Sensitivity to interaural time difference with bilateral cochlear implants: Development over time and effect of interaural electrode spacing.

Sensitivity to interaural time difference (ITD) in constant-amplitude pulse trains was measured in four sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant (CI) subjects. The sensitivity measurements were made as a function of time beginning directly after the second ear was implanted, continued for periods of months before subjects began wearing bilateral sound processors, and extended for months while the subjects used bilateral sound processors in day-to-day listening. Measurements were also made as a function of the relative position of the left/right electrodes. The two subjects with the shortest duration of binaural deprivation before implantation demonstrated ITD sensitivity soon after second-ear implantation (before receiving the second sound processor), while the other two did not demonstrate sensitivity until after months of daily experience using bilateral processors. The interaural mismatch in electrode position required to decrease ITD sensitivity by a factor of 2 (half-width) for CI subjects was five times greater than the half-width for interaural carrier-frequency disparity in normal-hearing subjects listening to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated high-frequency tones. This large half-width is likely to contribute to poor binaural performance in CI users, especially in environments with multiple broadband sound sources.

[1]  R. G. Klumpp,et al.  Some Measurements of Interaural Time Difference Thresholds , 1956 .

[2]  R. V. Hoesel,et al.  Sensitivity to binaural timing in bilateral cochlear implant users. , 2007 .

[3]  Becky B. Poon,et al.  Sound localization and interaural time sensitivity with bilateral cochlear implants , 2006 .

[4]  B. Wilson,et al.  Speech Processors for Auditory Prostheses , 2001 .

[5]  B. Papsin,et al.  Auditory brainstem activity in children with 9–30 months of bilateral cochlear implant use , 2007, Hearing Research.

[6]  B Robert Peters,et al.  Importance of Age and Postimplantation Experience on Speech Perception Measures in Children With Sequential Bilateral Cochlear Implants , 2007, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[7]  J L Punch,et al.  Nonsense-syllable recognition in noise using monaural and binaural listening strategies. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  R. Hartmann,et al.  Central Responses to Electrical Stimulation , 2004 .

[9]  P Nopp,et al.  Sound Localization in Bilateral Users of MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ Cochlear Implants , 2004, Ear and hearing.

[10]  Elaine Saunders,et al.  Psychophysics of a prototype peri-modiolar cochlear implant electrode array , 2001, Hearing Research.

[11]  W M Hartmann,et al.  On the minimum audible angle--a decision theory approach. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  T. Yin,et al.  Interaural time sensitivity in medial superior olive of cat. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  M. Pelizzone,et al.  Binaural interaction in a cochlear implant patient , 1990, Hearing Research.

[14]  R. V. Hoesel Exploring the benefits of bilateral cochlear implants. , 2004 .

[15]  William M. Rabinowitz,et al.  Better speech recognition with cochlear implants , 1991, Nature.

[16]  P. Nopp,et al.  Head Shadow, Squelch, and Summation Effects in Bilateral Users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ Cochlear Implant , 2004, Ear and hearing.

[17]  R Plomp,et al.  The effect of head-induced interaural time and level differences on speech intelligibility in noise. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Piotr Majdak,et al.  Lateralization discrimination of interaural time delays in four-pulse sequences in electric and acoustic hearing. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  Bernhard Laback,et al.  Sensitivity to Interaural Level and Envelope Time Differences of Two Bilateral Cochlear Implant Listeners Using Clinical Sound Processors , 2004, Ear and hearing.

[20]  S Kuwada,et al.  Binaural interaction in low-frequency neurons in inferior colliculus of the cat. IV. Comparison of monaural and binaural response properties. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  K Saberi,et al.  Some considerations on the use of adaptive methods for estimating interaural-delay thresholds. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  Robert F Labadie,et al.  Interaural Time and Level Difference Thresholds for Acoustically Presented Signals in Post-Lingually Deafened Adults Fitted with Bilateral Cochlear Implants Using CIS+ Processing , 2007, Ear and hearing.

[23]  Blake S Wilson,et al.  Cochlear implants: some likely next steps. , 2003, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[24]  G. Clark,et al.  Psychophysical and speech perception studies: a case report on a binaural cochlear implant subject. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  E R Hafter,et al.  Detection of interaural differences of intensity in trains of high-frequency clicks as a function of interclick interval and number. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  H Steven Colburn,et al.  Binaural sensitivity as a function of interaural electrode position with a bilateral cochlear implant user. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  J. Guinan,et al.  Single auditory units in the superior olivary complex , 1972 .

[28]  Richard Van Hoesel,et al.  Sound-Direction Identification, Interaural Time Delay Discrimination, and Speech Intelligibility Advantages in Noise for a Bilateral Cochlear Implant User , 2002, Ear and hearing.

[29]  Richard S. Tyler,et al.  Cochlear Implantation: Relationships with Research on Auditory Deprivation and Acclimatization , 1996, Ear and hearing.

[30]  D. Grantham,et al.  Horizontal-Plane Localization of Noise and Speech Signals by Postlingually Deafened Adults Fitted With Bilateral Cochlear Implants* , 2007, Ear and hearing.

[31]  D T Lawson,et al.  Bilateral cochlear implants controlled by a single speech processor. , 1998, The American journal of otology.

[32]  A. Parkinsonb,et al.  Bilateral cochlear implants in children , 2004 .

[33]  Zachary M. Smith,et al.  Using Evoked Potentials to Match Interaural Electrode Pairs with Bilateral Cochlear Implants , 2007, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[34]  J. Guinan,et al.  Single Auditory Units in the Superior Olivary Complex: II: Locations of Unit Categories and Tonotopic Organization , 1972 .

[35]  R. Tyler,et al.  Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  Aaron Parkinson,et al.  Simultaneous Bilateral Cochlear Implantation in Adults: A Multicenter Clinical Study , 2006, Ear and hearing.

[37]  D. D. Greenwood A cochlear frequency-position function for several species--29 years later. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  Simon R. Oldfield,et al.  Acuity of Sound Localisation: A Topography of Auditory Space. I. Normal Hearing Conditions , 1984, Perception.

[39]  M. Liberman The cochlear frequency map for the cat: labeling auditory-nerve fibers of known characteristic frequency. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[40]  Andrew J. King,et al.  Plasticity of Binaural Systems , 2004 .

[41]  E R Hafter,et al.  Detection of interaural differences of time in trains of high-frequency clicks as a function of interclick interval and number. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[42]  Robert F Labadie,et al.  Speech Recognition for Unilateral and Bilateral Cochlear Implant Modes in the Presence of Uncorrelated Noise Sources , 2006, Ear and hearing.

[43]  Ruth Y Litovsky,et al.  Bilateral Cochlear Implants in Children: Localization Acuity Measured with Minimum Audible Angle , 2006, Ear and hearing.

[44]  G M Clark,et al.  Psychophysical studies with two binaural cochlear implant subjects. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[45]  W. Baumgartner,et al.  Effects of interaural time differences in fine structure and envelope on lateral discrimination in electric hearing. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[46]  B. Seeber,et al.  Localization cues with bilateral cochlear implants. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[47]  Thomas Lenarz,et al.  Binaural speech unmasking and localization in noise with bilateral cochlear implants using envelope and fine-timing based strategies. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[48]  Ervin R. Hafter,et al.  Discrimination of interaural delays in complex waveforms: Spectral effects , 1981 .

[49]  M. Dorman,et al.  The influence of a sensitive period on central auditory development in children with unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants , 2005, Hearing Research.

[50]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[51]  M Pelizzone,et al.  Within-patient longitudinal speech reception measures with continuous interleaved sampling processors for ineraid implanted subjects. , 1999, Ear and hearing.

[52]  Robert K. Shepherd,et al.  Deafness-Induced Changes in the Auditory Pathway: Implications for Cochlear Implants , 2001, Audiology and Neurotology.