A guide for instrument development and validation.

As occupational therapists become increasingly concerned with accountability, the paucity of adequate instrumentation available for documenting therapeutic effectiveness surfaces as a major problem. Therapists will need to construct new or refine existing instruments to satisfy the requirements of third-party payment. The purpose of this paper is to illustrate how a new instrument is planned, developed, and validated. A sequential step-by-step process is illustrated with a flowchart and applied in the hypothetical construction of an attitude scale to assess school administrators' valuing of the role of occupational therapists in the schools. This example is provided to show how general psychometric principles are applied within an occupational therapy context.

[1]  L. Guttman.  A basis for scaling qualitative data. , 1944 .

[2]  C. Gaebler,et al.  Measurement of ocular pursuits in normal children. , 1981, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[3]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. , 1957 .

[4]  Allen L. Edwards,et al.  Techniques Of Attitude Scale Construction , 1958 .

[5]  Hasselkus Br,et al.  Measurement in occupational therapy. , 1976, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[6]  S. Cermak,et al.  Reliability of dichotic listening using two stimulus formats with normal and learning-disabled children. , 1981, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[7]  D. Frisbie,et al.  EQUIVALENCE OF QUESTIONNAIRE ITEMS WITH VARYING RESPONSE FORMATS , 1979 .

[8]  S. S. Komorita,et al.  Number of Scale Points and the Reliability of Scales , 1965 .

[9]  L. Thurstone.  Attitudes Can Be Measured , 1928, American Journal of Sociology.