Planning Educational Research: Determining the Necessary Sample Size.

AbstractIn planning a research study, investigators are frequently uncertain regarding the minimal number of subjects needed to adequately test a hypothesis of interest. The present paper discusses the sample size problem and four factors which affect its solution: significance level, statistical power, analysis procedure, and effect size. The interrelationship between these factors is discussed and demonstrated by calculating minimal sample size requirements for a variety of research conditions.

[1]  L. J. Chase,et al.  Communication disorders: a power analytic assessment of recent research. , 1975, Journal of communication disorders.

[2]  James A. Kulik,et al.  Effectiveness of Programmed Instruction in Higher Education: A Meta-analysis of Findings , 1980 .

[3]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[4]  Chen-Lin C. Kulik,et al.  Educational Outcomes of Tutoring: A Meta-analysis of Findings , 1982 .

[5]  D. Redfield,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Research on Teacher Questioning Behavior , 1981 .

[6]  James K. Brewer,et al.  On the Power of Statistical Tests in the American Educational Research Journal 1 , 1972 .

[7]  Stanley J. Baran,et al.  An Assessment of Quantitative Research in Mass Communication , 1976 .

[8]  Herbert J. Walberg,et al.  Motivation and Achievement: A Quantitative Synthesis , 1979 .

[9]  J. Kulik,et al.  Effects of Computer-Based Teaching on Secondary School Students. , 1983 .

[10]  D. M. Penfold,et al.  Statistical Methods in Education , 1970 .

[11]  N. Draper,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis , 1966 .

[12]  J. Elashoff,et al.  Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research. , 1975 .

[13]  Gene V. Glass,et al.  Meta-analysis of Research on Class Size and Its Relationship to Attitudes and Instruction , 1980 .

[14]  L. S. Feldt.  What Size Samples for Methods/Materials Experiments? , 1973 .

[15]  Joel R. Levin,et al.  DETERMINING SAMPLE SIZE FOR PLANNED AND POST HOC ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE COMPARISONS1 , 1975 .

[16]  Chen-Lin C. Kulik,et al.  Effectiveness of Computer-based College Teaching: A Meta-analysis of Findings , 1980 .

[17]  J. Dusek,et al.  The Bases of Teacher Expectancies: A Meta-Analysis. , 1983 .

[18]  Chen-Lin C. Kulik,et al.  Effects of Ability Grouping on Secondary School Students: A Meta-analysis of Evaluation Findings , 1981 .

[19]  Jeffrey Katzer,et al.  An Analysis of the Use of Statistical Testing in Communication Research , 1973 .

[20]  Wilbur S. Ames,et al.  A Meta-analysis of the Effects of Advance Organizers on Learning and Retention , 1980 .