports) media, the production of a radio talk show and film archives, as well as the activist use of social media. Broadening scholarly attention to these kinds of sociocultural practices provides an important addition to understanding how power operates across social spheres and discursive orders. In addition, their identification also offers valuable opportunities to understand how and why some practices are particularly pertinent or effective in cementing or destabilizing Fortress Europe. This line of inquiry is visible throughout this special issue, despite the diversity of theoretical frameworks and empirical sites used in the contributing articles.

[1]  F. Webber Lights in the Distance: exile and refuge at the borders of Europe , 2018, Race & Class.

[2]  S. Loong ‘This country, law very strong’: Securitization beyond the border in the everyday lives of Bangladeshi migrant workers in Singapore , 2018 .

[3]  Shaka Yesufu White innocence: paradoxes of colonialism and race , 2018 .

[4]  J. Hermes,et al.  On the move: Twentieth anniversary editorial of the European Journal of Cultural Studies , 2017 .

[5]  Lilie Chouliaraki,et al.  Hospitability: The Communicative Architecture of Humanitarian Securitization at Europe's Borders , 2017 .

[6]  Karina Horsti Visibility without voice: Media witnessing irregular migrants in BBC online news journalism , 2016 .

[7]  Jiska Engelbert,et al.  Securitizing cultural diversity: Dutch public broadcasting in post-multicultural and de-pillarized times , 2014 .

[8]  K. Leurs Digital Throwntogetherness: Young Londoners Negotiating Urban Politics of Difference and Encounter on Facebook , 2014 .

[9]  Alana Lentin,et al.  The Crises of Multiculturalism: Racism in a Neoliberal Age , 2011 .

[10]  Lilie Chouliaraki Post-humanitarianism , 2010, Humanitarianism.

[11]  A. Morning Toward a Sociology of Racial Conceptualization for the 21st Century , 2009 .

[12]  Ruth Wodak,et al.  The Discursive Construction of National Identity , 2009 .

[13]  Ingegerd Rydin,et al.  Migrant children's digital stories , 2007 .

[14]  Olga Bailey Transnational Identities and the Media , 2007 .

[15]  Stuart Hall,et al.  Cultural studies and its theoretical legacies , 2006 .

[16]  Jef Huysmans,et al.  The Politics of Insecurity: Fear, Migration and Asylum in the EU , 2006 .

[17]  J. Huysmans A Foucaultian view on spill-over: freedom and security in the EU , 2004 .

[18]  J. Hollifield,et al.  The Emerging Migration State 1 , 2004 .

[19]  Srirupa Roy Politics of Insecurity , 2004 .

[20]  Jef Huysmans,et al.  The European Union and the Securitization of Migration , 2000 .

[21]  Jef Huysmans,et al.  Security! What Do You Mean? , 1998 .

[22]  L. Grossberg The cultural studies' crossroads blues , 1998 .

[23]  J. Hollifield,et al.  Immigrants, Markets, and States: The Political Economy of Postwar Europe. , 1992 .