The effect of augmented speech-language therapy delivered by telerehabilitation on poststroke aphasia—a pilot randomized controlled trial

Objective: Pilot a definitive randomized controlled trial of speech-language telerehabilitation in poststroke aphasia in addition to usual care with regard to recruitment, drop-outs, and language effects. Design: Pilot single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Setting: Telerehabilitation delivered from tertiary rehabilitation center to participants at their home or admitted to secondary rehabilitation centers. Subjects: People with naming impairment due to aphasia following stroke. Intervention: Sixty-two participants randomly allocated to 5 hours of speech and language telerehabilitation by videoconference per week over four consecutive weeks together with usual care or usual care alone. The telerehabilitation targeted functional, expressive language. Main measures: Norwegian Basic Aphasia Assessment: naming (primary outcome), repetition, and auditory comprehension subtests; Verb and Sentence Test sentence production subtest and the Communicative Effectiveness Index at baseline, four weeks, and four months postrandomization. Data were analyzed by intention to treat. Results: No significant between-group differences were seen in naming or auditory comprehension in the Norwegian Basic Aphasia Assessment at four weeks and four months post randomization. The telerehabilitation group (n = 29) achieved a Norwegian Basic Aphasia Assessment repetition score of 8.9 points higher (P = 0.026) and a Verb and Sentence Test score 3 points higher (P = 0.002) than the control group (n = 27) four months postrandomization. Communicative Effectiveness Index was not significantly different between groups, but increased significantly within both groups. No adverse events were reported. Conclusion: Augmented telerehabilitation via videoconference may be a viable rehabilitation model for aphasia affecting language outcomes poststroke. A definitive trial with 230 participants is needed to confirm results.

[1]  M. Nicholas,et al.  A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: The ROMA consensus statement , 2018, International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society.

[2]  Silje Merethe Hansen,et al.  Telerehabilitation for aphasia – protocol of a pragmatic, exploratory, pilot randomized controlled trial , 2018, Trials.

[3]  C. Breitenstein Studie belegt Wirksamkeit intensiver Sprachtherapie bei chronischer Aphasie , 2017 .

[4]  A. Villringer,et al.  Intensive speech and language therapy in patients with chronic aphasia after stroke: a randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint, controlled trial in a health-care setting , 2017, The Lancet.

[5]  F. Silver,et al.  Poststroke Aphasia Frequency, Recovery, and Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. , 2016, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[6]  M. Campbell,et al.  CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials , 2016, British Medical Journal.

[7]  Stephanie M. Wilson,et al.  A comparison of remote therapy, face to face therapy and an attention control intervention for people with aphasia: a quasi-randomised controlled feasibility study , 2016, Clinical rehabilitation.

[8]  J. Wyatt,et al.  Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  Nerissa C. Hall,et al.  Telepractice in the Assessment and Treatment of Individuals with Aphasia: A Systematic Review , 2013, International journal of telerehabilitation.

[10]  Munyaradzi Dimairo,et al.  , Poststroke : A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Computer Therapy Compared With Usual Care for People With Long-Standing Aphasia , 2012 .

[11]  Charles R Doarn,et al.  Overview of telehealth activities in speech-language pathology. , 2008, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[12]  D. Moher,et al.  Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[13]  D. Theodoros,et al.  Telerehabilitation for service delivery in speech-language pathology , 2008, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[14]  F. Gutzwiller,et al.  Epidemiology of Aphasia Attributable to First Ischemic Stroke: Incidence, Severity, Fluency, Etiology, and Thrombolysis , 2006, Stroke.

[15]  FriedemannPulvermüller,et al.  Constraint-Induced Therapy of Chronic Aphasia After Stroke , 2001 .

[16]  D. Howard,et al.  Newcastle University Aphasia Therapy Resources: Auditory Processing , 2009 .

[17]  D. Howard,et al.  Newcastle University Aphasia Therapy Resources: Sentence Processing , 2009 .

[18]  D. Howard,et al.  Newcastle University Aphasia Therapy Resources: Written Comprehension , 2009 .

[19]  R Whurr,et al.  Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke. , 2000, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.