Boosting Brain Signal Variability Underlies Liberal Shifts in Decision Bias
暂无分享,去创建一个
Johannes J. Fahrenfort | Ulman Lindenberger | Douglas D. Garrett | Niels A Kloosterman | Julian Quirin Kosciessa | Niels A. Kloosterman | Julian Q. Kosciessa | J. Fahrenfort | U. Lindenberger | D. Garrett
[1] Samira M. Epp,et al. Higher performers upregulate brain signal variability in response to more feature-rich visual input , 2020, NeuroImage.
[2] G. Woodman,et al. Event-related potential studies of attention , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[3] S. Jones. When brain rhythms aren't ‘rhythmic’: implication for their mechanisms and meaning , 2016, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.
[4] Gustavo Deco,et al. Stochastic dynamics as a principle of brain function , 2009, Progress in Neurobiology.
[5] C. Grady,et al. The Importance of Being Variable , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[6] I. Dinstein,et al. The Relationship between Trial-by-Trial Variability and Oscillations of Cortical Population Activity , 2019, Scientific Reports.
[7] Niels A Kloosterman,et al. Standard multiscale entropy reflects neural dynamics at mismatched temporal scales: What’s signal irregularity got to do with it? , 2020, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[8] Natasa Kovacevic,et al. Increased Brain Signal Variability Accompanies Lower Behavioral Variability in Development , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[9] D. M. Green,et al. Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .
[10] Nelson J. Trujillo-Barreto,et al. Induced gamma band responses in human EEG after the control of miniature saccadic artifacts , 2011, NeuroImage.
[11] Christopher Summerfield,et al. Metacognition in human decision-making: confidence and error monitoring , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[12] D. Altman,et al. Statistics notes: Calculating correlation coefficients with repeated observations: Part 1—correlation within subjects , 1995 .
[13] J. Obleser,et al. Local cortical desynchronization and pupil-linked arousal differentially shape brain states for optimal sensory performance , 2019, eLife.
[14] Henrik Walter,et al. The left inferior frontal gyrus is involved in adjusting response bias during a perceptual decision-making task , 2014, Brain and behavior.
[15] Rufin VanRullen,et al. Four Common Conceptual Fallacies in Mapping the Time Course of Recognition , 2011, Front. Psychology.
[16] Irene E. Nagel,et al. Amphetamine modulates brain signal variability and working memory in younger and older adults , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[17] A. Compte,et al. Bump attractor dynamics in prefrontal cortex explains behavioral precision in spatial working memory , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.
[18] David J. Heeger,et al. Neural variability: friend or foe? , 2015, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[19] Niels A. Kloosterman,et al. Dynamic modulation of decision biases by brainstem arousal systems , 2017, eLife.
[20] Anne E. Urai,et al. Confirmation Bias through Selective Overweighting of Choice-Consistent Evidence , 2018, Current Biology.
[21] Andrew M. Clark,et al. Stimulus onset quenches neural variability: a widespread cortical phenomenon , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.
[22] Niels A. Kloosterman,et al. Humans strategically shift decision bias by flexibly adjusting sensory evidence accumulation in visual cortex , 2018 .
[23] Johannes J. Fahrenfort,et al. Masking Disrupts Reentrant Processing in Human Visual Cortex , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[24] Aggelos K. Katsaggelos,et al. Signal Processing and Communications , 2001 .
[25] R. Romo,et al. The role of fluctuations in perception , 2008, Trends in Neurosciences.
[26] J. Richman,et al. Physiological time-series analysis using approximate entropy and sample entropy. , 2000, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.
[27] S. MacDonald,et al. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Review Moment-to-moment Brain Signal Variability: a next Frontier in Human Brain Mapping? , 2022 .
[28] Nitzan Censor,et al. Neural Variability Quenching Predicts Individual Perceptual Abilities , 2017, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[29] R. Fisher. FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF THE VALUES OF THE CORRELATION COEFFIENTS IN SAMPLES FROM AN INDEFINITELY LARGE POPU;ATION , 1915 .
[30] Hauke R. Heekeren,et al. Age-Related Decline in Brain Resources Modulates Genetic Effects on Cognitive Functioning , 2008, Front. Neurosci..
[31] W. T. Maddox,et al. Multiple brain networks contribute to the acquisition of bias in perceptual decision-making , 2015, Front. Neurosci..
[32] Ann M Hermundstad,et al. Adaptive coding for dynamic sensory inference , 2017, bioRxiv.
[33] M Doppelmayr,et al. A method for the calculation of induced band power: implications for the significance of brain oscillations. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.
[34] C. Grady,et al. The modulation of BOLD variability between cognitive states varies by age and processing speed. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.
[35] Markus Werkle-Bergner,et al. On the estimation of brain signal entropy from sparse neuroimaging data , 2016, Scientific Reports.
[36] Viktor K. Jirsa,et al. Noise during Rest Enables the Exploration of the Brain's Dynamic Repertoire , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[37] P. Grassberger,et al. Characterization of experimental (noisy) strange attractors , 1984 .
[38] Niels A. Kloosterman,et al. Top-down modulation in human visual cortex predicts the stability of a perceptual illusion. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.
[39] Joshua I. Gold,et al. Pupil Size as a Window on Neural Substrates of Cognition , 2020, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[40] R. Dolan,et al. The neural basis of metacognitive ability , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[41] S. Cole,et al. Brain Oscillations and the Importance of Waveform Shape , 2017, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[42] Ulman Lindenberger,et al. Humans strategically shift decision bias by flexibly adjusting sensory evidence accumulation , 2019, eLife.
[43] Jack W. Tsao,et al. Observed brain dynamics, P.P. Mitra, H. Bokil. Oxford University Press (2008), ISBN-13: 978-0-19-517808-1, 381 pages, $65.00 , 2009 .
[44] Douglas D. Garrett,et al. Standard multiscale entropy reflects spectral power at mismatched temporal scales: What’s signal irregularity got to do with it? , 2019, bioRxiv.
[45] T. Yarkoni. Big Correlations in Little Studies: Inflated fMRI Correlations Reflect Low Statistical Power—Commentary on Vul et al. (2009) , 2009, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
[46] T. Brismar,et al. Comment on "Multiscale entropy analysis of complex physiologic time series". , 2004, Physical review letters.
[47] A. McIntosh,et al. Applications of EEG Neuroimaging Data: Event-related Potentials, Spectral Power, and Multiscale Entropy , 2013, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.
[48] Sarah Marzen,et al. The evolution of lossy compression , 2015, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.
[49] F. Perrin,et al. Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.
[50] Thad A. Polk,et al. Higher performers upregulate brain signal variability in response to more feature-rich visual input , 2018, NeuroImage.
[51] Anne E. Urai,et al. Choice history biases subsequent evidence accumulation , 2019, eLife.
[52] Roger Ratcliff,et al. The Diffusion Decision Model: Theory and Data for Two-Choice Decision Tasks , 2008, Neural Computation.
[53] Pere Caminal,et al. Refined Multiscale Entropy: Application to 24-h Holter Recordings of Heart Period Variability in Healthy and Aortic Stenosis Subjects , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.
[54] L. Pinneo. On noise in the nervous system. , 1966, Psychological review.
[55] Stephen M Fleming,et al. Overcoming status quo bias in the human brain , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[56] Margot J. Taylor,et al. Brain noise is task dependent and region specific. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.
[57] Stanislas Dehaene,et al. Cortical activity is more stable when sensory stimuli are consciously perceived , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[58] M. D’Esposito,et al. Causal evidence for frontal cortex organization for perceptual decision making , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[59] A. Verghese. The Importance Of Being. , 2016, Health affairs.
[60] J. Rinzel,et al. Noise-induced alternations in an attractor network model of perceptual bistability. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.
[61] Xiao-Jing Wang,et al. Probabilistic Decision Making by Slow Reverberation in Cortical Circuits , 2002, Neuron.
[62] Rishidev Chaudhuri,et al. The intrinsic attractor manifold and population dynamics of a canonical cognitive circuit across waking and sleep , 2019, Nature Neuroscience.
[63] R. Oostenveld,et al. Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.
[64] K. Linkenkaer-Hansen,et al. Long-Range Temporal Correlations and Scaling Behavior in Human Brain Oscillations , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[65] Sandro Romani,et al. Discrete attractor dynamics underlies persistent activity in the frontal cortex , 2019, Nature.
[66] Michael X Cohen,et al. Analyzing Neural Time Series Data: Theory and Practice , 2014 .
[67] J. Gold,et al. Relationships between Pupil Diameter and Neuronal Activity in the Locus Coeruleus, Colliculi, and Cingulate Cortex , 2016, Neuron.
[68] T. Knapen,et al. Decision-related pupil dilation reflects upcoming choice and individual bias , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[69] Ning Xinbao. Multiscale entropy analysis of complex physiologic time series , 2007 .
[70] Marta Kutas,et al. Cognitive and neural mechanisms of decision biases in recognition memory. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.
[71] Viktor K. Jirsa,et al. The multiscale entropy: Guidelines for use and interpretation in brain signal analysis , 2016, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.
[72] J. Bakdash,et al. Repeated Measures Correlation , 2017, Front. Psychol..
[73] Robert Oostenveld,et al. FieldTrip: Open Source Software for Advanced Analysis of MEG, EEG, and Invasive Electrophysiological Data , 2010, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..
[74] Sung-joo Lim,et al. Dopaminergic modulation of hemodynamic signal variability and the functional connectome during cognitive performance , 2017, bioRxiv.
[75] C. Cassanello,et al. Frontal Eye Field Neurons Signal Changes in Decision Criteria , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.