Workplace Innovations and Employee Outcomes: Evidence from Finland

In the recent literature on workplace innovations, two competing views stand out. One strand of literature emphasizes positive outcomes for employees in the form of increased discretion, improved job security, and enhanced job satisfaction. In turn, critics argue that workplace innovations lead to increased job intensity and mental strain, and compromise job security. We address these issues by using a representative data set on individual employees from Finland. Our results indicate that workplace innovations are mainly associated with beneficial outcomes for employees. They are consistent with the view that institutional features of the Finnish labor market may mediate the outcomes.

[1]  Susan Parks.  Improving Workplace Performance: Historical and Theoretical Contexts. , 1995 .

[2]  B. Gerhart,et al.  The Impact of Human Resource Management on Organizational Performance: Progress and Prospects , 1996 .

[3]  Jed DeVaro.  Teams, Autonomy, and the Financial Performance of Firms , 2006, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[4]  Paul Osterman,et al.  Work Reorganization in an Era of Restructuring: Trends in Diffusion and Effects on Employee Welfare , 2000 .

[5]  A. Clark.  Job Satisfaction in Britain , 1996 .

[6]  Mark A. Huselid.  The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity, and Corporate Financial Performance , 1995 .

[7]  E. Poutsma,et al.  EUROPEAN FOUNDATION for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions , 1999 .

[8]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  The impact of cultural values on job satisfaction and organizational commitment in self-managing work teams: The mediating role of employee resistance. , 2001 .

[9]  P. Kalmi,et al.  Workplace innovations and employee outcomes , 2005 .

[10]  C. Berggren.  Lean Production—The End of History? , 1993 .

[11]  J. Godard.  A Critical Assessment of the High-Performance Paradigm , 2004 .

[12]  Sandra E. Black,et al.  How Workers Fare When Employers Innovate , 2003 .

[13]  Maury Gittleman,et al.  Is There a Wage Payoff to Innovative Work Practices? , 1999 .

[14]  John Godard,et al.  High Performance and the Transformation of Work? The Implications of Alternative Work Practices for the Experience and Outcomes of Work , 2001 .

[15]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  Ewart Keep,et al.  Re-visiting the Nordic approaches to work re-organization and job redesign: lessons for UK skills policy , 2003 .

[17]  Peter Cappelli,et al.  Do 'High-Performance' Work Practices Improve Establishment-Level Outcomes? , 1999 .

[18]  Gil Preuss,et al.  Manufacturing Advantage: Why High-Performance Work Systems Pay Off , 2001 .

[19]  J. Barker.  Tightening the Iron Cage: Concertive Control in Self-Managing Teams , 1993 .

[20]  R. Murnane,et al.  Are more college graduates really taking 'high school' jobs? , 1995, Monthly labor review.

[21]  Bill Harley,et al.  Employee Responses to High Performance Work System Practices: An Analysis of the Awirs95 Data , 2002 .

[22]  Derek C. Jones,et al.  Employee Participation, Ownership, and Productivity: A Theoretical Framework , 1995 .

[23]  Petri Bockerman,et al.  Erosion of the Ghent System and Union Membership Decline: Lessons from Finland , 2006 .

[24]  A. Kauhanen.  The Incidence of High-Performance Work Systems: Evidence from a Nationally Representative Employee Survey , 2009 .

[25]  Paul Osterman,et al.  The Wage Effects of High Performance Work Organization in Manufacturing , 2006 .

[26]  John Paul Macduffie.  Human Resource Bundles and Manufacturing Performance: Organizational Logic and Flexible Production Systems in the World Auto Industry , 1995 .

[27]  Cristina B. Gibson,et al.  “Exporting” teams: enhancing the implementation and effectiveness of work teams in global affiliates , 2001 .

[28]  Mike Richardson,et al.  High Performance Work Systems and Workplace Partnership: A Case Study of Aerospace Workers , 2004 .

[29]  Thomas A. Kochan,et al.  What works at work : overview and assessment , 1996 .

[30]  Brian E. Becker,et al.  HIGH PERFORMANCE WORK SYSTEMS AND FIRM PERFORMANCE : A SYNTHESIS OF RESEARCH AND MANAGERIAL IMPLICATIONS , 1998 .

[31]  A. Cameron,et al.  Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications , 2005 .

[32]  Paul Milgrom,et al.  Complementarities and fit strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing , 1995 .

[33]  J. Forth,et al.  High-Involvement Management and Pay in Britain , 2004 .

[34]  Jonathan Payne.  Re-Evaluating the Finnish Workplace Development Programme: Evidence from Two Projects in the Municipal Sector , 2004 .

[35]  Rosemary L. Batt,et al.  Who Benefits from Teams? Comparing Workers, Supervisors, and Managers , 2004 .

[36]  Robert Karasek,et al.  Job decision latitude and mental strain: Implications for job redesign , 1979 .

[37]  Casey Ichniowski,et al.  The Effects of Human Resource Management Practices on Productivity , 1995 .

[38]  Sandra E. Black,et al.  What's Driving the New Economy?: The Benefits of Workplace Innovation , 2000 .

[39]  Nicolai Kristensen,et al.  New Evidence on Cross-Country Differences in Job Satisfaction Using Anchoring Vignettes , 2008 .

[40]  James N. Baron,et al.  Strategic Human Resources: Frameworks for General Managers , 1999 .

[41]  M. Handel,et al.  Editors' Introduction: The Effects of New Work Practices on Workers , 2004 .

[42]  Rick Delbridge,et al.  Employee Perceptions of Job Influence and Organizational Participation Employee Perceptions , 2001 .

[43]  Wg Harley.  Hope or Hype? High Performance Work Systems , 2005 .

[44]  M. Kleiner,et al.  Who Benefits Most from Employee Involvement: Firms or Workers? , 2000 .

[45]  S. Robinson.  Trust and Breach of the Psychological Contract , 1996 .

[46]  A. Bartel.  Human Resource Management and Organizational Performance: Evidence from Retail Banking , 2004 .

[47]  Dora Scholarios,et al.  Employees and High-PerformanceWork Systems:Testinginside the Black Box , 2000 .

[48]  John Paul Macduffie,et al.  The Adoption of High‐Involvement Work Practices , 1996 .

[49]  T. Alasoini.  In Search of Generative Results: A New Generation of Programmes to Develop Work Organization , 2006 .

[50]  Ruth Milkman,et al.  The New American Workplace: Transforming Work Systems in the United States. , 1993 .

[51]  F. Dobbin,et al.  National Employment Systems and Job Autonomy: Why Job Autonomy is High in the Nordic Countries and Low in the United States, Canada, and Australia , 1999 .

[52]  Bill Harley,et al.  Team Membership and the Experience of Work in Britain: An Analysis of the WERS98 Data , 2001 .

[53]  David Fairris,et al.  'Flexible' Work Practices and Occupational Safety and Health: Exploring the Relationship between Cumulative Trauma Disorders and Workplace Transformation , 2001 .