Advanced ovarian cancer correlation of histologic grade with response to therapy and survival

In order to determine the prognostic and therapeutic importance of histologic grade for patients with advanced ovarian cancer, the pathologic specimens from 82 patients with Stage III‐IV disease (as defined by the International Federation of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (F.I.G.O.)) were reviewed and graded by two methods. A system based on cytologic detail using both the degree of anaplasia and the number of undifferentiated cells, (modified Broders' Grades 1–4) was found to be particularly useful because it identified four groups with different survival outcomes as well as an apparent differential response to chemotherapy. Specifically, the overall improvement of survival in patients with Stage III‐IV disease observed in a prospective study of combination chemotherapy was related primarily to an increased survival of patients with Grade 2 and 3 lesions. Survival in Grade 1 patients was markedly better than for Grade 4 patients, but in neither case did survival appear to be influenced by the choice of chemotherapy. These observations suggest that prospective clinical trials assessing the efficacy of chemotherapy should employ cytologic grades as a separate stratification factor since chemotherapy for advanced disease may have to be tailored, in part, to the histologic grade.

[1]  R. Fisher,et al.  Advanced ovarian adenocarcinoma. A prospective clinical trial of melphalan (L-PAM) versus combination chemotherapy. , 1978, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  R. Young,et al.  Recent advances in the staging and treatment of ovarian cancer. , 1977, The Medical clinics of North America.

[3]  R. Hoover,et al.  Acute leukemia after alkylating-agent therapy of ovarian cancer. , 1977, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  R. Fisher,et al.  Advances in the staging and treatment of ovarian cancer , 1977, Cancer.

[5]  T. Day,et al.  Epithelial carcinoma of the ovary:prognostic importance of histologic grade. , 1975, National Cancer Institute monograph.

[6]  Rutledge Fn,et al.  Epithelial carcinoma of the ovary:prognostic importance of histologic grade. , 1975 .

[7]  R. Young,et al.  Peritoneoscopy in the staging and follow-up of ovarian cancer. , 1975, Seminars in oncology.

[8]  D. Decker,et al.  Histology of epithelial tumors of the ovary: clinical usefulness and prognostic significance of the histologic classification and grading. , 1975, Seminars in oncology.

[9]  S. Sommers,et al.  Histologic and nuclear grading and stromal reactions as indices for prognosis in ovarian cancer. , 1975, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  V. Devita,et al.  The design of clinical trials in the therapy of ovarian carcinoma. , 1974, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[11]  V. Devita,et al.  Chemotherapy of advanced ovarian carcinoma: a prospective randomized comparison of phenylalanine mustard and high dose cyclophosphamide. , 1974, Gynecologic oncology.

[12]  W. R. Hart,et al.  Borderline and malignant mucinous tumors of the ovary. Histologic criteria and clinical behavior , 1973, Cancer.

[13]  Woodruff Jd,et al.  The biologic behavior of low-grade papillary serous carcinoma of the ovary. , 1972 .

[14]  J. Woodruff,et al.  The Biologic Behavior of Low‐Grade Papillary Serous Carcinoma of the Ovary , 1972, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[15]  J. Dyson,et al.  Factors Influencing Survival in Carcinoma of the Ovary , 1971, British Journal of Cancer.

[16]  P. Kolstad,et al.  Clinical and Histologic Studies of Ovarian Carcinoma: Long - Term Follow - Up of 990 Cases , 1971, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[17]  N. Breslow A generalized Kruskal-Wallis test for comparing K samples subject to unequal patterns of censorship , 1970 .

[18]  S. Sommers,et al.  Staging, grading and histochemistry of ovarian epithelial tumors. , 1969, Clinical obstetrics and gynecology.

[19]  N. Mantel Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration. , 1966, Cancer chemotherapy reports.

[20]  W. B. McAllister,et al.  Ovarian carcinoma. The problems of staging and grading. , 1966, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[21]  H. Taylor,et al.  Ovarian carcinoma; a review of 200 primary and 51 secondary cases. , 1949, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[22]  W. Taylor,et al.  Proceedings: Grading of gynecologic malignancy: epithelial ovarian cancer. , 1972, Proceedings. National Cancer Conference.

[23]  R. Beck,et al.  Correlation of histologic grading with 5-years survival rates in endometrial carcinoma. , 1967, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.