Edith Penrose, organisational economics and business strategy: an assessment and extension

The aim of this paper is to expound Penrose's contribution to the theory of the firm, and examine the contribution of her thinking to economics and business strategy, as well as to discuss some limitations and provide some generalizations of Penrose's work. We also discuss implications for managerial practice and public policy. We claim that Penrose's contribution was seminal. In recognizing the significance of organization to generate new knowledge she went well beyond the bounds of even her own agenda; from a theory of the growth of firms, to a theory of the generation of organizational knowledge and beyond. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Nicolai Juul Foss,et al.  Research In Strategy, Economics, and Michael Porter* , 1996 .

[2]  Robin Marris.  Edith Penrose and Economics , 1999 .

[3]  R. Coase.  The Nature of the Firm , 1937 .

[4]  L. Vogel,et al.  Strategy and Structure , 1986 .

[5]  HES Presidential Address Hayek: Right for the Wrong Reasons? , 2001, Journal of the History of Economic Thought.

[6]  Ben Fine,et al.  Endogenous Growth Theory: A Critical Assessment , 2000 .

[7]  G. Richardson.  Mrs Penrose and neoclassical theory , 1999 .

[8]  Brian J. Loasby,et al.  The Significance of Penrose's Theory for the Development of Economics , 1999 .

[9]  Allyn A. Young,et al.  INCREASING RETURNS AND ECONOMIC PROGRESS , 1928 .

[10]  Paul M. Romer,et al.  The Origins of Endogenous Growth , 1994 .

[11]  Robert M. Grant,et al.  Porter's ‘competitive advantage of nations’: An assessment , 1991 .

[12]  M. Porter.  Towards a dynamic theory of strategy , 1991 .

[13]  J. Liebeskind,et al.  Knowledge, Strategy, and the Theory of the Firm , 1996 .

[14]  R. Lucas.  On the Mechanics of Economic Development , 1988 .

[15]  W. Baumol.  Contestable Markets: An Uprising in the Theory of Industry Structure , 1982 .

[16]  F. Modigliani,et al.  New Developments on the Oligopoly Front , 1958, Journal of Political Economy.

[17]  H. Demsetz,et al.  Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization , 1975, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[18]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation , 1993 .

[19]  J. E. Butler,et al.  Tautology in the resource-based view and the implications of externally determined resource value: f , 2001 .

[20]  P. Romer.  Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[21]  H. Demsetz,et al.  The economics of the business firm : seven critical commentaries , 1995 .

[22]  Stephen A. Marglin,et al.  Knowledge and Power , 1984 .

[23]  Hiroyuki Odagiri,et al.  Growth through Competition, Competition through Growth , 1994 .

[24]  W. Arthur,et al.  INCREASING RETURNS AND LOCK-IN BY HISTORICAL EVENTS , 1989 .

[25]  Nicolai J. Foss,et al.  Edith Penrose, Economics and Strategic Management , 1999 .

[26]  A. Giddens.  The Constitution of Society , 1985 .

[27]  C. Pitelis,et al.  Edith Elura Tilton Penrose: life, contribution and influence , 1999 .

[28]  D. North.  Structure and Change in Economic History , 1983 .

[29]  A. Rugman,et al.  Edith Penrose's contribution to the resource-based view of strategic management , 2002 .

[30]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[31]  R. Coase,et al.  The Firm, the Market, and the Law , 1990 .

[32]  Stephen A. Marglin,et al.  What Do Bosses Do? , 1974 .

[33]  J. Barney.  Is the Resource-Based “View” a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research? Yes , 2001 .

[34]  Christos N. Pitelis,et al.  Edith penrose: Pioneer of stakeholder theory , 1998 .

[35]  Richard L. Priem,et al.  Is the Resource-Based “View” a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research? , 2001 .

[36]  J. Bain.  Barriers to new competition , 1957 .

[37]  Christos N. Pitelis,et al.  A theory of the (growth of the) transnational firm: a Penrosean perspective , 2000 .

[38]  Neil M. Kay,et al.  Hercules and Penrose , 1999 .

[39]  E. Penrose,et al.  Limits to the Growth and Size of Firms , 1955 .

[40]  G. Richardson,et al.  The Organisation of Industry , 1972 .

[41]  Joseph T. Mahoney,et al.  Penrose’s Resource-Based Approach: The Process and Product of Research Creativity , 2002 .

[42]  Christos N. Pitelis,et al.  Transaction costs versus resource value , 1999 .

[43]  O. Williamson,et al.  STRATEGY RESEARCH: GOVERNANCE AND COMPETENCE PERSPECTIVES , 1999 .

[44]  J. Cantwell.  Innovation, profits, and growth: Penrose and Schumpeter , 2002 .

[45]  E. Penrose.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[46]  B. Kogut,et al.  What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity, and Learning , 1996 .

[47]  Martin Fransman,et al.  Information, Knowledge Vision and Theories of the Firm , 1994 .