The tidal waves of connected health devices with healthcare applications: consequences on privacy and care management in European healthcare systems

BackgroundThe market for Connected Health Devices (CHD) with healthcare applications is growing fast and should be worth several billion euros in turnover in the coming years. Their development will completely transform the organisation of our healthcare system, profoundly change the way patients are managed and revolutionizes disease prevention.Main bodyThe CHD with healthcare applications is a tidal wave that has societal impact calling into question the privacy of patients’ personal and healthcare information and its protection in secure systems. Rather than trying to stop the use of CHD, we must channel the wave by clearly examining the advantages versus the risks and threats to the patients, and find counter-measures for implementation. The main difficulty is channeling the wave in a way that is acceptable to CHD developers who otherwise will bypass the rules, even if they can be sued for it. Therefore, it appears necessary to implement guidelines that can be used by all developers, defining the minimum requirement for assuring the security of patient privacy and healthcare management.ConclusionIn European Healthcare Systems, there is an imperative need for establishing security guidelines that CHD producers could use to ensure compliance, so that patient privacy and healthcare management is safeguarded. The aim would be to implement the guidelines a posteriori rather than a priori control so as not to hamper innovation.

[1]  R. Glasgow,et al.  Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. , 1999, American journal of public health.

[2]  S. Ziebland,et al.  How the internet affects patients' experience of cancer: a qualitative study , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  A. Sheikh,et al.  Telemonitoring based service redesign for the management of uncontrolled hypertension: multicentre randomised controlled trial , 2013, BMJ.

[4]  I. Olkin,et al.  Using pedometers to increase physical activity and improve health: a systematic review. , 2007, JAMA.

[5]  P. Hustinx Privacy by design: delivering the promises , 2010 .

[6]  D. Turok,et al.  Pills on the World Wide Web: reducing barriers through technology. , 2015, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  Anazida Zainal,et al.  Advancements of Data Anomaly Detection Research in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Survey and Open Issues , 2013, Sensors.

[8]  Panagiotis D. Bamidis,et al.  Internet of Things For an Age-Friendly Healthcare , 2015, MIE.

[9]  Roman Hovorka,et al.  Home Use of an Artificial Beta Cell in Type 1 Diabetes. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  Darryl Booth Internet of things builds capacity for automatic temperature logging. , 2015, Journal of environmental health.

[11]  Gaetano Marrocco,et al.  RFID Technology for IoT-Based Personal Healthcare in Smart Spaces , 2014, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[12]  Mark Ryan,et al.  Coercion-resistance and receipt-freeness in electronic voting , 2006, 19th IEEE Computer Security Foundations Workshop (CSFW'06).

[13]  Sanggon Lee,et al.  Security Analysis and Improvements of Authentication and Access Control in the Internet of Things , 2014, Sensors.

[14]  Lei Jiang,et al.  A Robust and Efficient Timestamp-based Remote User Authentication Scheme with Smart Card Lost Attack Resistance , 2013, Int. J. Netw. Secur..

[15]  Deokho Kim,et al.  A Malicious Pattern Detection Engine for Embedded Security Systems in the Internet of Things , 2014, Sensors.

[16]  Claudio Cobelli,et al.  2 month evening and night closed-loop glucose control in patients with type 1 diabetes under free-living conditions: a randomised crossover trial. , 2015, The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology.