Modeling Urban Morphology by Unifying Diffusion-Limited Aggregation and Stochastic Gravitation

More than 30 years ago, Diffusion-Limited Aggregation (DLA) has been studied as mechanism to generate structures sharing similarities with real-world cities. Recently, a stochastic gravitation model (SGM) has been proposed for the same purpose but representing a completely different mechanism. Both approaches have advantages and disadvantages, while e.g. the dendrites emerging via DLA are visually very different from real-world cities, the SGM does not preserve undeveloped locations close to the city center. Here we propose a unification of both mechanisms, i.e. a particle moves randomly and turns into an urban site with a probability that depends on the proximity to already developed sites. We study the cluster size distributions of the structures generated by both models and find that SGM generates more balanced distributions. We also propose a way to assess to which extent the largest cluster is a primate city and find that in both models, beyond certain parameter value, the size of the largest cluster becomes inconsistent with being drawn from the same distribution of remaining clusters.

[1]  Hernán D. Rozenfeld,et al.  The Area and Population of Cities: New Insights from a Different Perspective on Cities , 2009, 1001.5289.

[2]  F. Schweitzer,et al.  Estimation of megacity growth: simple rules versus complex phenomena. , 1998, Applied geography.

[4]  George Kingsley Zipf,et al.  Human Behaviour and the Principle of Least Effort: an Introduction to Human Ecology , 2012 .

[5]  L. Pietronero,et al.  Fractal Dimension of Dielectric Breakdown , 1984 .

[6]  M. Batty,et al.  Diffusion-limited aggregation and the fractal nature of urban growth , 1989 .

[7]  Diego Rybski,et al.  Distance-weighted city growth. , 2012, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[8]  Helen Couclelis,et al.  The Death of Distance , 1996 .

[9]  M. Batty,et al.  Urban Growth and Form: Scaling, Fractal Geometry, and Diffusion-Limited Aggregation , 1989 .

[10]  Michael Batty,et al.  The Morphology of Urban Land Use , 1988 .

[11]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data , 2007, SIAM Rev..

[12]  Adam Okulicz-Kozaryn,et al.  The city size distribution debate: Resolution for US urban regions and megalopolitan areas , 2012 .

[13]  J. Ord,et al.  Evaluating the friction of distance parameter in gravity models , 1974 .

[14]  K. Soo Zipf's law for cities: a cross-country investigation , 2005 .

[15]  L. Sander,et al.  Diffusion-limited aggregation, a kinetic critical phenomenon , 1981 .

[16]  M. Batty Generating Urban Forms from Diffusive Growth , 1991 .

[17]  A. S. Linsky SOME GENERALIZATIONS CONCERNING PRIMATE CITIES1 , 1965 .

[18]  F. Auerbach Das Gesetz der Bevölkerungskonzentration. , 1913 .

[19]  Emanuele Strano,et al.  Precise mapping, spatial structure and classification of all the human settlements on Earth , 2020 .

[20]  H. Stanley,et al.  Modelling urban growth patterns , 1995, Nature.

[21]  Colin S Gillespie,et al.  Fitting Heavy Tailed Distributions: The poweRlaw Package , 2014, 1407.3492.

[22]  Clémentine Cottineau,et al.  MetaZipf. A dynamic meta-analysis of city size distributions , 2016, PloS one.

[23]  J. Friedmann Locational Aspects of Economic Development , 1956 .