Matching mammographic regions in mediolateral oblique and cranio caudal views: a probabilistic approach

Most of the current CAD systems detect suspicious mass regions independently in single views. In this paper we present a method to match corresponding regions in mediolateral oblique (MLO) and craniocaudal (CC) mammographic views of the breast. For every possible combination of mass regions in the MLO view and CC view, a number of features are computed, such as the difference in distance of a region to the nipple, a texture similarity measure, the gray scale correlation and the likelihood of malignancy of both regions computed by single-view analysis. In previous research, Linear Discriminant Analysis was used to discriminate between correct and incorrect links. In this paper we investigate if the performance can be improved by employing a statistical method in which four classes are distinguished. These four classes are defined by the combinations of view (MLO/CC) and pathology (TP/FP) labels. We use distance-weighted k-Nearest Neighbor density estimation to estimate the likelihood of a region combination. Next, a correspondence score is calculated as the likelihood that the region combination is a TP-TP link. The method was tested on 412 cases with a malignant lesion visible in at least one of the views. In 82.4% of the cases a correct link could be established between the TP detections in both views. In future work, we will use the framework presented here to develop a context dependent region matching scheme, which takes the number and likelihood of possible alternatives into account. It is expected that more accurate determination of matching probabilities will lead to improved CAD performance.

[1]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Combining two mammographic projections in a computer aided mass detection method. , 2007, Medical physics.

[2]  Dansheng Song,et al.  Computer-aided mass detection based on ipsilateral multiview mammograms. , 2007, Academic radiology.

[3]  Michael Brady,et al.  Determining Correspondence Between Views , 1998, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[4]  C. Floyd,et al.  Evaluation of information-theoretic similarity measures for content-based retrieval and detection of masses in mammograms. , 2006, Medical physics.

[6]  B Sahiner,et al.  A regional registration technique for automated interval change analysis of breast lesions on mammograms. , 1999, Medical physics.

[7]  N Karssemeijer,et al.  Automated classification of parenchymal patterns in mammograms. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  Nasser M. Nasrabadi,et al.  Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2006, Technometrics.

[9]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Improvement of computerized mass detection on mammograms: fusion of two-view information. , 2002, Medical physics.

[10]  N. Karssemeijer,et al.  A new 2D segmentation method based on dynamic programming applied to computer aided detection in mammography. , 2004, Medical physics.

[11]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  A regional registration method to find corresponding mass lesions in temporal mammogram pairs. , 2005, Medical physics.

[12]  Lubomir M. Hadjiiski,et al.  Bilateral analysis based false positive reduction for computer-aided mass detection. , 2007, Medical physics.

[13]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Thickness correction of mammographic images by anisotropic filtering and interpolation of dense tissue , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[14]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.

[15]  Sahibsingh A. Dudani.  The Distance-Weighted k-Nearest-Neighbor Rule , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[16]  E. Egge,et al.  Computed assisted detection of interval breast cancers. , 2001, European journal of radiology.

[17]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Detection of stellate distortions in mammograms , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[18]  N. Karssemeijer,et al.  Finding corresponding regions of interest in mediolateral oblique and craniocaudal mammographic views. , 2006, Medical physics.