Feature engineering of machine-learning chemisorption models for catalyst design

Abstract We integrate machine-learning algorithms into the descriptor-based design approach for rapid screening of transition-metal catalysts. By engineering numerical representation of surface metal atoms using easily accessible features such as the local electronegativity and the effective coordination number that are dependent on the surroundings of an adsorption site, together with the intrinsic properties of active metal atoms including the electronegativity, ionic potential, and electron affinity, the machine-learning model optimized with ∼250 ab initio adsorption energies on bimetallic alloys can capture complex, non-linear adsorbate/substrate interactions with the root mean squared errors (RMSE) ∼0.12 eV. We applied the model to search for {100}-terminated multimetallic copper (Cu) catalysts for electrochemical CO 2 reduction where the *CO adsorption energy represents an important efficiency metric. Compared with the traditional high-throughput computational and experimental trial-and-error approach, the machine-learning chemisorption models have great potential in accelerating the discovery of interesting catalytic materials. As the complexity of catalyst structures increases, new features will be needed to learn underlying correlations and avoid introducing significant errors on top of the average DFT prediction errors expected with standard semi-local generalized gradient approximation (GGA) functionals.

[1]  Felix A Faber,et al.  Crystal structure representations for machine learning models of formation energies , 2015, 1503.07406.

[2]  J. G. Chen,et al.  Role of strain and ligand effects in the modification of the electronic and chemical properties of bimetallic surfaces. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[3]  John R. Kitchin,et al.  New solid-state table: estimating d-band characteristics for transition metal atoms , 2010 .

[4]  Ture R. Munter,et al.  Scaling properties of adsorption energies for hydrogen-containing molecules on transition-metal surfaces. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[5]  Burke,et al.  Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[6]  D. Su,et al.  Platinum-monolayer shell on AuNi(0.5)Fe nanoparticle core electrocatalyst with high activity and stability for the oxygen reduction reaction. , 2010, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[7]  Jacobsen,et al.  Interatomic interactions in the effective-medium theory. , 1987, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[8]  M. Baskes,et al.  Semiempirical, Quantum Mechanical Calculation of Hydrogen Embrittlement in Metals , 1983 .

[9]  D. Vanderbilt,et al.  Soft self-consistent pseudopotentials in a generalized eigenvalue formalism. , 1990, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[10]  H. Monkhorst,et al.  SPECIAL POINTS FOR BRILLOUIN-ZONE INTEGRATIONS , 1976 .

[11]  Stefano de Gironcoli,et al.  Core level shifts of undercoordinated Pt atoms. , 2008, The Journal of chemical physics.

[12]  Somnath Datta,et al.  Informatics guided discovery of surface structure-chemistry relationships in catalytic nanoparticles. , 2014, The Journal of chemical physics.

[13]  J. M. García‐Lastra,et al.  Fast prediction of adsorption properties for platinum nanocatalysts with generalized coordination numbers. , 2014, Angewandte Chemie.

[14]  Walter A. Harrison,et al.  Electronic structure and the properties of solids : the physics of the chemical bond , 1980 .

[15]  Jörg Behler,et al.  Constructing high‐dimensional neural network potentials: A tutorial review , 2015 .

[16]  Hong Yang,et al.  Platinum-based electrocatalysts with core-shell nanostructures. , 2011, Angewandte Chemie.

[17]  Matthew M. Montemore,et al.  Predicting and Comparing C–M and O–M Bond Strengths for Adsorption on Transition Metal Surfaces , 2014 .

[18]  H. Xin,et al.  Communications: Exceptions to the d-band model of chemisorption on metal surfaces: The dominant role of repulsion between adsorbate states and metal d-states. , 2010, The Journal of chemical physics.

[19]  J Behler,et al.  Representing potential energy surfaces by high-dimensional neural network potentials , 2014, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[20]  A. Sutton,et al.  Long-range Finnis–Sinclair potentials , 1990 .

[21]  F. Calle‐Vallejo,et al.  Theoretical considerations on the electroreduction of CO to C2 species on Cu(100) electrodes. , 2013, Angewandte Chemie.

[22]  Stefano de Gironcoli,et al.  QUANTUM ESPRESSO: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials , 2009, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[23]  D. G. Pettifor,et al.  Analytic bond-order potentials beyond Tersoff-Brenner. I. Theory , 1999 .

[24]  Jens K. Nørskov,et al.  Electronic factors determining the reactivity of metal surfaces , 1995 .

[25]  Kristof T. Schütt,et al.  How to represent crystal structures for machine learning: Towards fast prediction of electronic properties , 2013, 1307.1266.

[26]  Thomas Bligaard,et al.  The Brønsted–Evans–Polanyi relation and the volcano curve in heterogeneous catalysis , 2004 .

[27]  A. Vojvodić,et al.  Effects of d-band shape on the surface reactivity of transition-metal alloys , 2014 .

[28]  Gadi Rothenberg,et al.  Predicting adsorption on metals: simple yet effective descriptors for surface catalysis. , 2013, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.