Evaluation of Second Look Procedures for Pediatric Cholesteatomas

Objective. This study aims to identify factors that may help predict recurrence, the need for second-look operations, and other outcomes in the pediatric population. Study Design. Case series with chart review. Setting. Tertiary medical center. Subjects and Methods. Five hundred and seventeen ears in 493 patients underwent primary acquired cholesteatoma resection over a 37-year period. Demographic (age, sex, and other medical conditions), cholesteatoma laterality, presence of perforation or otorrhea on otoscopic exam, preoperative and most recent audiologic data, and detailed intraoperative data were collected. Results. Overall, 47.2% of patients underwent second-look operations, with 48.0% having recurrent cholesteatoma visualized with attic recurrence being the most common location. In total, 22.7% of all patients in this study had recurrent disease. Factors at initial operation associated with a statistically significant increased risk of recurrence included cholesteatoma in the sinus tympani (odds ratio = 2.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.36-3.22) and incus destruction (1.65; 1.01-2.71). Conclusion. The authors have successfully identified multiple factors at the time of initial operation that can have significant postoperative implications.

[1]  E. Myers,et al.  Recurrence of Attic Cholesteatoma: Different Methods of Estimating Recurrence Rates , 2000, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[2]  S. Stern,et al.  Cholesteatoma in the pediatric population: Prognostic indicators for surgical decision making , 1992, The Laryngoscope.

[3]  M. Tos A New Pathogenesis of Mesotympanic (Congenital) Cholesteatoma , 2000, The Laryngoscope.

[4]  E. Dodson,et al.  Intact canal wall mastoidectomy with tympanoplasty for cholesteatoma in children , 1998, The Laryngoscope.

[5]  M. Stankovic Audiologic Results of Surgery for Cholesteatoma: Short- and Long-Term Follow-Up of Influential Factors , 2008, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[6]  J. W. House,et al.  Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium Guidelines for the Evaluation of Results of Treatment of Conductive Hearing Loss ∗ , 1995, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[7]  J. Shohet,et al.  The management of pediatric cholesteatoma. , 2002, Otolaryngologic clinics of North America.

[8]  J. Duclos,et al.  Preference for the closed technique in the management of cholesteatoma of the middle ear in children: a retrospective study of 215 consecutive patients treated over 10 years. , 2000, The American journal of otology.

[9]  S. Schraff,et al.  Pediatric Cholesteatoma: A Retrospective Review , 2004 .

[10]  S. Vowler,et al.  A 5-Year Observational Study of the Outcome in Pediatric Cholesteatoma Surgery , 2007, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[11]  M. Glasscock,et al.  Cholesteatoma in children , 1981, The Laryngoscope.

[12]  Sun O Chang,et al.  Prognostic factors of recidivism in pediatric cholesteatoma surgery. , 2003, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology.