Dynamic simulation and control of a combustion turbine process for biogas derived methane

Abstract Combined cycle power plants that use both gas and steam turbines have much higher efficiencies than traditional steam power plants and are increasingly utilized for both natural gas and biogas based power generation. Gas is burned using high-pressure air to produce a high-temperature, high-pressure gas that is fed into a gas turbine driving a generator. The lower-pressure exhaust gas from the combustion turbine is still at high temperature, so it can be used to produce steam to drive a steam turbine that generates additional power. This paper illustrates that the dynamic simulation of these turbine systems is not straightforward because of numerical integration and variable specification (free or fixed) issues. An effective control structure for handling the very large hour-to-hour daily disturbances in electric power load is developed. The numerical example is for a low-pressure biogas process, but the turbine simulation procedure is applicable to any combustion turbine process.

[1]  Tong Seop Kim,et al.  Economic evaluation of biogas and natural gas co-firing in gas turbine combined heat and power systems , 2014 .

[2]  Stanley M. Walas,et al.  Chemical Process Equipment : Selection and Design , 1988 .

[3]  K. Blok,et al.  Response to ‘Burden of proof: A comprehensive review of the feasibility of 100% renewable-electricity systems’ , 2017, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[4]  G. Euverink,et al.  A Technological Overview of Biogas Production from Biowaste , 2017 .

[5]  Mariano Martín,et al.  Optimal production of power in a combined cycle from manure based biogas , 2016 .

[6]  C. Bradshaw,et al.  Burden of proof: A comprehensive review of the feasibility of 100% renewable-electricity systems , 2017 .

[7]  J. Solarte-Toro,et al.  Evaluation of biogas and syngas as energy vectors for heat and power generation using lignocellulosic biomass as raw material , 2018 .

[8]  Miguel Angel Gonzalez-Salazar,et al.  Review of the operational flexibility and emissions of gas- and coal-fired power plants in a future with growing renewables , 2018 .

[9]  A. Olabi,et al.  Biogas production from algal biomass: A review , 2015 .

[10]  Tongjun Zhang Methods of Improving the Efficiency of Thermal Power Plants , 2020, Journal of Physics: Conference Series.

[11]  Z Y Han,et al.  Comparison study on qualitative and quantitative risk assessment methods for urban natural gas pipeline network. , 2011, Journal of hazardous materials.

[12]  E. de Oliveira Fernandes,et al.  Impacts of Load Shifting on Renewable Energy Integration , 2017 .

[13]  Tong Seop Kim,et al.  Comparative economic analysis of gas turbine-based power generation and combined heat and power systems using biogas fuel , 2014 .

[14]  Rimika Kapoor,et al.  Modeling the Water Scrubbing Process and Energy Requirements for CO2 Capture to Upgrade Biogas to Biomethane , 2014 .

[15]  Dalia Patino-Echeverri,et al.  Quantification of the water-use reduction associated with the transition from coal to natural gas in the US electricity sector , 2019 .

[16]  J B van Lier,et al.  Autogenerative high pressure digestion: anaerobic digestion and biogas upgrading in a single step reactor system. , 2011, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[17]  Martin Miltner,et al.  Membrane biogas upgrading processes for the production of natural gas substitute , 2010 .

[18]  Firdaus Basrawi,et al.  The Optimum Performance of the Combined Cycle Power Plant: A Comprehensive Review , 2017 .

[19]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Carbon dioxide emissions continue to grow amidst slowly emerging climate policies , 2020 .