Augmented Reality (AR) for Assembly Processes Design and Experimental Evaluation

Augmented reality (AR) for assembly processes is a new kind of computer support for a traditional industrial domain. This new application of AR technology is called ARsembly. The intention of this article is to describe a typical scenario for assembly and service personnel and how they might be supported by AR. For this purpose, tasks with different degrees of difficulty were selected from an authentic assembly process. In addition, 2 other kinds of assembly support media (a paper manual and a tutorial by an expert) were examined in order to compare them with ARsembly. The results showed that the assembly times varied according to the different support conditions. AR support proved to be more suitable for difficult tasks than the paper manual, whereas for easier tasks the use of a paper manual did not differ significantly from AR support. Tasks done under the guidance of an expert were completed most rapidly. Some of the information obtained in this investigation also indicated important considerations for improving future ARsembly applications.

[1]  Steven K. Feiner,et al.  Knowledge-based augmented reality , 1993, CACM.

[2]  Paul Jackson,et al.  Testing information delivery methods using augmented reality , 2001, Proceedings IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Augmented Reality.

[3]  Tyrone L. Vincent,et al.  An adaptive estimator for registration in augmented reality , 1999, Proceedings 2nd IEEE and ACM International Workshop on Augmented Reality (IWAR'99).

[4]  J. Tiffin,et al.  The Purdue pegboard; norms and studies of reliability and validity. , 1948, The Journal of applied psychology.

[5]  Lawrence W. Stark,et al.  Evaluation of the Effects of a Head-mounted Display on Ocular Accommodation , 1998, Presence.

[6]  Axel Pinz,et al.  Building a hybrid tracking system: integration of optical and magnetic tracking , 1999, Proceedings 2nd IEEE and ACM International Workshop on Augmented Reality (IWAR'99).

[7]  Frank Biocca,et al.  Virtual Eyes Can Rearrange Your Body: Adaptation to Visual Displacement in See-Through, Head-Mounted Displays , 1998, Presence.

[8]  Kurt Landau,et al.  Ergonomie und Organisation in der Montage , 2001 .

[9]  Robert S. Kennedy,et al.  A Comparison of Cybersickness Incidences, Symptom Profiles, Measurement Techniques, and Suggestions for Further Research , 1997, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[10]  Ulrich Neumann,et al.  Cognitive, performance, and systems issues for augmented reality applications in manufacturing and maintenance , 1998, Proceedings. IEEE 1998 Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium (Cat. No.98CB36180).

[11]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Calibration propagation for image augmentation , 1999, Proceedings 2nd IEEE and ACM International Workshop on Augmented Reality (IWAR'99).

[12]  Ronald Azuma,et al.  Tracking requirements for augmented reality , 1993, CACM.

[13]  P. Milgram,et al.  A Taxonomy of Mixed Reality Visual Displays , 1994 .

[14]  Luc Van Gool,et al.  Markerless augmented reality with a real-time affine region tracker , 2001, Proceedings IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Augmented Reality.