The impact of chatbot conversational skill on engagement and perceived humanness

ABSTRACT Conversational agents (CAs)—frequently operationalized as chatbots—are computer systems that leverage natural language processing to engage in conversations with human users. CAs are often operationalized as chatbots which are used for many applications including technical support, customer service, and digital personal assistants. Despite their widespread use, little research to date has investigated how improving the conversational skill of a CA impacts user perceptions of the agent. To elucidate this relationship, this research uses Social Presence Theory to describe how conversational skill influences perceived social presence and ultimately anthropomorphism of a chatbot. We conducted a series of studies in which 450 participants interacted with CAs exhibiting varying levels of conversational skill. We show that people perceive a more skilled CA to be more socially present and anthropomorphic than a less skilled CA. This research advances the knowledge of computer-human interface in information systems, as CA research to date has largely focused on the technical challenges rather than the behavioral questions of how users interact with CAs.

[1]  H. Grice Logic and conversation , 1975 .

[2]  Ning Wang,et al.  Does the contingency of agents' nonverbal feedback affect users' social anxiety? , 2008, AAMAS.

[3]  C. Nass,et al.  Machines and Mindlessness , 2000 .

[4]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  Does Humanity Matter? Analyzing the Importance of Social Cues and Perceived Agency of a Computer System for the Emergence of Social Reactions during Human-Computer Interaction , 2012, Adv. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[5]  Diane Proudfoot,et al.  Anthropomorphism and AI: Turingʼs much misunderstood imitation game , 2011, Artif. Intell..

[6]  Joonhwan Lee,et al.  Designing a Chatbot for a Brief Motivational Interview on Stress Management: Qualitative Case Study , 2019, Journal of medical Internet research.

[7]  E. Perse,et al.  Predicting computer‐mediated communication in a college class , 1992 .

[8]  Jaeki Song,et al.  Dynamics of Trust Revision: Using Health Infomediaries , 2008, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  The influence of conversational agent embodiment and conversational relevance on socially desirable responding , 2018, Decis. Support Syst..

[10]  Louis-Philippe Morency,et al.  Virtual Rapport 2.0 , 2011, IVA.

[11]  Radoslaw Niewiadomski,et al.  How Is Believability of a Virtual Agent Related to Warmth, Competence, Personification, and Embodiment? , 2011, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[12]  Norah E. Dunbar,et al.  Testing the Interactivity Model: Communication Processes, Partner Assessments, and the Quality of Collaborative Work , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[13]  Theo Araujo,et al.  Living up to the chatbot hype: The influence of anthropomorphic design cues and communicative agency framing on conversational agent and company perceptions , 2018, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[14]  Gargi Dasgupta,et al.  COBOTS - A Cognitive Multi-Bot Conversational Framework for Technical Support , 2018, AAMAS.

[15]  Judee K. Burgoon,et al.  Application of Expectancy Violations Theory to communication with and judgments about embodied agents during a decision-making task , 2016, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[16]  Anbang Xu,et al.  A New Chatbot for Customer Service on Social Media , 2017, CHI.

[17]  Shruti Sannon,et al.  "Alexa is my new BFF": Social Roles, User Satisfaction, and Personification of the Amazon Echo , 2017, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[18]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Acting Like Humans? Anthropomorphism and Consumer’s Willingness to Pay in Electronic Commerce , 2019, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Raymond Chiong,et al.  Avatars and Embodied Agents in Experimental Information Systems Research: A Systematic Review and Conceptual Framework , 2019, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[20]  T. M. Holtgraves,et al.  Perceiving artificial social agents , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[21]  Jurek Kirakowski,et al.  The Perception of Artificial Intelligence as "Human" by Computer Users , 2007, HCI.

[22]  Brian H. Spitzberg,et al.  Conversational skill and locus of perception , 1985 .

[23]  Ben J. A. Kröse,et al.  Relating conversational expressiveness to social presence and acceptance of an assistive social robot , 2010, Virtual Reality.

[24]  Matthew L. Jensen,et al.  Effects of Automated and Participative Decision Support in Computer-Aided Credibility Assessment , 2009, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[25]  Milena M. Head,et al.  Manipulating perceived social presence through the web interface and its impact on attitude towards online shopping , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[26]  Joseph Weizenbaum,et al.  and Machine , 1977 .

[27]  Paul Benjamin Lowry,et al.  The CMC Interactivity Model: How Interactivity Enhances Communication Quality and Process Satisfaction in Lean-Media Groups , 2009, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[28]  Matthias Scheutz,et al.  A mismatch in the human realism of face and voice produces an uncanny valley , 2011, i-Perception.

[29]  Ying Liu,et al.  An evaluation of the chat and knowledge delivery components of a low-level dialog system: The AZ-ALICE experiment , 2007, Decis. Support Syst..

[30]  D. Gefen,et al.  Consumer trust in B2C e-Commerce and the importance of social presence: experiments in e-Products and e-Services , 2004 .

[31]  Anna-Maria Seeger,et al.  Designing Anthropomorphic Conversational Agents: Development and Empirical Evaluation of a Design Framework , 2018, ICIS.

[32]  Justin Scott Giboney,et al.  The effect of conversational agent skill on user behavior during deception , 2019, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[33]  Adam J. Berinsky,et al.  Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk , 2012, Political Analysis.

[34]  Marios Koufaris,et al.  Applying the Technology Acceptance Model and Flow Theory to Online Consumer Behavior , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[35]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Detecting Deceptive Chat-Based Communication Using Typing Behavior and Message Cues , 2013, TMIS.

[36]  Justine Cassell,et al.  External manifestations of trustworthiness in the interface , 2000, CACM.

[37]  Y. Kobori,et al.  MP15-03 NOVEL APPLICATION FOR SEXUAL TRANSMITTED INFECTION SCREENING WITH AN AI CHATBOT , 2018 .

[38]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Evaluating Anthropomorphic Product Recommendation Agents: A Social Relationship Perspective to Designing Information Systems , 2009, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[39]  A. L. Baylor Promoting motivation with virtual agents and avatars: role of visual presence and appearance , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[40]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  Social snacking with a virtual agent - On the interrelation of need to belong and effects of social responsiveness when interacting with artificial entities , 2018, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[41]  J. Bailenson,et al.  Virtual Humans and Persuasion: The Effects of Agency and Behavioral Realism , 2007 .

[42]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[43]  Hsinchun Chen,et al.  Leveraging Question Answer technology to address terrorism inquiry , 2007, Decis. Support Syst..

[44]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Computers are social actors , 1994, CHI '94.

[45]  Ning Wang,et al.  Creating Rapport with Virtual Agents , 2007, IVA.

[46]  Paul D. Cheney,et al.  The Impact of Group Size and Social Presence on Small-Group Communication , 2006 .

[47]  Youngme Moon Intimate Exchanges: Using Computers to Elicit Self-Disclosure from Consumers , 2000 .

[48]  Frank Biocca,et al.  Toward a More Robust Theory and Measure of Social Presence: Review and Suggested Criteria , 2003, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[49]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Trusting Humans and Avatars: A Brain Imaging Study Based on Evolution Theory , 2014, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[50]  Yves Rosseel,et al.  lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling , 2012 .

[51]  S. Shyam Sundar,et al.  Anthropomorphism of computers: Is it mindful or mindless? , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[52]  S. Shyam Sundar,et al.  Theoretical Importance of Contingency in Human-Computer Interaction , 2016, Commun. Res..

[53]  J. Burgoon,et al.  Nonverbal Behaviors, Persuasion, and Credibility , 1990 .